Tok`ra wrote:http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp
As you can see, the average screen width is a LOT bigger.
More importantly, until the fourm upgrade there was no real issue with pic size (aside from occasional abuse, or crying just to cry)
Who thinks the limit should be recended or increased ?
Tok`ra wrote:Thres a 600 pixel width limit on any pic posted, its an automatic fourm feature that came in with the fourm update.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
You can add the screen shot as an attachment [...]
Attachments can be managed by users from here:
http://www.herebegames.com/StarGateWars ... ttachments
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Tok`ra wrote:Spacey wrote:Tok'ra there are people that are trying to work with you, but
all you've said is:
(1) I like it the old way
(2) I'm annoyed
(3) and insulted someone, if anyone, who put the limit on
It may be just my perspective in this issue, but the argument for this change seems very weak...
are there substantial points?
1- your a **Filtered** that doesnt botehr to read posts it seems.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp
Read teh link in my inital post, average screen resolution is WAYYYYYYYYY bigger.
Dunno what the SGW fourms avg resolution is, last I heard from smoosh he was going to g et bazsy to see if the fourm recorded that data.
2- Damn skippy Im annoied, it used to be a lot better before the upgrade
which leads to
3- As I recall, its a standard feature for this version of php, basicly its the defualt setting that noone botherd to change.
4- One again if you had BOTHERD to read the thread isntead of just **Filtered** to me, you woulda seen suggestions, such as making the software limit be 1500 pixels, but enforcing a smaller limit in most cases (with the exception being pic threads, screencap threads, spam temple, etc etc)
That way, larger is possible, but common sense must be used when posting.
In summary: Spacey is an ass that is incapable of even READING a thread before commenting.
Wolf359 wrote:The average screen width may be bigger - but, the forum isn't. The forum is designed for a smaller width and it's current size ensures that it fits all screen resolutions.
Why the need to post larger images anyway, can't they simply be resized before posting?
