Forced War

[Eisen Feuer]

well ive been thinking a little bit and i have decided to throw an idea out there. Its been threes years since the game started and most everything has expanded exponentially. I think it would be pretty cool if a Forced War were implemented Admin decides what would be fun for them to watch duke it out and they declare wars for alliances and force them to fight both alliances would have to do certain damage to one another or face concequences say the required damage is 200 bil or more in damages or the alliance loses 25% of income or whatever it be! if still not fighting then 50% until the alliance complies! of course only the alliance that refuses to atk would be penalized. the forced war could last one-two weeks and this is just to let the alliances know ADMIN is still in charge lol! of course

[Wade Wilson]

uhh...wierd

[ThakalluS]

lol

[Omoc]

[danielv]

hmmm, if when you declare war to an alliance that took a % of the army size of the alliance exemple 1% of each player banked into a secure alliance war bank, who only alliance winner get.

This way, winner will get 1 % of the total army size of the enemy.
the winner get the 1% of the the losser.
your 1% are refounded

and the 1% is divided by all the alliance member.

the winner will be determined by the alliance war link.
Each war must have a end after 2 week of fight.

and you can reconduct it if you think the war isn't over.

By doing someting like that,
-you will be forced to fight ( not having 0 stats, and staying in the war)
-winner will get award.
-people will think of their lose before leaving alliance rank in war time.

[Wolf359]

2 sides being forces to fight kind of defeats the purpose of the game don't you think?

Besides, even if this were to be implemented in good faith, there would be inevitable calls of corruption and foul play from people, especially if certain alliances were put up against others. It is unworkable simply because of that fact and so gets a big NO from me.

[Rocky]

2 sides being forces to fight kind of defeats the purpose of the game don't you think?

Besides, even if this were to be implemented in good faith, there would be inevitable calls of corruption and foul play from people, especially if certain alliances were put up against others. It is unworkable simply because of that fact and so gets a big NO from me.

lol was just about to say that, wars are much more fun to fight when there is even a scratch of purpose behind it, like sticking up for your alliance mate for example, if there was a forced war, alliances would team together and scrape the minumum and work out a deal with each other if they really didn't want to fight, so its not really fun anymore if that happens.

[Lore]

this is open to so much abuse. Any of the "major" alliances could "force war" with 5 to 10 smaller alliances at once. Could easily become the new extortion tactic.

[Eisen Feuer]

well thats not where i was intending it to go here is my explanation!

1. wars are decided by the admin!
2. communication channels close if you are forced into war meaning the only people that can message you are those in your alliance! stopping the potential hey lets not fight agreement!
3. the bigger alliances will pick on the smaller ones deal can be prevented by only setting up alliances that are similarily matched!
4. Wolf i used to be in EPA with you back in the day nice to hear from you i understand it is a game and people have put alot into building their accounts! however everynow and then people need a new challenge in a game! This could be a stepping stone into an entire different lvl of play! having alliances build for coming wars that are completely random imagine the comradery that will be built many alliances have built such comradery but they never really get to test it out bc of the intimidation factor!
5. This game is called StargateWARS you dont see too many major wars anymore the last great one was the EPA and The Order to see those epic battles again would be a sight many of newer players have not seen!
6. I am sure with at least someof this information we could think of an idea that could eventually be converted into a working plan! I know my asgard606 account hasnt donated alot forum wise mainly cuz i have other responsibilites with my game account and alliance account as well!

give it more thought if some of you were willing to throw some suggetions in we could think of something that might make this work!

[Mukasa]

LOL!

[Angel_F1re]

well thats not where i was intending it to go here is my explanation!

1. wars are decided by the admin!

give it more thought if some of you were willing to throw some suggetions in we could think of something that might make this work!

That wouldn't happen.
Admin takes long enough to deal with account issues. I sincerely doubt he will give a crap about allowing an alliance to mass someone else.

[_Rube_Dragon_]

forcing peoepl to fight not a good idea i really personly always liekd to be rogeish anyways

[redneck]

well thats not where i was intending it to go here is my explanation!

1. wars are decided by the admin!

give it more thought if some of you were willing to throw some suggetions in we could think of something that might make this work!

That wouldn't happen.
Admin takes long enough to deal with account issues. I sincerely doubt he will give a crap about allowing an alliance to mass someone else.

while we're at it, why not send everyone in the other alliance a messege 2 weeks ahead of the war so they can untrain everything and go on nox and critical?