Page 1 of 2
Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:59 pm
by bsm
Why did Floop finish 9th, and me 10th...
we both averaged rank 15 exactly, but I had 33 tril more power than him
just curious
PS: Congrats to ETL on winning.
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:03 am
by Come_Forth
I was wondering that as well
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:14 am
by Zeratul
the sum of your ranks were equal...
Floophead_III
9 - 84,015,519,712,390
13 - 162,989,509,656
22 - 113,774,886,048
17 - Lvl: 22 - 52,341,292,082 - Lvl: 23 - 83,358,511,624,604
8 - 327,902,400,000
Sum ranks = 60
bsm
10 - 117,401,646,204,986
21 - 102,959,846,365
12 - 189,000,158,550
12 - Lvl: 24 - 116,870,646,200,071 - Lvl: 0 - 0
15 - 239,040,000,000
Sum ranks = 60
so it seems that it was pure luck for floophead_III
after all, rank is calculated from ranks, not from total power...
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:18 am
by S1eepy
from what i understand its something to do with the fact he had 3 higher ranked stats than you, and you only had 2 higher ranked than him
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:52 am
by floophead_III
It's because I'm awesome.
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:21 pm
by bsm
S1eepy wrote:from what i understand its something to do with the fact he had 3 higher ranked stats than you, and you only had 2 higher ranked than him
or since there are only 4 ranked stats, I had 2 ranked higher than him, and he had 2 ranked higher than me....
and coincidently, since we both averaged the same rank... his 2 ranks were 15 combined better than mine, and my 2 ranks were *drumroll* 15 better than his!
hehe, as I said, I don't care, I'd just like to know definitively
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:19 pm
by Zeratul
floop - bsm
13 - 21 (attack)
22 - 12 (defense)
17 - 12 (covert)
8 - 15 (MS)
might be because Floophead had one rank in top 10, while you didnt...
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:58 am
by Mato
his rank 8 MS is the reason, if your def would be rank 7 and covert rank 17 you would have a better rank.
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:06 am
by Neimenljivi
It happend to me and monsturo in era 9 too...I had a lot more power and we both had, if calculated, same rank, but I was #1 commander while he wasn't commander so his commander rank was 0..
~Jack
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:29 am
by n00blet
Neimenljivi wrote:It happend to me and monsturo in era 9 too...I had a lot more power and we both had, if calculated, same rank, but I was #1 commander while he wasn't commander so his commander rank was 0..
~Jack
I doubt Commander rank or power has an influence on your rank at the end.
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:42 am
by Neimenljivi
n00blet wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:It happend to me and monsturo in era 9 too...I had a lot more power and we both had, if calculated, same rank, but I was #1 commander while he wasn't commander so his commander rank was 0..
~Jack
I doubt Commander rank or power has an influence on your rank at the end.
Era:
9
Name: monstruo
Ranks: Attack 9, Def 8, Covert 10, MotherShip 3, Commander 0
Total Power: 61,763,088,097,336
Total Ranks without commander ranking: 30
Overal Rank: 6
Name: Jack Oneil
Ranks: Attack: 8, Def 10, Covert 7, MotherShip 5, Commander 1
Total Power: 75,824,883,545,666
Total Ranks without commander ranking: 30
Overal Rank: 7
in calculation against him, 1 rank with biggest diffrence = Covert, 3 diffrence for me...
So only explanation I found logic is Commander Rank...
~Jack
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:03 am
by n00blet
Neimenljivi wrote:Era:
9
Name: monstruo
Ranks: Attack 9, Def 8, Covert 10, MotherShip 3
Name: Jack Oneil
Ranks: Attack: 8, Def 10, Covert 7, MotherShip 5
your and his best rank in bold ... his best: rank 3, and yours: rank 5. Therefore he has a better overall rank.
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:53 am
by Zeratul
neither floophead nor bsm had a commander rank...
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:40 am
by Neimenljivi
n00blet wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Era:
9
Name: monstruo
Ranks: Attack 9, Def 8, Covert 10, MotherShip 3
Name: Jack Oneil
Ranks: Attack: 8, Def 10, Covert 7, MotherShip 5
your and his best rank in bold ... his best: rank 3, and yours: rank 5. Therefore he has a better overall rank.
Indeed but if you look at biggest rank diffrence, it's 3 in my favour
~Jack
Re: Not that I care, but...
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:04 am
by n00blet
Neimenljivi wrote:n00blet wrote:Neimenljivi wrote:Era:
9
Name: monstruo
Ranks: Attack 9, Def 8, Covert 10, MotherShip 3
Name: Jack Oneil
Ranks: Attack: 8, Def 10, Covert 7, MotherShip 5
your and his best rank in bold ... his best: rank 3, and yours: rank 5. Therefore he has a better overall rank.
Indeed but if you look at biggest rank diffrence, it's 3 in my favour
~Jack
Rank difference would matter only if the overall rank is based on a standard deviation.
PS: I ll give you an example: Formula 1
lets say Kimi Raikonnen and Fernando Alonso both have 120 points at the end of the season.
Kimi won the race 6 times, Alonso 5 times.
Who will win the championship?