Mothership Massing
- deni
- The Initiate
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:18 am
- Alliance: THE DARK DOMINIUM
- Race: Goddess
- ID: 75493
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Mothership Massing
It is a pretty nice discussion here, but as long as no one brings this to Jason's attention on the irc meets, it stays just a discussion.

If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you're up to
- bebita
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 5852
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:40 am
- Alliance: Familly
- Race: brothers
- ID: 0
Re: Mothership Massing
deni wrote:It is a pretty nice discussion here, but as long as no one brings this to Jason's attention on the irc meets, it stays just a discussion.
link was passed
he run fast at the last meeting when i manage to log in on chat
dunno if he read
Spoiler
Tziki wrote:
Bebita a known Spy from the server war, who joined TO under false pretences yet again has a filthy trick up his sleave. In fact it appears the Filth up his sleave is DDE and Mayhem. When confronted about them supporting Bebita and Rob3rt (as there were suspicions as to be a tiny account got his MS and Naq / Turns etc) neither deny their involved behind the scenes but instead hint towards it being a coincidence.
R8 wrote:the shock of seeing bebita in my attack logs after so long was too much to handle so I had to hit vac mode to try and recover for a few days
catch ya later
-
urogard
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:05 am
- ID: 0
- Location: Slovensko
Re: Mothership Massing
Jedi~Tank wrote:urogard wrote:you're doing is in such a horribly complicated way
the fix is horribly easy as i already posted a while ago
No..he makes sense, and IT makes sense..a small one is going to mass out a big one because it is unmanned..in a live battle the bigger will have an advantage obviously because it is big..but pilot skill will come into play in a 1 on 1..now if you have 2 good players, then the player with the bigger ms or bigger naq stash will win out.
i'm not saying he doesn't make sense, but considering his method and my method, his is way much more complicated both to code and to execute.
- Noobert
- Sedin Triplet
- Posts: 12750
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:39 pm
- Alliance: Mayhem
- Race: A Canuck
- ID: 57572
- Location: Canada, British Columbia
- Noobert
- Sedin Triplet
- Posts: 12750
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:39 pm
- Alliance: Mayhem
- Race: A Canuck
- ID: 57572
- Location: Canada, British Columbia
- hellkaiser
- Fledgling Forumer
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:38 am
- Alliance: ~Horus Guard~
- Race: goa,uld
- ID: 0
Re: Mothership Massing
well i'm trying hard to follow this and usually i'm good with ideas but i'm a LITTLE outta my league given there is some people here who are amazingly good at working these things out
but i guess i'll get that in time as all do
the problem is that a small ms can do more damage and this is illogical and the only explanations were that the ms battles weren't TRUE ms battles (this is definitely the case ofc) and that bigger mean's easier to hit
perhap's easier way's of offsetting the costs would be that weapon's MUST have shields and you can't go over a small percentage of that meaning that they MUST have destroyable assets and that they risk their shield's on attacking a larger ms thus increasing the cost and forcing players to not result to silly no shielded massing ms's
the other thing would be instead of or even better ALONG WITH a ms effeciency level instead how about extra options like mothership reverse engineering thus miniaturising the ms's at a loss of a small percent of capacity *roughly same or slightly less as mothership efficiency level meaning if you get a mothership effeciency level 1 and a mothership miniaturisation/reverse enginerring level 1 then you will lose all/some of the extra boost but will lose a % less shields/weapons on attack's with and on it
also another idea would be that if mothership's have no shields then they would take hull damage and therefore be limited to the amounts of unshielded attack's they could survive meaning that they would of course be temporarily unavailable for use for a limited period of time
this could be roughly the cost of a new ms times a percentage of the cost of all capacity's on it but just another thought
the other would be another option (again i know i'm being over complicated but these are just initial ideas and could be going in the wrong direction here) which would increase the reapair ability on the mothership thus reducing it's costs and/or time that it will be out of commision after it has been damaged enough after shields
basically what i'm going for is fully customisable yet balanced mothership's which aren't exploitable
