Going to war cost

[Wolf359]

What I mean by setting them to war is that it will deter them from attacking you - not that you should also attack them - because if both sides are set to war then the cost of war (weapon damage/troop loss) increases.

I agree that the idea of 'setting to war' is getting lost - it should mean 'we are having a proper war' and not just atatcking for naq. I have always taken this view myself - but as armies grow and costs of battle increase, many players (including me) are finding it increasingly necessary to set war to take maximum amounts of naq, cover our costs and make a profit.

[Elemental_FIRE]

I just sell all defence and then attack up.