Mothership vs Ascension

Locked
RobinInDaHood
Forum Elite
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:39 am
Race: Vulpes
ID: 75697
Location: Da Hood, of course

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

heh. Nice update Jason. You just sealed my fate for a whole pile of ascensions even though I was wavering on whether or not to pull the trigger.

Now I just need 150K UP and I'm golden. 70K to go... ;)
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Forum Addict
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
ID: 0

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

YAY robins fleets can still be there same with my crappy MS too
User avatar
Antius
Forum Regular
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:05 am

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

Crappy? nah...

Non-existant? Yep!
Id=66719
REK
Forever Evil
Posts: 7511
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:04 am
Alliance: THE DARK DOMINIUM EMPIRE
Race: GOD ALLMIGHTY
ID: 666
Alternate name(s): THEY'RE NO STRINGS ON ME
Location: MIAMI (DOMINATED PLANET EARTH)
Contact:

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

:shock:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
cimi
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:49 am
ID: 85529
Location: Slovenia

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

hmm thinking.... Sux ... this is my opinion.
Mato
Forum Expert
Posts: 1340
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:34 am
ID: 0
Location: rome

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

great update ... now I can actaully invest tons of naq in my MS. (my MS will pass 20bil power for the first time ..yay)
User avatar
Madness81
Forum Irregular
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:44 am

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

my god this is a sweet update.. its like a dream come true. ....looks for i love admin bumper sticker....
Image
User avatar
Tivadar
Forum Regular
Posts: 724
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:02 am
Alliance: [TCOA]Equinox
Race: Altíri
ID: 0
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

YEEEEHAAAA!!!!

lubb ya admin :D
eragorn
Forum Grunt
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:22 am

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

should only keep the slots not the actuall weapons. Buying them will not take that long if you know how to play, but keeping a full MS will hurt the game. Now when you ascend and come back you gotta build up again, but with this you have a huge def right off the bat. People will just put everything into MS cause no need to have an attack can just boost MS forever. train all UU into covert / miners an use MS for def and attack and will just keep getting stronger.
Manetheren
Forum Elite
Posts: 1513
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:31 am
Alliance: Tauri Alliance
Race: Ancient
ID: 0

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

eragorn wrote:should only keep the slots not the actuall weapons. Buying them will not take that long if you know how to play, but keeping a full MS will hurt the game. Now when you ascend and come back you gotta build up again, but with this you have a huge def right off the bat. People will just put everything into MS cause no need to have an attack can just boost MS forever. train all UU into covert / miners an use MS for def and attack and will just keep getting stronger.


You still need an attack or defense or the ms doesnt do anything besides engage your opponents ms.
eragorn
Forum Grunt
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:22 am

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

is there a min amount of attackers/ defenders? if not then all you would need would be 1 of each, Should at least require min amount of attackers / defenders or the ship won't come. tie it o a % of total army size like must have 5% of army be trained as supers with weapons or the ship just stays home. Same with def. Could also change cost of fleets to include a pilot so each fleet you replace or buy would also cost 1 UU or maybe a new player type like a pilot that must be trained first to some stupid class like navigator (basic) then pilot (super) and that each fleet ship requires a pilot and navigator or two trained pilots (for better attack power) so the fleets would be better if 2 pilots per ship then if pilot and navigator. Possibly also have a range of ship types (like weapons with diff ships worth more in attack, although still limited to what the fleet will actually attack i.e. planet stealing or MS vrs MS only and no ground support form fleets.
RobinInDaHood
Forum Elite
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:39 am
Race: Vulpes
ID: 75697
Location: Da Hood, of course

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

eragorn wrote:is there a min amount of attackers/ defenders? if not then all you would need would be 1 of each, Should at least require min amount of attackers / defenders or the ship won't come. tie it o a % of total army size like must have 5% of army be trained as supers with weapons or the ship just stays home. Same with def. Could also change cost of fleets to include a pilot so each fleet you replace or buy would also cost 1 UU or maybe a new player type like a pilot that must be trained first to some stupid class like navigator (basic) then pilot (super) and that each fleet ship requires a pilot and navigator or two trained pilots (for better attack power) so the fleets would be better if 2 pilots per ship then if pilot and navigator. Possibly also have a range of ship types (like weapons with diff ships worth more in attack, although still limited to what the fleet will actually attack i.e. planet stealing or MS vrs MS only and no ground support form fleets.


Way too complicated. :shock:
User avatar
GeneralChaos
Forum Addict
Posts: 3421
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:56 pm
Alliance: Omega
ID: 59627

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

The MS doesnt need to lose anything, it does not count towards GnR anymore, so it makes no difference.
Deep within Noob Cave, you find a strange pool filled with a glowing blue liquid. You think back to what your mother told you about unfamiliar liquids found in caves.

You're pretty sure she said "Drink it! What's the worst that can happen?"
Ston
Forum Irregular
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:21 am
Alliance: Omega Allegiance
Race: Ascended Stone
ID: 13514

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

bad update, is raising inflation of naq in main cause no anq is being drawn out of the game, soon we will have someone breaking the trillion MS action and main is slowly becoming more and more like chaos (which so many of us simply "dislike").
RobinInDaHood
Forum Elite
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:39 am
Race: Vulpes
ID: 75697
Location: Da Hood, of course

Re: Mothership vs Ascension

Ston wrote:bad update, is raising inflation of naq in main cause no anq is being drawn out of the game, soon we will have someone breaking the trillion MS action and main is slowly becoming more and more like chaos (which so many of us simply "dislike").


I'm fine with making mother ship fleet hangers disappear during ascension as long as you're willing to concede the loss of all planet defenses during ascension.

It was not fair for people to boost their planet defenses to unlimited levels and lose none of that in ascension while the cost of building fleets was huge due to being reset after each ascension. Admin is trying to make ascending attractive again to those who have already spent dozens of trillions of naq in their mother ships (like me).

I say again, great update Admin.
Locked

Return to “For Admin Archives”