Officer attack logs

[Clarkey]

I have just noticed that the officers attack logs now do not show the strength of the attacker who attacks your officer. Or the strength of the defence of someone your officer attacks.

I take it this is an update not a bug?
Sorry if I missed the discussion on this if there was one?

[Sphinx42]

Attacks on Others - Damage to Officer is still there, but Attacks on Officer - Damage to Officer is missing

[Clarkey]

Oh yeah, i didn't noticed that... so it's only on the attacks on officer bit!

[Milenko]

Mine is different. Damage by officer has swapped with damage to officer. So according to this attack log, someone whose strike is 1/4 of my officers def just took 2bil naq

[Sphinx42]

There's obviously a small update coming

[Zeratul]

actually, to us, it looks like the officer def part is taken out, but not removed from the thingy at top...

this we believe because our officer has 3 hits total: 175, 93, 212
and it wouldnt be natural to sell and rebuy that much defense in a matter of days...

also, officer defense is possible to find out another way... so no real need to show it...

[Informer]

i also am not seeing the full details on my officer logs, which is quite annoying in the sence that i dont know the attack reaching my officer and the appropriate responce

obviosuly someone with a high attack would have to be asked nicely,

and someone with a low attack can be intimidated

to make me feel big, lol

[Turkey]

I got really confused by this the other day in my officers logs;


Oct 03, 2007 HARKLE 32,169,475,057 Naquadah stolen 15 2,003 2,650 2,613,863,137,428

He had just ascended, dunno where that value of 2.6Tril defense came from cos he had 0 defense lol. Also HARKLE's attack strength was not in the log.

EDIT: When I look closer at my officers logs I notice that every attack on him is similar to this. His defense strength is just some random number which changes every time and is no where close to his actualy defense.

[Clarkey]

I think you'll find it is the officers defence strength that has been removed. That 2.6tril strength you mentioned would be the attacker not the defender.

[Turkey]

nope, its under damage by officer.

For me, damage to officer is missing

[Clarkey]

Yes I understand that, but I think that the damage by officer column has been removed and the damage to officer has moved along one, but the headings haven't moved!

[Zeratul]

Yes I understand that, but I think that the damage by officer column has been removed and the damage to officer has moved along one, but the headings haven't moved!

we said much the same earlier...

also, that would correspond with how our officer's defense is... defense of an officer just doesnt fluctuate by 70% between single attacks...

[Clarkey]

we said much the same earlier...

also, that would correspond with how our officer's defense is... defense of an officer just doesnt fluctuate by 70% between single attacks...

Nope, unless the defence are on drugs!