Do you still enjoy this game?

[Rocky]

i agree with Wolf and Teal'auc maybe we should do something about it though

[Teal'auc of the Void]

i agree with Wolf and Teal'auc maybe we should do something about it though

That's hard... when we say something, we get silenced by those who suck up to those who cause these problems... Individuals have no power to change things... not when too many 'blind followers' and butt suckers are around.



Teal'auc

[Legendary Apophis]

i agree with Wolf and Teal'auc maybe we should do something about it though

That's hard... when we say something, we get silenced by those who suck up to those who cause these problems... Individuals have no power to change things... not when too many 'blind followers' and butt suckers are around.



Teal'auc

People say I'm one of those above when it tends to forums, but for the game, I'm sad it went this way, and as I said I regret "old times" for game. Forums used to be worse sometimes so that's why I'm not complaining how it's ran, because to my opinion, there used to have more "evil" leading.

[Acronon]

As a former Mod I have to say, Gee, thanks mate........

[Phoenix of Terra]

I voted no. I play this game only for TSA these days and that's been going on for about 4 months now. I'm going to have to leave by the time HS starts anyways, so...

As a former Mod I have to say, Gee, thanks mate........

Actually, I agree with Apophis, and I don't think either one of says this because we think the mods got better (mods as a whole always have and probably always will be accused of bias and abuse. Its unfortunate considering the job you guys do ). The community used to be in a place much worse as a whole, just because of hurt/bitter feelings that kind of festered and poisoned the atmosphere. Neither one of us is going to say the forum is a well of happiness and goodwill, but its been worse.

Pops, if I put words in your mouth, feel free to correct me. I apologize in advance if it occurred.

[Nox]

i voted no, since for the last 6-7 months, i havent been able to play the game at work like i used too :'( damn websense

[Legendary Apophis]

I voted no. I play this game only for TSA these days and that's been going on for about 4 months now. I'm going to have to leave by the time HS starts anyways, so...

As a former Mod I have to say, Gee, thanks mate........

Actually, I agree with Apophis, and I don't think either one of says this because we think the mods got better (mods as a whole always have and probably always will be accused of bias and abuse. Its unfortunate considering the job you guys do ). The community used to be in a place much worse as a whole, just because of hurt/bitter feelings that kind of festered and poisoned the atmosphere. Neither one of us is going to say the forum is a well of happiness and goodwill, but its been worse.

Pops, if I put words in your mouth, feel free to correct me. I apologize in advance if it occurred.

No that's it

As a former Mod I have to say, Gee, thanks mate........

lol I didn't mean you in the "bad mods"...but I'm not a witch hunter unlike many people who point out some mods and not the general whole like I do, I can say the mod team as a whole was worse in past, not necessarly the individuals in it...otherwise I'd have named people and if I meant you, you'd be on the list
Here the problem (so called problem in my opinion) is few people, while what I point out in past wasn't individuals, but more global problems. Mods as a whole were seen as bad, while some weren't bad, but at those times it was whole who was seen bad. It was one sided during the early GA times. Now it's multi sided so it's cool . For that reason it was worse, if people wondered why I said it was worse.
Game was better in past, now it's forums according to me who are better.

[Legendary Apophis]

I think my answer still stands to my poll...it's no!

[Teal'auc of the Void]

People say I'm one of those above when it tends to forums, but for the game, I'm sad it went this way, and as I said I regret "old times" for game. Forums used to be worse sometimes so that's why I'm not complaining how it's ran, because to my opinion, there used to have more "evil" leading.

To be frank honest, Jim... yes, you are one of these 'blind followers' on forum. Mainly because Auriel is very close friend of yours, so is Jack... so you back them no matter what. You refuse to see the problems others see with them...

It is admirable you stand up for friends... but in this case it's undesirable...because it hurts the community and shakens trust in whole moderator team.

Yes, there were worse than Jack and Smooshable(won't name anyone), but they are gone - and even then, they were followed by those 'followers' - it took a lot of people to yell, scream and tell others something is not right. A lot of these people were silenced and quit. Now we have similar problem and there are again 'followers' who would back them up, spam topic where they are questioned and issues are raised against them.

It is your choice, Jim, but don't expect everyone to do so, as some people care where this community is going and don't selfishly look at the fact they are friends.



