RepliJake's ban
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:45 am
Was imho total bias and should be looked into. It was not announced either (way to do your homework, moddybaby)
So it all happened in this thread here:
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=96745
Nobody really knows what the warnings were issued for. It was something about Jake pointing out Jenny was spamming the topic so Jake received a warning for spamming (gotta love it). Then another one for personal insults or something (that's a common one... when no other rule kicks in, this one is always a nice fallback rule). Oh and the third one must have been something like "how dare you calling it idiotic to psycho analyze someone based on a persona on a roleplaying game forum and to tell that person to seek professional help in real life" (that one actually made my head implode... one can only take so much irony)
So, does anyone have to say anything about this?
So it all happened in this thread here:
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=96745
Nobody really knows what the warnings were issued for. It was something about Jake pointing out Jenny was spamming the topic so Jake received a warning for spamming (gotta love it). Then another one for personal insults or something (that's a common one... when no other rule kicks in, this one is always a nice fallback rule). Oh and the third one must have been something like "how dare you calling it idiotic to psycho analyze someone based on a persona on a roleplaying game forum and to tell that person to seek professional help in real life" (that one actually made my head implode... one can only take so much irony)
So, does anyone have to say anything about this?