Section 4d.
Image size.
Images larger than 600 pixels wide need to be posted inside of a ‘spoiler box’.
Consequence:
A mod will place your image inside a spoiler box. Repeat offenders will be given one warning point.
New Rule Discussion: Image size
-
smooshable
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:06 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
-
Honours and Awards
New Rule Discussion: Image size
Indu and proud of it!!
- Solus
- WAR POPE
- Posts: 14896
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:37 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Suspended in a world of Nightmares
-
Honours and Awards
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
smooshable wrote:Section 4d.
Image size.
Images larger than 600 pixels wide need to be posted inside of a ‘spoiler box’.
Consequence:
A mod will place your image inside a spoiler box. Repeat offenders will be given one warning point.
does this 600px dimension also apply to vertical size? at the moment it says '600 pixels wide' and is a little misleading, especially if your one to bend the rules to your favour.

Slim87R wrote:I think your Solus is showing.
Spoiler

Juliette wrote:Glory to the Solus.
Psyko wrote:You sick and twisted little Sol, you.![]()
Malx wrote:+1Noobert wrote:I love when Solus posts. It brightens my day because of how awesome he is.

Eärendil wrote:No, No I don't.SuperSaiyan wrote:Eärendil wrote:Making fun of SS in his faceits ok, you both love me more then existence itself anywayĔɱƿŷ wrote:Punching SS in his face
I love Solus.
And I even love Canadian Bacon more than you.
Radiance wrote:Oh my marriage-consummating deity.. that was awesome.
(F)(¯`• (F)¸·´¯)«§müg»™(¯`·¸(F) •´¯)(F) says (5:38 PM):
*who is solus?
Chris/Deviathan[EVE Online] says (5:38 PM):
*solus is god
*and he touches us all with his noodly appendage
[BoT] Eärendil :: Matt says (5:38 PM):
*solus is... better than raptor jesus
SuperSaiyan - Pirate says (10:25 PM):
*solus is out for blood
-
Zeratul
- Elder Administrator
- Posts: 23203
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
- Alliance: Lucian Alliance
- Race: Templar
- ID: 7
- Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha - Location: Nivlheim
-
Honours and Awards
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
it might be a good idea to forbid a certain height as well... say 2k pixels high...


"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."
Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
2k pixels high?????!!!!!
I'd say smaller - monitors with 2k vertical pixels are not that common, therefore what's the point?
I'd say smaller - monitors with 2k vertical pixels are not that common, therefore what's the point?
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
2k is quite a lot, for a 21inch monitor..
Maybe more like 600 as well or so?
Maybe more like 600 as well or so?

-
Zeratul
- Elder Administrator
- Posts: 23203
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:44 am
- Alliance: Lucian Alliance
- Race: Templar
- ID: 7
- Alternate name(s): Hrefna
Reitha - Location: Nivlheim
-
Honours and Awards
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
we said 2k to have it quite large, yet not too large... after all, it is common to scroll vertically for text and such, but not sideways...
the number was a random suggestion... its not as if our monitor is that large... (if it was, we'd have found some way to turn it sideways to get a wide screen...)
the number was a random suggestion... its not as if our monitor is that large... (if it was, we'd have found some way to turn it sideways to get a wide screen...)


"Great holy armies shall be gathered and trained to fight all who embrace evil. In the name of the gods, Browsers shall be changed to carry the internet out amongst the peoples and we will spread Firefox to all the unbelievers. The power of the Firefox will be felt far and wide and the wicked users of IE shall be converted to use the true browsers."
Curious about our color? Feel free to ask...
-
smooshable
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:06 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
-
Honours and Awards
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
I guess we can add something if you like but keep in mind vertical doesn't really matter. You have to scroll to read a thread anyway. Is everyone ok with 2k?
Indu and proud of it!!
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
802x601 as max xD or 1030x770 


Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
-
thaltek
- Spamity Spam In A Can
- Posts: 20465
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: chicago's nether region
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
user control panel/board preferances/display settings
toggle the "display images within post"......
also if i remember correctly i believe php has the ability to "resize" a linked image.... i wouldn't swear too it but that might not be a bad alternative....
toggle the "display images within post"......
also if i remember correctly i believe php has the ability to "resize" a linked image.... i wouldn't swear too it but that might not be a bad alternative....
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
Not to mention posting small children.. they're downright virtuosi.

-
thaltek
- Spamity Spam In A Can
- Posts: 20465
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: chicago's nether region
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
Auriel Aryamehr wrote::( I thought I was annoying..
*cries*
thats right pops is more annoying......
anyways...
i will continue to mention this until someone answers me:
~i thought there was a snipit of code out there for php that forces an auto resize.....~
- cyberblade
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 12:58 pm
- Alliance: Pi Allegiance
- Contact:
Re: New Rule Discussion: Image size
thaltek wrote:Auriel Aryamehr wrote::( I thought I was annoying..
*cries*
thats right pops is more annoying......
anyways...
i will continue to mention this until someone answers me:
~i thought there was a snipit of code out there for php that forces an auto resize.....~
check http://www.darrenhoyt.com/2008/04/02/timthumb-php-script-released/
or http://phpthumb.sourceforge.net/
My market feedback:
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 48&t=97386
http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/ ... 48&t=97386

