Mordack wrote:First of all, this isn't a case of "certain mods" being anything. The decision to take a tough stance on FUALL/TJP threads was made as a collective, and with input from all three admin. Please don't lynch individual moderators for only doing what they've been told to.
Secondly, I think the topic of a possible end to the war, or a mediation process, falls somewhat squarely under the header of "general war discussion." I don't see how anybody can argue otherwise. Any of the posts made in the closed thread would have been welcome in the official one, thereby negating your point about deliberate censorship.
Sorry but I did not single out any mods (i did say certain as that all I see posting) can u show me any name of any mod I singled out. Now secondly I am not privy to the private workings of the mod team so if u took the decision as a whole then the mod team of the forum are being to extreme.
Now also I only posted my opinion so that this issue could be discussed, if any mod is taking it personally, it was not the intention and I would prefer you to take the insinuation that I did back.
On the fact that the peace thing could be discussed in one thread, yes, it might be able to but personally, I think that if everything was in one thread that it would cause confusion. (You do not see everyone who wants to sell ats posting in one thread if they did it would be a very confusing system).
again I iterate that I did not mean to single out mods if u think I did (I didn't) and even if I did what is the purpose of the feedback forum if I could not discuss the actions they carry out. I did not get personal in anyway, remember the community is not here to serve ye but ye to serve the community. In general, I think the forum team do a good job but I still think that on this occasion the MOD TEAM is using overkill.
sgtdiesalot