Okay this is the RL logic you're suggesting:
I am being convicted of a crime, and I am on the jury of my own crime.
RL logic is this:
An official is elected - and promptly believes he's been insulted.
The official refuses to accept the other's explanation, and takes it to the press.
The people who elected him find (in the majority) that he was not justified in feeling insulted.
More importantly they find the official's willingness to explode over something so petty and childish, is clearly an indication that he is unsuited for the role they elected him to.
The authorities recognize this, and fire him.
Desperate to dig his hole deeper, he starts a blatantly tilted campaign attacking both his adversaries in the bureaucracy and public sphere with biased polls, and threats of physical violence.
---------------------------------------
At this point, he's already lost the rational argument... else we would have been agreeing with you in the first place, in that first thread. Five extra thread's worth of content is not going to change the fact you stand on an untenable position.
There really is nothing more to say.
You got upset over someone being PC - acted like a spoilt brat on MSN - and then confirmed Smooshable's decision to fire you in subsequent tantrums that reveal a character wholly unsuited for office.
I hold my representative to a much higher standards than the mods.
I do not expect them, and will not tolerate them, running about screaming "the voice of the community will not be silenced!" when the issue is their ego, and not the communities' well being.
------------
As for the mod polling... meh. I don't really care - even if the poll results pre-mod-adjusted was inverted, I would still find smooshable justified in booting you - though I would then join you in clamoring for his/other mods resignation.
Of course, I feel the mods are doing in most cases, an exemplary job.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
