ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

Forum for all general ingame discussion.
Post Reply
General Disorder
Forum Expert
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:33 pm
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

close this topic or move it to Galactic coloseum. Alls people are doing is nagging back and forth. TLE just sounds dumb CoP was a way cooler name. And TL are hippocrits cause they whined so much about the CoP and now yes they are trying to do the same thing. I am really wishing I never Fought for CIA now. :(
User avatar
Sarif
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:23 am
ID: 0
Location: England!!!

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

They arnt doing anything like on the scale of COP, what are you talking about....yes theyre building a large alliance, and the incorporation of other alliances is the obvious way to build numbers, but COP was 3 of the top alliances all together, and they all had training alliances at least.
So unless TLE have 6 + alliances all under their control and all have a good deal of power then your talking rubbish.
Everything that has a beginning has an end!!
The purpose of life is to end.
Image
General Disorder
Forum Expert
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:33 pm
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

Sarif wrote:They arnt doing anything like on the scale of COP, what are you talking about....yes theyre building a large alliance, and the incorporation of other alliances is the obvious way to build numbers, but COP was 3 of the top alliances all together, and they all had training alliances at least.
So unless TLE have 6 + alliances all under their control and all have a good deal of power then your talking rubbish.


rofl look who is talking rubish. (You are very lucky forum rules prevent me from insulting your intelligence right now.) The chief complant was they have too much power and abuse it. Ummm... I can remember some topics where TL has been just as bad if not worse than CoP. TL are Hippocrits and The only reason they don't have top 3 alliances is because no alliance in the top 3 is stupid enough to sign-on the I want to be an idiot Empire. I say What TL is doing ought to void the ban on CoP. And hopefully CoP will not include DO or any other unpleasant alliance. It is almost as if TL is laughing at SGW right now for elimanating their compitition cause since I got back Alpha, DDE and even Omega Have been the first to express concern and offer help haven't seen too many TL members
User avatar
Raven
Forum Elite
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:35 am
ID: 0
Location: The Netherlands

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

gregort77 wrote:
Sarif wrote:They arnt doing anything like on the scale of COP, what are you talking about....yes theyre building a large alliance, and the incorporation of other alliances is the obvious way to build numbers, but COP was 3 of the top alliances all together, and they all had training alliances at least.
So unless TLE have 6 + alliances all under their control and all have a good deal of power then your talking rubbish.


rofl look who is talking rubish. (You are very lucky forum rules prevent me from insulting your intelligence right now.) The chief complant was they have too much power and abuse it. Ummm... I can remember some topics where TL has been just as bad if not worse than CoP. TL are Hippocrits and The only reason they don't have top 3 alliances is because no alliance in the top 3 is stupid enough to sign-on the I want to be an idiot Empire. I say What TL is doing ought to void the ban on CoP. And hopefully CoP will not include DO or any other unpleasant alliance. It is almost as if TL is laughing at SGW right now for elimanating their compitition cause since I got back Alpha, DDE and even Omega Have been the first to express concern and offer help haven't seen too many TL members



We have TL,TC and TG.......every alliance has 2 or more alliances as their sister/training alliance, what are you talking about reforming CoP :lol:

So what we just sat back while you 'eliminated the competition? i can go through your whole post cause its full of holes but you know what, your to sad to even consider posting more on
Former Member of The Legion
'Terrorists of SGW'
User avatar
Mordack
The Spider
Posts: 4814
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:37 pm
ID: 8500
Location: Underneath the spreading chestnut tree

Honours and Awards

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

A coalition is fundamentally different to an empire.

Coalition:

"An alliance, especially a temporary one, of people, factions, parties, or nations."

Empire:

"A political unit having an extensive territory or comprising a number of territories or nations and ruled by a single supreme authority."

I think those definitions, courtesty of dictionary.com, help to illustrate the difference. TLE isn't a coalition because it's all effectively the same entity, run by the same people. COP, conversely, was three different alliances all controlled by three different leaderships. So no, what's happening here isn't the same at all.
"I bet you thought you'd seen the last of me.."

(TB)
User avatar
Raven
Forum Elite
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:35 am
ID: 0
Location: The Netherlands

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

Mordack wrote:A coalition is fundamentally different to an empire.

Coalition:

"An alliance, especially a temporary one, of people, factions, parties, or nations."

Empire:

"A political unit having an extensive territory or comprising a number of territories or nations and ruled by a single supreme authority."

I think those definitions, courtesty of dictionary.com, help to illustrate the difference. TLE isn't a coalition because it's all effectively the same entity, run by the same people. COP, conversely, was three different alliances all controlled by three different leaderships. So no, what's happening here isn't the same at all.


Tx for explaining it to him pffff......i think some people get confused by everything and assume things before actually knowing them....
Former Member of The Legion
'Terrorists of SGW'
General Disorder
Forum Expert
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:33 pm
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

hmmm I too sad? rofl , Well you can think what you want if you can even think at all. Not gonna say why you are unable to go thru my entire post(i sure can guess though) You have nothing to say (itellegent at least) about it cause you know I am right. Man I am really holding back after your unintellent post. How old are you,5?

