Special name for alliance leaders and second in command

[Fallout]

this new update for ppl who have played this game over 3 years made me think.
Always if i want to contact an alliance leader i have to go to "Alliance list" and find the alliance and then i can see who is alliance leader. makes me cry for moving my hand so much
how about alliance leaders and second in commands get "Alliance leader" or "Second in command" in front of their names the same way as Nano Primes. First Primes, Supreme Commanders. Prodigys etc.
it would make it simple to find alliance leaders and ppl who are second in command.

[Milenko]

I like the idea about alliance leaders, while you can find out who the alliance leader is by looking on the alliance page, you can't see who the 2IC is.
I think it would be a great update


(I am not agreeing with it just so I get a cool title)

[Mukasa]

maybe...maybe not....however i don't agree ppl who play for 3 yrs+ that get a special title-->many have accounts that were bought from guys who played for 3 yrs+ but the new owners might be playing only for few months...

but for 1ic and 2ic yeh...would be nice...

[Fallout]

maybe...maybe not....however i don't agree ppl who play for 3 yrs+ that get a special title-->many have accounts that were bought from guys who played for 3 yrs+ but the new owners might be playing only for few months...

but for 1ic and 2ic yeh...would be nice...

i have to agree with you on that. also some 3+years players have lousy accounts compared to some 6 months or EVEN less time played ppl do.
prehaps this new "title" should implanted some other way. prehaps army size?

bump for a great idea(my ideas are always great tho:P)

[Legendary Apophis]

maybe...maybe not....however i don't agree ppl who play for 3 yrs+ that get a special title-->many have accounts that were bought from guys who played for 3 yrs+ but the new owners might be playing only for few months...

but for 1ic and 2ic yeh...would be nice...

i have to agree with you on that. also some 3+years players have lousy accounts compared to some 6 months or EVEN less time played ppl do.
prehaps this new "title" should implanted some other way. prehaps army size?

No.
Not having title doesn't weaken anything in gameplay, so why bother? Oh yes giving it to biggest army sizes...then everyone goes to raid with spending cash on blackmarket for ATs or spends 350€ on the game for uu and poof half of the server gets titles in two monthes! I seriously don't see the problem with how things are at the moment. Very funny that it sounds being here for 3 years counts for nothing and only thing that counts is army size...yea again we come around the noob who bought his LG+1 account with 135mil army size and 1.5tril def recently and who moans because he doesn't have all what others have, and since he has big army from previous owner, gets the title, while being a rich noob, while some of long time players since-beginning get nothing.
VERY good idea indeed!

As for titles for command staff...well if mods are alliance leaders they'd get pretty big titles!!

[Zeratul]

something like this could possibly come whenever admin does that major update on the alliance system he has planned for a long time now...

[dardar]

wouldnt mind seeing this added to game.

[Lore]

I like it but think it needs to be optional. I know some 2IC that don't want to be, and are not puplicly known. Its a viable tactic.

[RevAngEl]

Alliance leaders can change, so when he's no longer a leader he would loose the name right?
As for the 2IC i don't know...that possition can change even more often and might be used only to get the nice name

[Legendary Apophis]

Well I am second in command, and I'm proud of it, and I remain there for several monthes by now, so, why not...

[Lore]

like i said, make it optional, or even make it usable after a set time period, say 30 days for leaders and 90 days for 2IC.

Also leaving that position should negate the title immediately.

[O Neills]

I like the idea a lot. But I agree that maybe it should be optional.

[Reschef]

me likes the idea.
Should also not be that hard to implement

[Twitchy]

Well I am second in command, and I'm proud of it, and I remain there for several monthes by now, so, why not...

yep same here and if your scared of showing who is in power in your alliance then well they shouldnt be in charge

[Lore]

Well I am second in command, and I'm proud of it, and I remain there for several monthes by now, so, why not...

yep same here and if your scared of showing who is in power in your alliance then well they shouldnt be in charge

If you think not showing who your main leaders truely are is out of fear, your making a foolish mistake.