I think A is getting pissed because they cant do anything.. for B is actually winning if u really see. since A has alot of big players with big incomes when they are massed B which has alot of small players can nicely farm them and grow.. but since B is small mostly, A has nothing to farm and they want to stop this for they knw they cant win this war.. Thats why they are trying to push B into surrendering for they knw that they are actually losing.. Maybe if A posts stats not on massing but on how big they got from army size to army size, because of the war and not because of the up.. we will see that B has players who have grown alot. and after they grow to a limit they als ocan start massing others since they got big account, now. So B is actually wining.
In short .. A cant grow much and are losing more because of this war than gaining because they are too big compared to B. and since B is mostly small players with alittle big guys to mass some defences down.. they are gaining and will start to show that there army size is growing and with a little lecture from the big guys they also can start massing down defences. so they will grow and mass and grow and mass.. like that. the only way A can defeat B is by surrendering. its sounds illogical but the only way to beat B is by surrendering to them.
to prove my time just see in all the topics they open they are tyring to push B into surrendering saying only because there defences are massed and they got more power. they dont realise that B doesnt need to mass them to farm there income they have alot more account which are massable and can get alot of naq. and A can do nothing about it..
unless i am missing sumthing and B is really inactive and only the big guys are active then i say no chance for B they must surrender before there merlin drops low or before there army size drops low. but if B is active then keep at it u will see improvement in your whole alliance. my 2 cents