And I tried to find empire rankings and coalition rankings. Guess what couldn't find either.As far as I can tellThe 3 alliances TL is claiming are infact 3 different alliances. Along with all the other so called training alliances butt buddy alliances and the power rangers alliances. Man no conection at all. Hmmmm maybe cause their isn't supposed to be. Of course I better ask Waven first
Last edited by General Disorder on Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sarif
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:23 am
ID: 0
Location: England!!!

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

Is it me or do we have 3 members from different views, a member from EPA, TL and Omega have disagreed with your comments...yet you are still arguing your right and we're all talking rubbish. Or am i just taking this the wrong way...
Everything that has a beginning has an end!!
The purpose of life is to end.
Image
User avatar
__StRiDeR__
Forum Grunt
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:52 pm
Race: Tollan
ID: 28815
Location: Every where lol

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

Mordack wrote:A coalition is fundamentally different to an empire.


I think is interesting you used the word "fundamentally". It reminds me of something I was talking abut in another topic just alittle while ago.

I really don't understand the draw of this topic. Omega and ETL have really said nothing new here yet your all going on about it. If others want Coalitions or Empires I say let them. As it should add more fun to the game when they battle.
General Disorder
Forum Expert
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:33 pm
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

__StRiDeR__ wrote:
Mordack wrote:A coalition is fundamentally different to an empire.


I think is interesting you used the word "fundamentally". It reminds me of something I was talking abut in another topic just alittle while ago.

I really don't understand the draw of this topic. Omega and ETL have really said nothing new here yet your all going on about it. If others want Coalitions or Empires I say let them. As it should add more fun to the game when they battle.


This is what I was tryiong to stress. If TL want's to gripe about someone forming a "coalition" Then how are they going to form an Empire? duh neither exists in SGW. CoP was inventive and now TL is also but why take away CoPs idea if they can keep there own well copying DDE's idea. The more ideas the better and CoP vs CIA was fun.
User avatar
__StRiDeR__
Forum Grunt
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:52 pm
Race: Tollan
ID: 28815
Location: Every where lol

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

gregort77 wrote:
__StRiDeR__ wrote:
Mordack wrote:A coalition is fundamentally different to an empire.


I think is interesting you used the word "fundamentally". It reminds me of something I was talking abut in another topic just alittle while ago.

I really don't understand the draw of this topic. Omega and ETL have really said nothing new here yet your all going on about it. If others want Coalitions or Empires I say let them. As it should add more fun to the game when they battle.


This is what I was tryiong to stress. If TL want's to gripe about someone forming a "coalition" Then how are they going to form an Empire? duh neither exists in SGW. CoP was inventive and now TL is also but why take away CoPs idea if they can keep there own well copying DDE's idea. The more ideas the better and CoP vs CIA was fun.


Don't take my post. I'm not in anyway agreeing with you. My post deals with the topic and something alittle bit off the topic. But has nothing to do with your topic thats in this topic. That I must say is well off topic.
Boooby
Forum Regular
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:38 pm
ID: 96133
Location: galapagos island

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

gregort77 wrote:
__StRiDeR__ wrote:
Mordack wrote:A coalition is fundamentally different to an empire.


I think is interesting you used the word "fundamentally". It reminds me of something I was talking abut in another topic just alittle while ago.

I really don't understand the draw of this topic. Omega and ETL have really said nothing new here yet your all going on about it. If others want Coalitions or Empires I say let them. As it should add more fun to the game when they battle.


This is what I was tryiong to stress. If TL want's to gripe about someone forming a "coalition" Then how are they going to form an Empire? duh neither exists in SGW. CoP was inventive and now TL is also but why take away CoPs idea if they can keep there own well copying DDE's idea. The more ideas the better and CoP vs CIA was fun.


dude, were u even in the war?

Heres the lowdown gregort

TL in the beggining of the war fought because (now heres where u pay attention) CoP's/Omega's farming policy. They did NOT participated because they dont like ''coalitions'', its because of their farming policies and CoP's farming policies. The CIA, which consisted of many alliances, had that view, not TL

So TL could do whatever they want.
FREE THE BOOBIES (Sula nebouxii)
General Disorder
Forum Expert
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:33 pm
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

Ok Strider I'll use your post or anyone elses that I want. Got it? And as for you Booooooby I was in the war. I was very active in the war and reading forums. But I really don't remember you, and who can forget a name like that. So just take your nose and go sniff somewhere else.
General Disorder
Forum Expert
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:33 pm
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

OK look, I was just trying to pick fights to increase alliance rep. I appollogize I realize I need to move on. My friends and strangers have donated more than my own alliance so just forget everything I said ok.
AI_
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:54 pm

Re: ATTN: ALL wannabe Empires

skimmed this topic, and i just want to make it clear once again Dirty Dozen is not an empire, we are one unit.
Dirty Dozen Command Staff
Image
Post Reply

Return to “StarGateWars General”