Teal'auc

[Juliette]

To be frank honest, Jim... yes, you are one of these 'blind followers' on forum. Mainly because Auriel is very close friend of yours, so is Jack... so you back them no matter what. You refuse to see the problems others see with them...

Excuse me? Now I kind of have to come to Jim's defence.
You say he is a blind follower. Follower, yes, blind, no. Especially not in regards to Jack. Has he never criticised me for my actions present and past? He has repeatedly done so, often such that we came out the better by it. He was the one who convinced me to lay down modship when I first became mod, after smooshable said I could still finish my trial. Jim has repeatedly said I should stop spamming when I was in a spammy mood, I think we all remember the silly images spam of a week or so ago? Complaints weren't raised, but unofficially, people weren't too happy with that. Jim told me to stop.

So really.. before you go and run your mouth off at him for being 'a blind follower', get your facts straight. Then, when you're convinced he is, by all means, accuse him. Until then, leave him out of your many personal fights. You say he cannot expect everyone to share his opinion? Fine. Same goes for you. Can you handle that?

It is admirable you stand up for friends... but in this case it's undesirable...because it hurts the community and shakens trust in whole moderator team.

Oh, don't be like that.. we've already established Jim is not a staunch supporter of Jack, and I don't believe my name is mentioned very much in this debate except by you. And the few people who think I never should've been made a mod in the first place, of course.. but do they go and 'destabilise' this community further? Oh, maybe they do.. but that wouldn't be something I, or Jim for that matter, would know about now, would it.

Yes, there were worse than Jack and Smooshable(won't name anyone), but they are gone - and even then, they were followed by those 'followers' - it took a lot of people to yell, scream and tell others something is not right. A lot of these people were silenced and quit. Now we have similar problem and there are again 'followers' who would back them up, spam topic where they are questioned and issues are raised against them.

Glad you mention there were worse people. I'm not going to name any names either, but from what I know of the Administrative history of these forums, there are but a few who would qualify.
However, opposition against the Administration has been a part of these forums ever since they were founded - from the first claims: Why is the owner of this game forum admin?! to the claims about Psi, to the claims about Shaitan, to the claims about Pookie, to this latest fashion of bashing smooshable - there have been continuous oppositions. Whether it was paying people who were angry at Forum, people who were fooled by Psi's gender stunts, victims of Omega, (can't think of anyone with Pooka) to you and Freespirit and every single rebel in this latest fling.

It is your choice, Jim, but don't expect everyone to do so, as some people care where this community is going and don't selfishly look at the fact they are friends.

Jim, or anyone, does not expect anyone to do anything, except for those who have brains to use their common sense. What else can you expect from people? It's the main reason no one is actually going to say you are wrong in your fight against smooshable or Jack. Perhaps you are - I'm not saying you're not.. - but even the most dumb person knows that no one is going to accept something as the truth just because they have had some bad experiences and a loud voice.

Seems to become a trend to be convinced of your own truth and to expect everyone to follow that belief without question.. the lack of logic in that is stunning.

Things went wrong in the past with previous Administrators, people whined. Things go wrong now, people whine.
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us."

Ah well.. I'll wait for you to play the "bad past! don't listen!"-card again, or maybe you've found a new argument in the past year? Sure would be nice.
Otherwise, I'd appreciate it if you took the above seriously.

[dastupy]

To be frank honest, Jim... yes, you are one of these 'blind followers' on forum. Mainly because Auriel is very close friend of yours, so is Jack... so you back them no matter what. You refuse to see the problems others see with them...

Excuse me? Now I kind of have to come to Jim's defence.
You say he is a blind follower. Follower, yes, blind, no. Especially not in regards to Jack. Has he never criticised me for my actions present and past? He has repeatedly done so, often such that we came out the better by it. He was the one who convinced me to lay down modship when I first became mod, after smooshable said I could still finish my trial. Jim has repeatedly said I should stop spamming when I was in a spammy mood, I think we all remember the silly images spam of a week or so ago? Complaints weren't raised, but unofficially, people weren't too happy with that. Jim told me to stop.

So really.. before you go and run your mouth off at him for being 'a blind follower', get your facts straight. Then, when you're convinced he is, by all means, accuse him. Until then, leave him out of your many personal fights. You say he cannot expect everyone to share his opinion? Fine. Same goes for you. Can you handle that?

It is admirable you stand up for friends... but in this case it's undesirable...because it hurts the community and shakens trust in whole moderator team.

