mods postion on the rules
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:37 pm
well after reading this i guess the mods think there above the rules read it for yourself also tokra gave me this he didnt tell me to post it
Tok`ra says:
btw........ since I cant report potentel cheats on the fourm...... and I allready have your attention, I suppose Ill show this to you........
Tok`ra says: -DaDigi says- Teh fourms are revolting! Tok`ra says: says- VIVA LA REVOLUTION BABY! sends:
Tok`ra says:
hate to report a freind, but if he IS cheating ...........
DaDigi says:
upload it somewhere
Sending of "cheater.jpg" to DaDigi has failed.
DaDigi says:
or post on the forums
Tok`ra says:
nope, not gona give away my accounts
Tok`ra says:
I suppose I could send to someone else to post
DaDigi says:
please do
Tok`ra says:
oh, wait
Tok`ra says:
that'd violate a rule
Tok`ra says:
so I guess they cant report a cheater
Tok`ra says:
since only mods are immune to that rule apparently ....
DaDigi says:
again
DaDigi says:
you and I had a conversation
Tok`ra says:
same as me and almost38
DaDigi says:
and I posted the conversation
Tok`ra says:
what he chose to do with it was his own buisness
Tok`ra says:
exact same thing
DaDigi says:
no its not
DaDigi says:
almost38 was NOT in the conversation
Tok`ra says:
oh, right, hes not a mod
Tok`ra says:
execpt I was takking with him
DaDigi says:
no, you're just not understanding it
Tok`ra says:
and sent parts of our convo to him so he could LOL at it
Tok`ra says:
so he was just posting WHAT HE SAW IN A CONVO WITH ME
DaDigi says:
lol okay
DaDigi says:
you think what you want
Tok`ra says:
so therefore its the exact same, minus his not being a mod
Tok`ra says:
now, if Id directed for him what to post YES it woulda been violating the rule, same as if hed posted a message from me
Tok`ra says:
but all he did was take what he saw from me in a convo
Tok`ra says:
and post bits of it
Tok`ra says:
same as you
DaDigi says:
how do we know you didnt tell him to anyways?
Tok`ra says:
how do we know I didnt tell you too ?
Tok`ra says:
you dont
Tok`ra says:
well, only you know
Tok`ra says:
lol
DaDigi says:
its irrelevant even if you told me to
Tok`ra says:
casue youre a mod
Tok`ra says:
and imune to the rules
Tok`ra says:
right
DaDigi says:
because you and I were the sole occupants of that chat
DaDigi says:
brb
Tok`ra says:
and ?
Tok`ra says:
me and almost38 were the sole occupants of OUR chat
Tok`ra says:
and what he posted was simply what he saw in the chat
DaDigi says:
but you sent him parts/pieces of a conversation you and I had
Tok`ra says:
and/or based on it
Tok`ra says:
and hows that differnt ? peices of chats like that have been being posted for ages
Tok`ra says:
or will there be a new rule to cover that, since a mod cant admit to being wrong
DaDigi says:
because you're banned
DaDigi says:
Tok`ra says:
yeah, I know
Tok`ra says:
2nd permaban Ive recived
Tok`ra says:
well, 1st offical one
Tok`ra says:
1st permaban was psi being a lazy *modded* and not setting a unban date for a few months
Tok`ra says:
which is prolly were most of my lack of respect for hte mods comes from
Tok`ra says:
tho douche's like you certainly keep that lack of respect alive
Tok`ra says:
if you cant prove hes posting for me, then how is he posting for me
Tok`ra says:
therefore how is he breaking the rules ?
Tok`ra says:
and with the same logic
Tok`ra says:
if YOU cant PROVE youre NOT posting for me........ then how is it WITHIN the rules
Tok`ra says:
that said, so you know, I WILL send this convo to other people.
