A banned player needs a review.. A panel, a meeting to justify him being banned.. Kinda like a parole officer in a prison
So here is what I propose.
A banned player must get 2 sponsors to back them up when they become unbanned. The sponsors will have to ensure that the person stays within the rules of the forum.
IF the person on Parole/Probation (sp) breaks this agreement they themselves will be rebanned along with the sponsors.. think of it like a buddy system
What does everyone think?
Jamie
BANNINGS
-
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:41 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Human
- ID: 22325
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Contact:
Re: BANNINGS
Annnnd since it is not at this present time a rule
Tok`ra -DaDigi says- Teh fourms are revolting! Tok`ra says- VIVA LA REVOLUTION BABY! says:
I volunter ETL and pookie as my sponsors
Jamie Sheehan - ??? Forum Admin says:
ROFL
they have to agree to it wes
Tokra the banned wrote
1. Incessant spamming.
One persons spam is another persons serious post. As can be seen with
many regular members posts. REKs, buck\'s, and many others. Hell, one
mod (Rienna) has joked about warning herself for spam.
2. Disrespect for the moderators, despite what he says.
Well, this isnt even a rule anymore. Plus all I did was what is being
done in the current uprising of fourm users, I challenged the mods in
what I belived to be decisions that were ruining the community.
Considering what is happening now, I think it proves I was correct.
3. Graphic vulgarity
An utter lie, as I dont recall commonly being edited for profane speach.
4. Destruction of atmosphere
Funny they accused me of this, when the mods and their overzealous
moderation of the fourm has cause that much more than I ever did.
5. The object of innumberable complaints on the part of many members
and moderators
Essently, SOME people disagred with what I had to say. Hardly reason for a ban.
6. Racism
Now this is an utter damn lie.
7. Publicly posted the IP of a member.
I posted the IP adress of a SGW teamspeak server that a player was
hosting. Apparently, and I only learned this well after the ban, he
was hosting it on his computer. Considering I also only posted it in a
thread about the TS server, the situation would have been simply
resolved by editing it out and sending a PM (but then, pookie seems to
have issues with PMs, and responding to or sending them)
Tok`ra -DaDigi says- Teh fourms are revolting! Tok`ra says- VIVA LA REVOLUTION BABY! says:
I volunter ETL and pookie as my sponsors
Jamie Sheehan - ??? Forum Admin says:
ROFL
they have to agree to it wes
Back in my day, we massed you for disrespect!
-
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:21 am
- Race: Goa'uld Queen
- ID: 0
- Location: Capital Ha'tak
Re: BANNINGS
Jack wrote::smt043
Funny but seriously I do not agree to the sponsors being banned thing
yea it would be effectivly being banned for a bas decision and for soemthing someonelse did....
~Neph
So Congratulations I Have Arrived I'm Nephthys and Im Shining So Bright!
GhostyGoo wrote:If you want phone sex key 555-SAD-7685
Gò.Óº°°
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:10 pm
- ID: 0
Re: BANNINGS
I like it. It puts pressure on the rule breaker to not continue to do so, and the sponsors ( obviously people who are friends ) would be more then miffed at the fact that they were banned by their friend, for something stupid.
Question, how do you asertain who's a good sponsor? Obviously, if someone creates two new forum accounts, it's hardly fair to say that those are the sponsors, when it very well might be forum multi's. Is there a number of posts they should have?
~HellFire
Question, how do you asertain who's a good sponsor? Obviously, if someone creates two new forum accounts, it's hardly fair to say that those are the sponsors, when it very well might be forum multi's. Is there a number of posts they should have?
~HellFire
-
- Forum Spammer
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:31 pm
- Race: Goauld
- ID: 1925332
Re: BANNINGS
Jack wrote:It's a bad idea it'll cause more harm then good
Not really. It matters nobody gets to choose "sponsers" , Parole officers aren't your friends. I think it could work if we put a comittee of people who decide matters like that.
I got sponsored out of a banning A certain mod covered for me in the mod section and vouched for me not to cause trouble.
AncientAnubis wrote:Would you be worthy of being a God if you didn't have an overinflated ego?
