Well let me explain a few things first...
I have made myself and used this sig: [spoiler]
[/spoiler](and before you read the lower part please think of a thing that breakes the rules, I'm sure that if you will first think of it before you'll read the lower part you'll see that if one thing was meant to look like something in a way Jack described, you'd see it in first go)
Used it for about 14 days I think and yesterday I saw a message from Jack saying that I need to remove it immediatly cause it breakes 2 rules and that I've recieved a warning point...
I said OK, as you can see there's a girl which's lying and the other girl grabbed her for her underwear and pulled it up so a part of her ass is seen on the sig - I thought that was the case...Well if I recieved a warning for such thing, why shouldn't Lord-RahL get one for a sig that contains much more nudity than mine does...so I PM'd Jack back and said that if I get a warning point for this, so should Lord-RahL get one for a sig which contains much more nudity
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]Jack replied to me with:
Rahl's sig has been discussed by the mod team, and has been decided that it should be allowed, however your sig contains a filtered word "**Filtered**", as well as a cartoon dildo.
I was like WTH, a cartoon dildo? Then after watching my sig, which I made (surely I'd know where it'd be if I drew it there or smth like that), about 3 times, I saw that countries that are blown away from Europe have a SIMILIAR (not the same) shape as a dildo which, dunno, was used in some cartoons? Of course the countries weren't drew with microscopic accuration as you can't draw something to look the same as in a map as the ones you draw are far less accurate...You'll also notice a word "**Filtered**" in my sig which isn't written with big font - reason wasn't to hide the word but cus there isn't enough space...Yeah "**Filtered**" is there for a reason, we all know that c0ck (sorry mods, in a PM with Jack I saw it filters it if there's 'o' instead of '0' and need to get arround this filter now, I hope I won't get another warning for this lol) can mean also male chicken and chicken is an often term you adress a coward, an insult for cowards you might say (and cus these countries in my sig didn't fight back they are cowards)...so yeah to spare some place I've written "**Filtered**" instead of "chickens" or "cowards" there...
So I asked Jack to discuss my sig with the rest of the mod team, create a forum there or something, because he said that RahL's sig was discussed by mod TEAM (thought that meant all the mods but later found out that not all the mods were even included in the talk) and if mine's questionable aswell (even tho, RahL's has much MUCH more nudity, only a part of intime parts of the body is covered) why shouldn't mine get discussed aswell, afterall, we're all equal...
Jack's reply was that my sig was reported by another mod (yeah after 14 days probably and I'm sure a lot of mods've seen it) and that he asked a few other mods and they agreed...
They didn't even hear MY part of the story which explains EVERYTHING...
I said that I cannot exactly trust him on the word (I only trust my friends) and asked him again if he could make a thread in mod's place and that I'll ask a mod whom I know to vertify me the existance of the thread...
Then Jack said that RahL's sig wasn't discussed by all the mods (well I'm sorry but quite a few mods were/are biased from FUALL, I gotta applaude Mordack for not being one of them, there're probably a few more that aren't biased but majority is so it's only reasonable for them to say it's OK for RahL to use his sig) and that RahL and mines are very diffrent (well yeah they are, his includes a woman with only a part of her breast and a part of "bikini" place is covered while mine includes a word "**Filtered**" (which at the time of registration I didn't know was filtred word) which has nothing to do with penises and a shape similiar to dildo, which I haven't seen it while making it nor while checking it to make sure everything's ok after I made it, hell even a few of my friends didn't see it but if you want you can interpratate anything you want in a way you want, for instance I can interprate this smily:
as a smily who isn't whistling but giving a bl0w j0b [sorry mods again, just giving a very obvious example] thus breaking forum rules)Now I'd like you people to tell me, is Jack's interpretation of the sig wrong or not and if RahL deserved the honour that his sig is discussed by mod team and can still have it, even tho it clearly is pornographic, why shouldn't I deserve it? I mean we're all supposed to be equal, and are, except for those that have double standarts, doesn't matter how long do we have forum or ingame accounts or in what alliances we are
Sorry for the long post and please don't spam this thread, if you have something constructive to say, say it, if not then please don't post at all
