Remove the 500b naq/100m army rule

[Duderanch]

I can't see a reason for it to be in the game to be honest. It makes large strike farming or just farming active accounts less profitable than farming 0 def accounts.

With a war set and 15 turn attack you should be able get 100% of naq.

[Support]

Only way I would consider it is with war-war.. a simple war set would nullify the effect across the board.

Sharing is caring.

[Duderanch]

How about raising it from 500b to say 2t? That way you still can't take 100t in one hit but still makes farming more reasonable.

[doc holliday]

[Field Marshall]

Agree.

You cannot farm above 20t defence. Too many huge incomes.

I saw a 12t naq on a 40t defence...you can't touch it though as losses would be above the 2t gain...

Too many people with huge defence and logging in once every week.

[Kikaz]

How about raising it from 500b to say 2t? That way you still can't take 100t in one hit but still makes farming more reasonable.

This..

At least double it to 1t/100m

[JasonJay]

Stop the cap after 150 mil army, you shouldn't be protected after that

[~Dä Vinci~]

50m = 500b

100m = 1.5t

150m = 2t

200m = 2.5t

250m = 3t

300m = 3.5t

350m = 4t

400m = 4.5t

500m = 5t

600m = 7.5t


war set from one side = 150% the amount taken

war-war = 300% taken

[IFLuX]

50m = 500b

100m = 1.5t

150m = 2t

200m = 2.5t

250m = 3t

300m = 3.5t

350m = 4t

400m = 4.5t

500m = 5t

600m = 7.5t


war set from one side = 150% the amount taken

war-war = 300% taken

Nice one indeed!

[Juliette]

war set from one side = 150% the amount taken
war-war = 300% taken

You will never get more than what the person has available.
War set from one side will not affect your thievery more than it does already.

The numbers themselves seem more reasonable.

[dastupy]

war set from one side = 150% the amount taken
war-war = 300% taken

You will never get more than what the person has available.
War set from one side will not affect your thievery more than it does already.

The numbers themselves seem more reasonable.

Jul, he ment
50 mill army -> 500 bill but with war set from them on you-> 150% -> 750 bill
double war ->300% -> 1.5 trill

[Juliette]

That makes far more sense than how I read it. Thanks Das.

[~Dä Vinci~]

war set from one side = 150% the amount taken
war-war = 300% taken

You will never get more than what the person has available.
War set from one side will not affect your thievery more than it does already.

The numbers themselves seem more reasonable.

Jul, he ment
50 mill army -> 500 bill but with war set from them on you-> 150% -> 750 bill
double war ->300% -> 1.5 trill

indeedey

[Richard B Riddick]

While i do agree there should be limits i do think givin the current game play they are a bit low, these were good back when income planets were still weak, and defenses were a lot smaller, i think the limits should be double what they are now, that sounds fair to me tbh

[~Odin~]

While i do agree there should be limits i do think givin the current game play they are a bit low, these were good back when income planets were still weak, and defenses were a lot smaller, i think the limits should be double what they are now, that sounds fair to me tbh

Double might be okay. I did try farming with a 40tril strike and it was more of a pain then farming 0 defences I must admit. However you don't want to tweak it to much of course.

war/war I would agree with 100% Juliette