when come some update fair for all player
always when someone have strong MS can mass other with 1 turn
always when have much stronger attack dont lost sodiers..
always bigger is better and new player are .... for admins
this game come look death ...
fair play
- sandokan555
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:14 am
- Alliance: «SK» Emperors™
- Race: half human
- ID: 34221
fair play
ID:34221
-
Juliette Verified
- The Queen
- Posts: 31802
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:57 pm
- Race: Royalty
- ID: 4323
- Alternate name(s): Cersei Lannister
- Location: Ultima Thule
Re: fair play
Sandokan, did you mean to say:
All updates are unfair for new players.
Give us an update that is fair for them too.
This game is dead.
Must be Talk-like-a-Pirate Day again?
All updates are unfair for new players.
Give us an update that is fair for them too.
This game is dead.
Must be Talk-like-a-Pirate Day again?
WikiPedia wrote:Sandokan is a famous fictional pirate of the late nineteenth century

- sandokan555
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:14 am
- Alliance: «SK» Emperors™
- Race: half human
- ID: 34221
Re: fair play
ok thx for translation ..
seggestion is ...
bigger is always better and newbie are always discriminate.
if someone will i see way on auto destruction weaponts and auto desert units.
when you have more units(AS) then more will desert from theyr posts...
you have weapont .. time do own work on funcional weaponts ... some scrap self...
if you have 0-1 mil AS. noone fleet away theyr post
1-5 mil. AS only some miners can desert.
5-10 mil. miners + covert and anticovert agent can desert.
10-50 mil. miners+agents + mercenaries can desert
50-100 mil (all before) + normal soldiers can desert
100 mil + all units can desert
(AS is of course about discusion)
bigger army is more problems now ...
and weaponts ... every turn can go down 0,5 % thats 100% on 200 turn and thats 4 days. when you not repair then after 4 days .. you lost all weaponts ...
seggestion is ...
bigger is always better and newbie are always discriminate.
if someone will i see way on auto destruction weaponts and auto desert units.
when you have more units(AS) then more will desert from theyr posts...
you have weapont .. time do own work on funcional weaponts ... some scrap self...
if you have 0-1 mil AS. noone fleet away theyr post
1-5 mil. AS only some miners can desert.
5-10 mil. miners + covert and anticovert agent can desert.
10-50 mil. miners+agents + mercenaries can desert
50-100 mil (all before) + normal soldiers can desert
100 mil + all units can desert
(AS is of course about discusion)
bigger army is more problems now ...
and weaponts ... every turn can go down 0,5 % thats 100% on 200 turn and thats 4 days. when you not repair then after 4 days .. you lost all weaponts ...
ID:34221
-
grimgor
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:30 am
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 28599
Re: fair play
about the weapons
1 that would be massive server lag
2 you go to bed and wake up with your defence only beening 90% and if your hit even less so it will be easier to farm the small players
I dont understand the other one
1 that would be massive server lag
2 you go to bed and wake up with your defence only beening 90% and if your hit even less so it will be easier to farm the small players
I dont understand the other one
-
Tacet
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 12:00 pm
- Alliance: T I T A N S
- ID: 84055
Re: fair play
Me don't like. Me don't really understand either. Me thinks this is going to hurt small players even more than the rest, as an AS of 10 mil is still pretty much small, and even they are then facing the Plague! And small players can less afford continued repairing of their weps.
-
Lore
- Fountain of Wisdom
- Posts: 10730
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:30 am
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium Empire
- Race: System Lord / AJNA
- ID: 1928117
- Location: On the dark side of the moon
-
Honours and Awards
Re: fair play
His native toungue is not english, and he's come along way since he started playing, please give him some courtousy.
What hes basicly suggesting is for the militaries to have a "cost" or an "ongoing upkeep". Its a valid idea and has been discussed before.
I agree with many of his points. The 1 AT MS battles are just not right. Admin attempted to address it but then just re nigged on it and set it back.
0 Strike losses with massive defensive losses are not exactly right either, but thats the way the game is designed.
As for "Fair" updates San I have to say the last several updates have been unfair to larger players over smaller ones, especially in ascended.
What hes basicly suggesting is for the militaries to have a "cost" or an "ongoing upkeep". Its a valid idea and has been discussed before.
I agree with many of his points. The 1 AT MS battles are just not right. Admin attempted to address it but then just re nigged on it and set it back.
0 Strike losses with massive defensive losses are not exactly right either, but thats the way the game is designed.
As for "Fair" updates San I have to say the last several updates have been unfair to larger players over smaller ones, especially in ascended.

schuesseled wrote:And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.
- Shadowarrior
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:33 pm
Re: fair play
big army usually win in wars thats jsut reality folks deal with it...
Mc. Random says:
If I had to compare you with anyone in history shadow, It would be general patton.
If I had to compare you with anyone in history shadow, It would be general patton.
-
Tacet
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 12:00 pm
- Alliance: T I T A N S
- ID: 84055
Re: fair play
Lore wrote:His native toungue is not english, and he's come along way since he started playing, please give him some courtousy.
The tone of the first message coupled with the name really made me think that Lois was right, and that he tried to create a dramatic, pirate like tone to the thread. I for one liked it and tried to keep somewhat in tone with it. I apologize if any offence was given. None was meant.
I can live with desertion as in the units untrain themselves. Weps that needs maintenance cost will also be fine. But if he meant that the units desert as in totally go away - then I'd be totally against it. It will end up hurting everyone, making life harder for the large players, but even harder for the little guy.
-
12agnar0k
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:08 pm
- ID: 0
Re: fair play
Lore wrote:As for "Fair" updates San I have to say the last several updates have been unfair to larger players over smaller ones, especially in ascended.
Yup you have the ability to wreck us in ascended and we can continue to MS 1 turn you, all is fair, all is good.
- Wolf359
- The Big Bad Admin
- Posts: 5208
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
- Alliance: EPA
- Race: Tauri
- ID: 0
- Location: Omnipresent
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: fair play
Shadowarrior wrote:big army usually win in wars thats jsut reality folks deal with it...
You're quite right - but whoever said this game works like that!?
It's not actually that simple.
Mod SpeakSeverian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
-
12agnar0k
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:08 pm
- ID: 0
Re: fair play
Actually smaller armies have the advantage... so long as their is big armies on both sides taking down defences, as you have 0 income, you can just pick away at the big incomes like a vulture, dont want to loose your MS? dont build it.
