@Jake
I think the point that sva is tryn to make.. even thoug ppl misinterpretate it for a threat is this...
A NAP (at least from our side) was based on good faith and a posible more friendly future relationship. Thus IF having an option of not doing something to harm the other side you take it.
now i personaly dont see trading as a way to harm.. as long as rates are normal rates.. its traiding... but aperently thats my personal belif...
but if you look at it from a different perspective not so long ago.. some of our lads were tryn to descend tweety i think... than HE sold tweety dmu.. thus preventing our guys from descending her... Its true she could have gotten the dmu elswhere... but still For me personaly.. if some1 in omega was tryn to descend some1 that i know they were in war with... and he came to me asking for a dmu deal.. i d reject it... i also rejected spy recons when there was a war going on not so long ago.. but thats just me...
True its not written anywhere, but i guess it depends on the type of person more or less... So basicly the q is would you like the same cirkumstances if our roles were reversed? EG you fighting some1 and us selling them dmu so preventing their "total demise" (all hipotetical talking ofcourse)... IF you say no, than i sugest you dont trade, if you say yeah than trade away, but when you can probably expect vice versa in return.
And aperently this thread will be known for something else.. for first time i think i ll might be going back on my word.. as repulsed as i am bymyself doing that i m actualy considering it as the preasure rises
anyways again. sva you as the author of the post, can you ask mods to close it so it doesnt stir up the pot too much ppl have been informed and that was your primary purpose i think... and you as always do as you see right even thoug i go crazy some time.. atm You ourank me and apernety i have to go by your will
