Time Limit on Re-Ascending

Suggest any improvements
stefanos
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:42 am
ID: 0
Location: in the kallium galaxy

Forum wrote:REPOST since a lot apparantly did not see it (and edited to the basics..to see original look on page 2 of this thread):

have people convinced me it should be a bit harder each time to reascend? yes.

what is the method:
same Glory and Rep needed;
higher UP needed.
***increased UT/trained/Naq ratio with each reascension***

is that on top of the higher up or because of it
chunkysoup
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:49 pm
ID: 0
Location: earth

drastic suggestion but i think it needs to be considered - do away with troop transfers just like in quantum
chunkysoup
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:49 pm
ID: 0
Location: earth

or hey, while we're beating this topic to death, here's another idea - the sooner you want to reascend, the more it costs - ie, if you try to reascend in 3 weeks, you need 3k up and 150k troops left behind, 4 weeks is 2.5k up and 125k troops, etc
User avatar
fremen
Forum Irregular
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:14 pm

Forum wrote:i believe it was the huge accounts in the first place that caused some imbalance. and that imbalance could nto be stopped in one ascension....for reasons mentioned above (and no real way to stop transfer/transfer back).

can/should a large main account remain as large after reascension? no...
Does the 1000UP / 25k UT / 10k Trained / 250Mil Naq minimums (at 1000UP) help? I believe, yes, they do, as honestly - how many times can people expend that and still have ability to climb in 2weeks to top 100??

have people convinced me it should be a bit harder each time to reascend? yes.

what is the method: same Glory and Rep needed; higher UP needed.
increased UT/trained/Naq ratio with each reascension....

I believe this will keep it so that one cannot reascend 5x with 'one account worth' of goods....

now get ready for the onslaught of counter-opinions :) ....... ;)


I would like to suggest increasing the UP requirement to reascend to 2000, then three thousand for the third go around, then four thousand for the fourth attempt. The investment and troop requirement based on UP would slow down the ability of people to ascend four times in three months. How many incarnates do we need?
Pirates wander the verse and the loot lays thickly upon the common man.

Hallowed ARRRRRR the Orrrrrri!

Ascended Player of the Year 2008 Annual Awards - Thanks everyone for the votes.
XIZOR
Forum Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:04 pm
ID: 0
Location: New Jersey

fremen wrote:
Forum wrote:i believe it was the huge accounts in the first place that caused some imbalance. and that imbalance could nto be stopped in one ascension....for reasons mentioned above (and no real way to stop transfer/transfer back).

can/should a large main account remain as large after reascension? no...
Does the 1000UP / 25k UT / 10k Trained / 250Mil Naq minimums (at 1000UP) help? I believe, yes, they do, as honestly - how many times can people expend that and still have ability to climb in 2weeks to top 100??

have people convinced me it should be a bit harder each time to reascend? yes.

what is the method: same Glory and Rep needed; higher UP needed.
increased UT/trained/Naq ratio with each reascension....

I believe this will keep it so that one cannot reascend 5x with 'one account worth' of goods....

now get ready for the onslaught of counter-opinions :) ....... ;)


I would like to suggest increasing the UP requirement to reascend to 2000, then three thousand for the third go around, then four thousand for the fourth attempt. The investment and troop requirement based on UP would slow down the ability of people to ascend four times in three months. How many incarnates do we need?


here here
Image
Elemental_FIRE
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 6:40 pm

I think that there is someone who is working on their fourth ascension right now.
agapooka
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Posts: 2607
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am
ID: 0

Honours and Awards

Umm... and there are soem people that ahve already ascended 5 times, at least one. JUAN.
Agapooka wrote:The argument that because a premise cannot be proven false, it must be true, is known as a Negative Proof Fallacy in logic.
Mister Sandman wrote:Nothing at all near the negative proof fallacy in logic. If it cannot be proven false, it has to be true.
Pooka's UU Market Loyalty Card:

Rudy Pena: 1 stamp!

A Spider: 1 stamp!
Weiland
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:15 pm

Lol

Say One Juan out loud.

now say tu-tu.

Sorry, bad humour sense of...
McKay - "Well, thats that! Your mines make one hell of a bang, Colonel. I'm sure the Wraith's ears are ringing."
Image
Patron God of The Asgard Collective
Locked

Return to “Suggestions”