The Only Fuall vs Taskforce Thread Of Disscussion

[Brdavs]

Is it working though?

Is *our* way working?

[Juliette]

Is it working though?

Is *our* way working?

I'm looking at you like that woman in the background.

First confused: "How can it be?! Brdavs has something to say!"
Second suspicious: "How can it be?! Where's he going with this.."
Third exasperation: "How can it be?! I thought he wanted to say something."

(Luv'ya, just messing.)

[thaltek]

Is it working though?

Is *our* way working?

ah, yes... informing your foe that they will fail always works as a main strategy......

[REK]

well there used to failing

[The Doctor]

Could a mod please delete this post?

[Tekki]

Haz, I don't know what you are complaining about. TLE had a policy of not allowing people to surrender because of 'attitude'. And of not accepting surrenders even when individuals wanted to 'get on with the game'.

You reep what you sow, and I guess you are now the first one to find out that what TLE sowed, isn't that good in return.

[The Doctor]

Could a mod please delete this post?

[~Massin4Christ~]

WTH? What attitude?

All I said was my belief!!! That isnt attitude!

And even if TJP/TTF did that... FUALL doing it back is kinda hypocritical don't you think?

Any member of TJP or Allies of same can approach either me on behalf of Omega Empire or Deni of DDE.

Our general inclination will be to accept, but we reserve the right to refuse in certain circumstances. Our terms will be simple, they are…

1) Official surrender on forums
2) Leaving of all TJP officers/commanders
3) No hits on us for the duration of the war
4) 1 naq tribute
5) You agree to give no assets or resources to any player we are in conflict with for the duration of this conflict.
6) You agree not to return to any TJP member team or ally after this conflict.

We will add to or modify these terms if we see violations / abuse .


Again, our general inclination will be to accept …As always, we will be fair and treat people respectfully. If our adversaries choose a different approach, well that says something about both sides.

[The Doctor]

Could a mod please delete this post?

[Noobert]

Enough.
Take it here.
viewtopic.php?f=101&t=124143

Thank you and have a nice day.

[Tekki]

From the 'Surrender to FUALL thread' viewtopic.php?f=68&t=124484 Since that's not meant to be a discussion thread ....

WTH? What attitude?

All I said was my belief!!! That isnt attitude!

And even if TJP/TTF did that... FUALL doing it back is kinda hypocritical don't you think?

Any member of TJP or Allies of same can approach either me on behalf of Omega Empire or Deni of DDE.

Our general inclination will be to accept, but we reserve the right to refuse in certain circumstances. Our terms will be simple, they are…

1) Official surrender on forums
2) Leaving of all TJP officers/commanders
3) No hits on us for the duration of the war
4) 1 naq tribute
5) You agree to give no assets or resources to any player we are in conflict with for the duration of this conflict.
6) You agree not to return to any TJP member team or ally after this conflict.

We will add to or modify these terms if we see violations / abuse .


Again, our general inclination will be to accept …As always, we will be fair and treat people respectfully. If our adversaries choose a different approach, well that says something about both sides.

I haven't violated or abused the terms... I'm trying to surrender so I can actually follow them.

Hypocritical? LOL! You can't be serious. FUALL are not being hypocritical and are IMO actually being quite reasonable. What was hypocritical is the fact that various parts of TLE had fought in wars before and BEEN ALLOWED to surrender, then suddenly they back NOT allowing others to surrender. So no, it's hardly hypocritical, it's merely returning your own attitude to you. Or were you not paying attention to the decisions your leaders were making on your behalf?

As for the attitude/belief thing... well your belief has a certain arrogant attitude to it... hence I can understand my boss' attitude and decision with regards to you.

So putting them down for doing things FUALL is doing isnt hypocritical? Returning MY OWN ATTITUDE? Linking one members actions with the rest don't you think? And as for not allowing others to surrender...I suggest you go talk to Angelos...who was just allowed to leave the war by TJP/TTF.

Arrogance? I'm sorry if that looks like arrogance to you. It is much the same as Tetrismonkeys "Go give em hell".

I'm off to work now... hope something good arises from this instead of the obvious mud-slinging match which seems impending.

My my my, I guess you really DIDN'T pay attention did you? TLE said NUMEROUS times that AEU was 'punished' and not allowed to surrender because of MY attitude. So attaching the attitude of ONE to the whole is standard practice for you lot.

I guess you don't like it though.

However, that's not really what's happening here. Your attitude offended GunZ, who on behalf of OE does not accept your surrender. It's that simple. Perhaps you should practice being contrite and submissive so that you can get on with the game as you claim you want to.

You keep saying 'Tetrismonkey did the same'... well perhaps Tetrismonkey was an oversight, or was at a time when the various people were feeling more merciful. You can bark that it's merely belief, however, perhaps it's a belief that you should lose if you really do want to surrender something, I guess we are all doubting your veracity here.

PS, I never said this war, but that's something that isn't directly relevant here, but merely an interesting illustration about the how individuals will go along with things when it doesn't affect them but as soon as they get actions similar to those they - whether personally or allowing their alliance that action - inflicted upon others, they suddenly scream injustice or hypocracy.

[deni]

posts split fro the FUALL surrender thread and merged into the general discussion thread

[Tekki]

Thank you Deni

[The Doctor]

Could a mod please delete this post?

[Borek]

You keep missing PPT's and are a great farm, so having a big mouth whilst trying to leave is not going to convince anyone to let you do just that. As for tetrismonkey then he got massed for leaving then blabbing his collosal sized mouth. so take a moment to think why we are not so willing to let you leave when you are doing exactly what he got massed for. it's a waste of time, if we let you go, you will just blab like a putz and we'll have to come mass you again, so we may aswell just keep you in the war and farm your naq, saves all of us time and effort.