Its INFORMATION on the mods viewpoint on rules (since the mods rarley discuss the rules just make new ones) therefore its legitimite info to use
Tok`ra says:
however htey use the INFORMATION I send to the is up to them
DaDigi says:
if you cant prove hes posting for me, then how is he posting for me - you gave him the convo, hes posting for you
Tok`ra says:
Im not having them do anything for me
Tok`ra says:
so therefore no rule violation
DaDigi says:
if YOU cant PROVE youre NOT posting for me........ then how is it WITHIN the rules - because you and I were in the conversation, so its not as is you gave me the converation
DaDigi says:
hey guess what
DaDigi says:
its not how people get information
DaDigi says:
its how they use it
DaDigi says:
rather, actually thats not that true
Tok`ra says:
so if they used it in a pro-mod stance it'd be in accordence with the rules you mean
DaDigi says:
if you give someone a conversation
DaDigi says:
no, I thought that would fit this situation but it doesnt
DaDigi says:
hold on
Tok`ra says:
besides, the rule isnt exactly most well explained anyway .........
Afterall, I couldnt even report a cheater under the rule by having someone post for me
DaDigi says:
bottom line
DaDigi says:
if you give someone part of a chat
Tok`ra says:
and explain the IP adress post that WAS LEFT OPEN
DaDigi says:
oy
DaDigi says:
which post..?
Tok`ra says:
same situation, I siply gave him info larfin over how I told off a mod (who I now know was trying to play me for a fool)
Tok`ra says:
what he did with it was his own buisness
Tok`ra says:
its the same as if I sent you this
Tok`ra says:
[SGC_ReplicÅtors] is Buying ATK/income, ATK/UP planets says:
meh\
Tok`ra says:
and you posted it on the fourm in relation to, say, a thread on people saying meg
Tok`ra says:
*meh
DaDigi says:
you're just looking for ways to get around the rules
DaDigi says:
bottom line is
DaDigi says:
we had a chat
DaDigi says:
if I then go and post that chat
Tok`ra says:
one could also say Im looking for ways to follow the rules
DaDigi says:
I'm posting on my own behalf
DaDigi says:
if you give someone else that chat
DaDigi says:
and if thye post it
DaDigi says:
its on your behalf
DaDigi says:
if you meant it to be that way or not
Tok`ra says:
I had a chat, and in that chat parts of our convo came up.
He simply used THOSE parts of the chat
DaDigi says:
okay
DaDigi says:
if he had posted the convo you two had together
DaDigi says:
no problem there
Tok`ra says:
as those were the parts that were applacable to the issues on the fourm
Tok`ra says:
exactly
Tok`ra says:
he posted parts of the convo and or info learned from a convo with me
Tok`ra says:
that was all
DaDigi says:
but there was stuff that you wanted other people to see
Tok`ra says:
irrelvent. I should know as I was the main reason that rule was implemented
Tok`ra says:
I never wrote any posts for him oranything, which was the main reason the rule was made, lol
Tok`ra says:
cause I used to write a reply formyself for someone to post, complete with a reply from me in quote tags
Tok`ra says:
in this case
Tok`ra says:
he simply had the information
Tok`ra says:
and used it as he wished
Tok`ra says:
you ASSUMED he was posting for me, and therefore locked the thread
Tok`ra says:
even tho you had no hard evidence he was posting for me
DaDigi says:
if you "accidently" leave $20k in someones mailbox
DaDigi says:
and that person kills your ex-wife
DaDigi says:
the money is traced back to you
DaDigi says:
and you're held liable for the death
DaDigi says:
k?
DaDigi says:
I have no need to carry this debate further
Tok`ra says:
I dont see how that example is relevent
DaDigi says:
if you want to debate the matter further, there is an admin chat wednesday
DaDigi says:
12pm EST
Tok`ra says:
Whitey banned me on IRC over a year ago
Tok`ra says:
which is why hes permamently decended now
DaDigi says:
im sure you can find a proxy
Tok`ra says:
na
Tok`ra says:
I got fourms private email adress now, lol
Tok`ra says:
thanks to a fellow Tok`ra says:
Tok`ra says:
besides, fourm doesnt give two **Filtered**
Tok`ra says:
judging from that IRC log allready leaked