-
- Forever Evil
- Posts: 7511
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:04 am
- Alliance: THE DARK DOMINIUM EMPIRE
- Race: GOD ALLMIGHTY
- ID: 666
- Alternate name(s): THEY'RE NO STRINGS ON ME
- Location: MIAMI (DOMINATED PLANET EARTH)
- Contact:
-
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:09 pm
- ID: 0
Re: BANNINGS
What's the point in banning people if you're just going to bring them back?
People who are banned should be banned for the life of this game/forum.
People who are banned should be banned for the life of this game/forum.
-
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:39 am
- Race: Vulpes
- ID: 75697
- Location: Da Hood, of course
Re: BANNINGS
The point isn't whether or not a ban should or should not be made permanent. As long as the rules are the same, a ban should stay.
However, if you have a law on the books, the law is broken, and a person is jailed for it, you can't reasonably keep them in jail if the law is later repealed.
However, if you have a law on the books, the law is broken, and a person is jailed for it, you can't reasonably keep them in jail if the law is later repealed.
-
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:09 pm
- ID: 0
Re: BANNINGS
RobinInDaHood wrote:The point isn't whether or not a ban should or should not be made permanent. As long as the rules are the same, a ban should stay.
However, if you have a law on the books, the law is broken, and a person is jailed for it, you can't reasonably keep them in jail if the law is later repealed.
Granted, but when the person is a repeat offender and has avoided bans on the past - one might see the reasoning in barring him from returning. I understand he's been given more than one chance here on these forums. How many does he need?
-
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:39 am
- Race: Vulpes
- ID: 75697
- Location: Da Hood, of course
Re: BANNINGS
Trife wrote:Granted, but when the person is a repeat offender and has avoided bans on the past - one might see the reasoning in barring him from returning. I understand he's been given more than one chance here on these forums. How many does he need?
A valid point. However, throughout history people have stood up against an establishment and rules that they don't agree with. The establishment will brand them as miscreants, rebels, or "offenders", to use your vernacular.
In this particular case, he-who-shall-not-be-named was rebelling against a set of rules he felt were oppressive and unfair. Granted, while the rules were in place, he was subject to being banned for breaking them, even if the rules were unjust. His approach to trying to fix the rules was to simply ignore them and it landed him in jail. Others might have chosen to change the laws through other, less overt means. It's just his style.
Once the rules were dissolved, however, the reasons for the ban are summarily invalidated at the same time. That said, if he is unable to comply with the new rules, a ban may be (is?) warranted again. In the interim, the ban needs to be lifted and he be allowed the same opportunity as everyone else to comply with the current rules.
Make sense?
-
- Forum Spammer
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:31 pm
- Race: Goauld
- ID: 1925332
Re: BANNINGS
he was gonna get booted from modship if i was.
AncientAnubis wrote:Would you be worthy of being a God if you didn't have an overinflated ego?
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:55 pm
- Alliance: The Legion
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 82082
- Location: australia
Re: BANNINGS
you could allways just add people who have been warned 3 times to a group were their post has to be approved( by a mod) before it gets posted
if they continue to much up, bann them appropriatly
if they continue to much up, bann them appropriatly
If you cannot convince them, confuse them.
- Harry S Truman
-
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:55 pm
- Alliance: The Legion
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 82082
- Location: australia
Re: BANNINGS
Jack wrote:It's possible to do that individually and not make a group
but a group is easyer
If you cannot convince them, confuse them.
- Harry S Truman
-
- Elder Administrator
- Posts: 23203
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
- Alliance: Lucian Alliance
- Race: Templar
- ID: 7
- Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha - Location: Nivlheim
-
Honours and Awards
Re: BANNINGS
parole group is much work to handle...
yes, it has been attempted...
yes, it has been attempted...
"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."
Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
-
- Spamity Spam In A Can
- Posts: 20465
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: chicago's nether region
Re: BANNINGS
all very interesting concepts and ideas to be considered...
in terms of rules and the layout of the mod team i agree that there is a revolt going on. that isn't better shown here namely because people know they will be modded out, so msn is buzzing with activity right now moreso than usual and those convos are turning into heated debates about the forums.....
in terms of rules and the layout of the mod team i agree that there is a revolt going on. that isn't better shown here namely because people know they will be modded out, so msn is buzzing with activity right now moreso than usual and those convos are turning into heated debates about the forums.....