Page 1 of 1
Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:47 pm
by FEARLESS
SGW needs a couple more reason to play rather than just the race for Rank 1 so I thought of "Golden Awards." Golden awards work like this, in a time limit of 365 days, you will awarded with your accomplishments such as:
- (Top Ten) Glories
- (Top Ten) CO
- (Top Ten) Total Power
- (Top Ten) Best Strike
- (Top Ten) Ranks
- (Top Ten) Alliance
- (Top Ten) Military Experience
- (Top Ten) Income
- (Top Ten) UP
By doing this, we would attract more players to play with this new reasons. We'll have more people online and new players coming in.
Post some Comments if any.
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:14 pm
by knockout
i like it but it would be only big players and big alliances getting the awards. what if they were based on % of growth or % of damage done per army size. so smaller players have a shot at winning one
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:24 pm
by FEARLESS
knockout wrote:i like it but it would be only big players and big alliances getting the awards. what if they were based on % of growth or % of damage done per army size. so smaller players have a shot at winning one
we could base it in ID groups? for example, 0- 10,000 and 10000+???
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:51 pm
by mondomadmun
I like the idea
would having different groups for population be better than IDs?
Like:
Lowbie 1-5mil
Midgrade 5,000,001 - 20mil
Heavyweight 20mil+
Just some thoughts. How would it be measure also? would you have to submit nominations?
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:38 pm
by FEARLESS
mondomadmun wrote:I like the idea
would having different groups for population be better than IDs?
Like:
Lowbie 1-5mil
Midgrade 5,000,001 - 20mil
Heavyweight 20mil+
Just some thoughts. How would it be measure also? would you have to submit nominations?
i like that.
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:53 pm
by knockout
possibly another increment of 21-50mill the 50mill+ just so theres a little more competition between lowers
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:06 pm
by Zeratul
might actually need several more levels...
50m-100m
100m-200m
200m+
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:39 am
by Lore
The idea has potential,,,, but will it actually contribute to the game? or would you rather see some of the major flaws fixed first?
I do like the idea tho. 1 yr is too long, make it 30 days IMO
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:16 pm
by knockout
ya per month and then a best throughout the year, also can we get like the top 10 most addicted (being the ones online the most of all in SGW) i think that one would be a laugh to see who it was.
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:31 pm
by FEARLESS
the problem with 1 month is that the "List of Legends" would get filled fast.
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:50 pm
by hidden
knockout wrote:ya per month and then a best throughout the year, also can we get like the top 10 most addicted (being the ones online the most of all in SGW) i think that one would be a laugh to see who it was.
i think we already know the answer to that
Re: Golden Awards
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:22 am
by stephen sarsfield
I like the idea. I like the levels too, just how many players is 200+ ? But 30 days is way too short. Make it 3 months.
It'll definitely introduce more competition on different levels and motivate smaller players to be more active and also give them some recognition.
Would it be possible to do it for alliances also?