Players investing only in attack, the solution against them.

[smooshable]

If its ok for Asgards to invest ONLY on defence, then its ok for Tauri to invest only on Attack.

So many times I have reconned Asgards and found they have +2bil defence, and 0 attack.

So why the double standards? Atleast you know they are PLAYING the game, not just sitting back and watching.

Sorry I'm a bit late with this but that looks, smells and tastes suspiciously like a strawman.

[Sniping_Viper_1]

this whole topic is about taking away race advantages. why don't we all just play as tauir with no advantages wouldn't that be fun.
Using the method of having only attack or only defence is a method just like having only covert. each have their advantages each have their disadvantages. If your going to gripe about the differences in race. PLAY A DIFFERENT GAME.

[cinder__393]

lol good call ...lets !!! (joken not being serious in lets)
lets sit here an play such a game where there is no chalenge (tho i think more races with different variaty of bonuses would be good) say a wraith with regeneration bonus (that the goualds have as a special and an attack bonus) (lets go for more game diversity)
(what was this topic about again)

[Sniping_Viper_1]

this whole topic is about taking away race advantages. why don't we all just play as tauir with no advantages wouldn't that be fun. .

u all realize i was being sarcastic. and wow my spelling through that whole post is HORRIBLE

[cinder__393]

as was i

MORE GAME DIVERSITY IS WHAT WE NEED NOT LESS ABILITYS
lol sorry i wasnt clear-er

[Dj Ibiza]

OK, You all give your opinion and as the starter of this discussion i think i finally agree with u. Each race has it advantage and the strategy which go with. ok>>>>

Consider this topic close.