You should probably put those in your first post Max, just saves having to scroll 1/2 way down the first page.
I think we need to develop an area, and do what you did, so we can see what has been suggested, and accepted ideas are added.
Max's suggestion thread...
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 7:42 pm
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 0
Re: Max's suggestion thread...
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162732
Suggestions, Comments please
Suggestions, Comments please
R8 wrote:TEAM WORK WILL BEAT $$ ANYDAY OF THE WEEKangel wrote:Except the payday [-X
12agnar0k wrote:Also it's still not a war game, you have att/def weps yes, but you also have uu and UP, does this mean its a sex game, oh no, XRATEDSGW, THIS GAME IS PORN!
Ban Admin
<+CABAL> so adminHere, ever thought about playing SGW? :b
<~adminHere> cabal - i do
<+CABAL>
<+Sarevok> Cabal, look up Jtest
<~adminHere> no -not jtest
<~adminHere> another i am a multi
<+Sarevok> :O
* +CABAL screens
<+CABAL> :b
* +Sarevok Ban's Admin
- MaxSterling
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:32 pm
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium
- ID: 83707
- Alternate name(s): Naq Daddy, The guy that just stole your naq.
- Location: In ur bank... stealin ur nakz.
Re: Max's suggestion thread...
Sarevok wrote:You should probably put those in your first post Max, just saves having to scroll 1/2 way down the first page.
I think we need to develop an area, and do what you did, so we can see what has been suggested, and accepted ideas are added.
I just created a section at the bottom of my OP listing more posts within this thread that have suggestions. Besides, I think you're limited to the number of spoilers within a post.
Spoiler
- MaxSterling
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:32 pm
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium
- ID: 83707
- Alternate name(s): Naq Daddy, The guy that just stole your naq.
- Location: In ur bank... stealin ur nakz.
Re: Max's suggestion thread...
Almost forgot about my solution to people that don't build a defense...
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162319&p=2036751&hilit=mice#p2036751
To help explain what I was saying...
Say you mass someone and zero their defense. They don't repair or rebuild by the turn change. Since they don't have any armed defenders, miners become untrained automatically.
( # of miners) X [ n% X 2^( number of consecutive turns without a defense )]
So after 1 turn change, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^1 = n% X 2 = 2n% of their remaining miners
After 2 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^2 = n% X 4 = 4n% of their remaining miners
After 3 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^3 = n% X 8 = 8n% of their remaining miners
After 4 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^4 = n% X 16 = 16n% of their remaining miners
It's just a matter of adjusting "n%" to a fair number of hours before all of their UU become untrained.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162319&p=2036751&hilit=mice#p2036751
3.) In order to get people to build defenses, make it so they must have at least 1% of their army trained as defenders. If they go below 1%, then the miners start leaving the mines and become raidable UU at an exponentially increasing amount. When the cat's away, the mice will play... Sure, people can just create armies of only attack soldiers and lifers... but what good would that be if they have no UU to rebuild their strike? They'd need to raid to recover their losses, which is how the game should be played.
To help explain what I was saying...
Say you mass someone and zero their defense. They don't repair or rebuild by the turn change. Since they don't have any armed defenders, miners become untrained automatically.
( # of miners) X [ n% X 2^( number of consecutive turns without a defense )]
So after 1 turn change, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^1 = n% X 2 = 2n% of their remaining miners
After 2 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^2 = n% X 4 = 4n% of their remaining miners
After 3 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^3 = n% X 8 = 8n% of their remaining miners
After 4 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^4 = n% X 16 = 16n% of their remaining miners
It's just a matter of adjusting "n%" to a fair number of hours before all of their UU become untrained.
Spoiler
-
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:28 am
- Alliance: T I T A N S
- Race: NanoTiMaster
- ID: 1934826
Re: Max's suggestion thread...
MaxSterling wrote:Almost forgot about my solution to people that don't build a defense...
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=162319&p=2036751&hilit=mice#p20367513.) In order to get people to build defenses, make it so they must have at least 1% of their army trained as defenders. If they go below 1%, then the miners start leaving the mines and become raidable UU at an exponentially increasing amount. When the cat's away, the mice will play... Sure, people can just create armies of only attack soldiers and lifers... but what good would that be if they have no UU to rebuild their strike? They'd need to raid to recover their losses, which is how the game should be played.
To help explain what I was saying...
Say you mass someone and zero their defense. They don't repair or rebuild by the turn change. Since they don't have any armed defenders, miners become untrained automatically.
( # of miners) X [ n% X 2^( number of consecutive turns without a defense )]
So after 1 turn change, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^1 = n% X 2 = 2n% of their remaining miners
After 2 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^2 = n% X 4 = 4n% of their remaining miners
After 3 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^3 = n% X 8 = 8n% of their remaining miners
After 4 turns with no defense, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^4 = n% X 16 = 16n% of their remaining miners
It's just a matter of adjusting "n%" to a fair number of hours before all of their UU become untrained.
I like the idea but the values are off in my opinon
and well lets say you sleep at that wrong time and get massed ..
so what 8 hrs of sleep thats 16 turns
gosh ...
if a person has 100 mill miners on the 4th turn(2hrs) then wow u just untrained 1,6 mill units to get raided .
Right I'm off to mass the biggest AS I can see.
so in that respect it won't be going into the update
but yeah I know what you mean and that was just a rough estimate.
I suggest just leave it at or whatever it will be agreed on
So after 1 turn change, they would lose...
0.1% X 2^1 = n% X 2 = 2n% of their remaining miners
also lets say this is only activated when you attack someone. since well I'm sure alot of people want to keep there farms..
Thats just my opinon.
- CABAL
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:44 am
- Alliance: Aquila Ignis
- Race: Death Watch
- ID: 0
- Location: Holy Terra
Re: Max's suggestion thread...
Ugh! Why can't people juust use normal text...
Anyways, but that would only benefit the first striker.
Anyways, but that would only benefit the first striker.
MS-1 -> T-26 -> T-46 -> T-28 -> KV -> KV-3 -> IS -> IS-3 -> IS-4 -> IS-7