Oh, don't be like that.. we've already established Jim is not a staunch supporter of Jack, and I don't believe my name is mentioned very much in this debate except by you. And the few people who think I never should've been made a mod in the first place, of course.. but do they go and 'destabilise' this community further? Oh, maybe they do.. but that wouldn't be something I, or Jim for that matter, would know about now, would it.

Yes, there were worse than Jack and Smooshable(won't name anyone), but they are gone - and even then, they were followed by those 'followers' - it took a lot of people to yell, scream and tell others something is not right. A lot of these people were silenced and quit. Now we have similar problem and there are again 'followers' who would back them up, spam topic where they are questioned and issues are raised against them.

Glad you mention there were worse people. I'm not going to name any names either, but from what I know of the Administrative history of these forums, there are but a few who would qualify.
However, opposition against the Administration has been a part of these forums ever since they were founded - from the first claims: Why is the owner of this game forum admin?! to the claims about Psi, to the claims about Shaitan, to the claims about Pookie, to this latest fashion of bashing smooshable - there have been continuous oppositions. Whether it was paying people who were angry at Forum, people who were fooled by Psi's gender stunts, victims of Omega, (can't think of anyone with Pooka) to you and Freespirit and every single rebel in this latest fling.

It is your choice, Jim, but don't expect everyone to do so, as some people care where this community is going and don't selfishly look at the fact they are friends.

Jim, or anyone, does not expect anyone to do anything, except for those who have brains to use their common sense. What else can you expect from people? It's the main reason no one is actually going to say you are wrong in your fight against smooshable or Jack. Perhaps you are - I'm not saying you're not.. - but even the most dumb person knows that no one is going to accept something as the truth just because they have had some bad experiences and a loud voice.

Seems to become a trend to be convinced of your own truth and to expect everyone to follow that belief without question.. the lack of logic in that is stunning.

Things went wrong in the past with previous Administrators, people whined. Things go wrong now, people whine.
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us."

Ah well.. I'll wait for you to play the "bad past! don't listen!"-card again, or maybe you've found a new argument in the past year? Sure would be nice.
Otherwise, I'd appreciate it if you took the above seriously.

Epic fail , sorry Auriel
On the spam thing : I did a lot of remarks...

[Melisandre]

Epic fail , sorry Auriel

Used to that by now..

On the spam thing : I did a lot of remarks...

True.. but did you make that an official complaint? If yes, I wasn't informed..
Or maybe I missed it.

*fails again*
Rats..

[Legendary Apophis]

No epic fail at all, you don't know what happens out of this forum about it, so you are not one to say if what she says is fake, since you dont know those facts, as they are out of forum and your ears and eyes.
Good try on discredit, but sadly you've failed!
So I'm all ready to hear things since you know what is said on private between me and her, between her and jack, and so on...or pretended to in your post.
Good try as I said to say private things you don't know about are fail, but well, you know nothing 'bout them, so why trying heh?

[pianomutt20000]

People say I'm one of those above when it tends to forums, but for the game, I'm sad it went this way, and as I said I regret "old times" for game. Forums used to be worse sometimes so that's why I'm not complaining how it's ran, because to my opinion, there used to have more "evil" leading.

To be frank honest, Jim... yes, you are one of these 'blind followers' on forum. Mainly because Auriel is very close friend of yours, so is Jack... so you back them no matter what. You refuse to see the problems others see with them...

It is admirable you stand up for friends... but in this case it's undesirable...because it hurts the community and shakens trust in whole moderator team.

Yes, there were worse than Jack and Smooshable(won't name anyone), but they are gone - and even then, they were followed by those 'followers' - it took a lot of people to yell, scream and tell others something is not right. A lot of these people were silenced and quit. Now we have similar problem and there are again 'followers' who would back them up, spam topic where they are questioned and issues are raised against them.

It is your choice, Jim, but don't expect everyone to do so, as some people care where this community is going and don't selfishly look at the fact they are friends.



Teal'auc

Bah, that's bull. Jim has his own style, but he's not a blind follower.


Never has been, never will be.


OF course, after this, you will most likely label me a "blind follower"..Regardless of my efforts to get both freespirit and guardian unbanned.


The problem is this. If you don't agree with Teal'auc, then you must be a blind follower.


I try to stay out of this myself, but couldn't' sit by while Jim was attacked.



Bill

[Iƒrit]

from reading experience Id have to say that both Auriel and Apophis are brown nosers.