Empires Poll.

[Giovanni]

Would YOU like to see an End to all the current Empire's ?


Vote. or die : P

[Lore]

It doesn't really matter, even if the current Empires dissolved I would say less then 48 hrs later you will see new ones take their place. Honestly, only the names will change, nothing else.

I can't say yes, and I can't say no either.

[Mordack]

Yes and no.

No because I like my empire. I like the people in it, I like the way it's organized and I quite genuinely like the way we roll. FUALL for the win, yo.

And yes because I realize that Empires are bad for this game. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that they're very, very bad for the game, and that in order for it to progress and thrive again all of these coalitions are going to have to be ended somehow. But unless a few more people from either side start to think like me, though, I don't think we can look forward to it anytime soon.

[Duderanch]

yeh that would be nice, although the bonds are already there so even if they 'officially' disolve they will still be there and help eachother in game.

[RepliMagni]

Omega and DDE have been bedmates for as long as most players can remember, and whilst they are, there will always be people who unite to fight against them, whether they be the Liberium Coalition, TJP, or TTF.

Would I like to see an end to Empires? Yes. But where do you draw the line? A main alliance and a training alliance? A few "sister" alliances? Inter-alliance military pacts? Then whats to stop everyone joining one big alliance?

Its just not practical. The only real hope for the game is that more powerful accounts rise outside of the traditional DDE/OE/TA/TL/TO alliances and form their own coalitions. If there are, say five empires of equivalent strength, the game would be less polarised between the two camps that it currently is....

[Noobert]

Empires will remain no matter what because people are allies. That will always form a empire when they go to war with their allies, does it not?

[Giovanni]

Well, in imo why have 2 sides - Fuall and TTF or why have then at all, who wants to be in these endless in power competition.

Maybe a year ago it was wise to have 200+ players in an empire sinds it kinda proofed the win in the last WW.

But now as ive read over and over, it doesnt take a whole lot to mass anymore, what's the point of having 300 members ?

What's the point of have 2 sides when there can be 10 ?

[Noobert]

Well, in imo why have 2 sides - Fuall and TTF or why have then at all, who wants to be in these endless in power competition.

Maybe a year ago it was wise to have 200+ players in an empire sinds it kinda proofed the win in the last WW.

But now as ive read over and over, it doesnt take a whole lot to mass anymore, what's the point of having 300 members ?

What's the point of have 2 sides when there can be 10 ?

That would just mean more NAPs, and more players to watch out who you hit. More egos flaring, more people arguing to go to war. Endless war is boring.

[Giovanni]

Empires will remain no matter what because people are allies. That will always form a empire when they go to war with their allies, does it not?

You have 200 sgw friends who are desperately to make an empire with you?

So it's necessary to involve intire FUall when Mayhem start a war?

Are you guys really that pathetic ?

[Giovanni]

Well, in imo why have 2 sides - Fuall and TTF or why have then at all, who wants to be in these endless in power competition.

Maybe a year ago it was wise to have 200+ players in an empire sinds it kinda proofed the win in the last WW.

But now as ive read over and over, it doesnt take a whole lot to mass anymore, what's the point of having 300 members ?

What's the point of have 2 sides when there can be 10 ?

That would just mean more NAPs, and more players to watch out who you hit. More egos flaring, more people arguing to go to war. Endless war is boring.

Why?

There's no need for naps, take an example of Corkscrew, the 1 moment you where chatting with him like an mate, the next he rapes your account. lol

[Noobert]

Why?

There's no need for naps, take an example of Corkscrew, the 1 moment you where chatting with him like an mate, the next he rapes your account. lol

I don't know why. Some people have good relations, some people like having their friends closer, there is a various reasons that could be explained as to why people want NAPs, but not to many.

[bebita]

the dumbest ever poll..............
i saw games with 10 alliances and one empire
the only way to destroy empires is to destroy alliances in game

[Giovanni]

the dumbest ever poll..............
i saw games with 10 alliances and one empire
the only way to destroy empires is to destroy alliances in game

Is it?

You know bebita, not everybody needs protection like you do.

You would have been annihilated a long time ago if it wasn't for you joining DDE.
And such players like yourself ruin this game.


Grow a pair, leave DDE stop ass kissing you mates then try to be the almighty one.

[Boooby]

Friends....Bonds....I cant destroy ur pixels because ur my friend.....


Empires are just safe heavens.

If you make money off this game (not criticizing anyone) and u are given a choice whether to join a regular alliance or a Empire which has 200+ members and has NAPs on half the server and most of the powerful alliances, which way would u go?

if your goal is to just have fun while playing a game, why have pacts and be allies with most of the top 10 alliances? Oh I know, its like cheating, its like a shortcut, a way that is easier to build ur account.

I play games with my friends....and we try destroy each other because its a.....uhmmm...oh right...a game. People take this game so seriously.

If one Empire is created, eventually another Empire will rise up just to keep it balanced and **Filtered**. So if players resist the tendency to expand the alliance beyond being an alliance, maybe....just maybe this game would be better off.


We should scrap NAPs and Military pacts along with Empires.

Being friends is just being used as an excuse to dominate the game is all im saying.

[bebita]

the dumbest ever poll..............
i saw games with 10 alliances and one empire
the only way to destroy empires is to destroy alliances in game

Is it?

You know bebita, not everybody needs protection like you do.

You would have been annihilated a long time ago if it wasn't for you joining DDE.
And such players like yourself ruin this game.


Grow a pair, leave DDE stop ass kissing you mates then try to be the almighty one.

who are u?
ahh a guy defeceless and a sniper
probably get sick of this sittuation and now he yells
anihilation
what you are talking about?
looking in mirror?