Have ATs in main be like in assencion
- The Iron Duke
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:00 pm
- Alliance: Nemesis Novus
- ID: 1915260
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
It'll pretty much destroy the military role of this game as people become tight fisted with turns.

Destroyer of Worlds, Defender of Noobs, Dan Dan the Dustbin Man!

Spoiler


-
Teal'auc of the Void
- Stubborn Tok'ra
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:22 am
- Alliance: MaYHeM
- Race: Tenno SKOOM
- ID: 38133
- Location: Origin System
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
Tok`ra wrote:So in other words, people fight strategicly instead of acting like a drunken berserker.
This is not strategical game. I like and want to mass like berserker when I feel up to it.
Teal'auc
Nothing but a whisper from past...
I like, totes need a nice signature. But I'm lazy to put one in. Just imagine one.
I like, totes need a nice signature. But I'm lazy to put one in. Just imagine one.
- TacticalCommander
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:51 am
- Race: Saige
- ID: 8742
- Location: somewhere.....elsewhere....anywhere
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
Why are you suggesting this.. Its already implemented via
PURGATORY
Thats right folks
PURGATORY
Pergatory has 1 AT generation, and no transfering them in any way.
Army size too big? Not a problem just sell off that extra UU for extra naq, $$, kill them off, or give be a kind soul and give the UU to one smaller than you (LIKE ME
).
So if you want limited AT, then come to the part of the game that has that
PURGATORY
But wait, do you think there are lots of people, like 500 or so who want limited AT and don't want to lose large army sizes?
Then ask the admin to create PURGATORY 2
In effort to allow the admin as little work as possible, there will only be 2 differences between these purgatories.,
First, the max 25(did that get changed to 50?) million army size you will have a minimum 25 million army size.
2nd difference is since this suppose to a more permanent style of play, while the first week will allow free changes between realms, after that the realms will have drifted too far apart and will result in 30 days worth (instead of 5) of AT to switch (going BOTH ways).
TC
Disclaimer, having 500 people sign to go into pugratory 2 doesn't guarantee that the admin will make another purg. Admin is in no way obligated to make Purgatory 2 even if 500 people vote for it. Additional differense between purgs can be suggest but as before Admin will be under no obligation to do them and more differense you request resulting in more work for him will only hinder your chances of purgatory 2.
Any starting chances of getting purgatory 2 are guaranteed.
PURGATORY
Thats right folks
PURGATORY
Pergatory has 1 AT generation, and no transfering them in any way.
Army size too big? Not a problem just sell off that extra UU for extra naq, $$, kill them off, or give be a kind soul and give the UU to one smaller than you (LIKE ME
).So if you want limited AT, then come to the part of the game that has that
PURGATORY
But wait, do you think there are lots of people, like 500 or so who want limited AT and don't want to lose large army sizes?
Then ask the admin to create PURGATORY 2
In effort to allow the admin as little work as possible, there will only be 2 differences between these purgatories.,
First, the max 25(did that get changed to 50?) million army size you will have a minimum 25 million army size.
2nd difference is since this suppose to a more permanent style of play, while the first week will allow free changes between realms, after that the realms will have drifted too far apart and will result in 30 days worth (instead of 5) of AT to switch (going BOTH ways).
TC
Disclaimer, having 500 people sign to go into pugratory 2 doesn't guarantee that the admin will make another purg. Admin is in no way obligated to make Purgatory 2 even if 500 people vote for it. Additional differense between purgs can be suggest but as before Admin will be under no obligation to do them and more differense you request resulting in more work for him will only hinder your chances of purgatory 2.
Any starting chances of getting purgatory 2 are guaranteed.
Last edited by TacticalCommander on Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:12 am, edited 2 times in total.
GLORY TO THE GOD ALMIGHTY!
I am not being aggressive, I am being dominant.


I am not being aggressive, I am being dominant.


-
Teal'auc of the Void
- Stubborn Tok'ra
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:22 am
- Alliance: MaYHeM
- Race: Tenno SKOOM
- ID: 38133
- Location: Origin System
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
I find myself agreeing with TC here. 
Teal'auc
Teal'auc
Nothing but a whisper from past...
I like, totes need a nice signature. But I'm lazy to put one in. Just imagine one.
I like, totes need a nice signature. But I'm lazy to put one in. Just imagine one.
-
Teal'auc of the Void
- Stubborn Tok'ra
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:22 am
- Alliance: MaYHeM
- Race: Tenno SKOOM
- ID: 38133
- Location: Origin System
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
Tok`ra wrote:Why not just return purgatory to its origonal plan of anyone being able to enter.
Yeah, then these who want 1 at per turn and no trading would be feeded and those who want to mass like drunken berserk would be happy too... haha
Teal'auc
Nothing but a whisper from past...
I like, totes need a nice signature. But I'm lazy to put one in. Just imagine one.
I like, totes need a nice signature. But I'm lazy to put one in. Just imagine one.
- TacticalCommander
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:51 am
- Race: Saige
- ID: 8742
- Location: somewhere.....elsewhere....anywhere
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
Didn't know was suppose to be, but I'm sure the admin had his reasons for restricting the original purgatory to begin with and that those reasons still apply. But if he would rather simply open up purgatory to everyone that is his choice.
GLORY TO THE GOD ALMIGHTY!
I am not being aggressive, I am being dominant.


I am not being aggressive, I am being dominant.


- Dagr
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:24 pm
- Race: Asgard
- ID: 50627
- Alternate name(s): Day
- Location: U.S.A.
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
I think pergatory should be done away with and have your idea implemented.
-
Mystake
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:40 pm
- Alliance: Dominium of Chaos
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 50147
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Have ATs in main be like in assencion
i like AT's like in ascended
the lower ranks get more then the higher ranks!
the lower ranks get more then the higher ranks!
TRADE FEEDBACK - I am an A+ trader! Safest $ trades in all of SGW. I do escrow services too!
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=83709
Former member of what became the Alliance of the Year of 2009, Nemesis Sect.


http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=83709
Former member of what became the Alliance of the Year of 2009, Nemesis Sect.

Mathlord wrote:The Reclaimer has been descended as a result of the battle!!!
Good times