however i could also be just helping the entire dreadnaught problem as big players who pump money into their ms which is a massable asset aren't being too smart imho as it break's the game by giving the strong just a bigger extra hammer to smash with while the weak are left to chip away slowly
i really would like to see something though along the lines of careful upgrading of a ms and in a balanced way
something along the lines of extra options like
mothership enhanced targeting computers (increasing damage to weapons a ms can inflict)
mothership semi matter phasic projectile upgrades *the name is just a top of the head thing* (allows motherships weapons to better destroy shields)
but yeah i'm just new so these are prob way to hard to code and would take too much time as well
but i guess i'll get that in time as all do
the problem is that a small ms can do more damage and this is illogical and the only explanations were that the ms battles weren't TRUE ms battles (this is definitely the case ofc) and that bigger mean's easier to hit
perhap's easier way's of offsetting the costs would be that weapon's MUST have shields and you can't go over a small percentage of that meaning that they MUST have destroyable assets and that they risk their shield's on attacking a larger ms thus increasing the cost and forcing players to not result to silly no shielded massing ms's
the other thing would be instead of or even better ALONG WITH a ms effeciency level instead how about extra options like mothership reverse engineering thus miniaturising the ms's at a loss of a small percent of capacity *roughly same or slightly less as mothership efficiency level meaning if you get a mothership effeciency level 1 and a mothership miniaturisation/reverse enginerring level 1 then you will lose all/some of the extra boost but will lose a % less shields/weapons on attack's with and on it
also another idea would be that if mothership's have no shields then they would take hull damage and therefore be limited to the amounts of unshielded attack's they could survive meaning that they would of course be temporarily unavailable for use for a limited period of time
this could be roughly the cost of a new ms times a percentage of the cost of all capacity's on it but just another thought
the other would be another option (again i know i'm being over complicated but these are just initial ideas and could be going in the wrong direction here) which would increase the reapair ability on the mothership thus reducing it's costs and/or time that it will be out of commision after it has been damaged enough after shields
basically what i'm going for is fully customisable yet balanced mothership's which aren't exploitable
however i could also be just helping the entire dreadnaught problem as big players who pump money into their ms which is a massable asset aren't being too smart imho as it break's the game by giving the strong just a bigger extra hammer to smash with while the weak are left to chip away slowly
i really would like to see something though along the lines of careful upgrading of a ms and in a balanced way
something along the lines of extra options like
mothership enhanced targeting computers (increasing damage to weapons a ms can inflict)
mothership semi matter phasic projectile upgrades *the name is just a top of the head thing* (allows motherships weapons to better destroy shields)
but yeah i'm just new so these are prob way to hard to code and would take too much time as well
=OOC
= in character

= in character
THE ONLY ONE TO HAVE CHARMED BUCKbuck wrote:If hellkaiser keeps this up hes going to make me blush
-
dazman
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:59 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Canada
Re: Mothership Massing
yea the Ms massing is kinda lame lol.
Trade feedback thread~disturbed_one wrote:its a war game so if by us massing random peeps ruins the game for them then maybe they should go play with barbi dolls
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 48&t=70898
- Noobert
- Sedin Triplet
- Posts: 12750
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:39 pm
- Alliance: Mayhem
- Race: A Canuck
- ID: 57572
- Location: Canada, British Columbia
- Iƒrit
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3507
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:15 am
- Alliance: The Legion
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 22479
- Alternate name(s): Hansel, Nighthawk
- Location: Maine
Re: Mothership Massing
Regardless of size if a MS takes damage that blows through shields it should not be able to return fire since the crew would be more concerned about the hull integrity then the acual combat its in envolved in, basically a shieldless MS should not be allowed to engage combat, I like the idea of a MS having to contain a percentage of weapons in shields, after all a ship with no shields cant seriously win a MS battle, it would be disabled in one shot and therefor useless, please change this combat system its uber retarded.
-
Tekki
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:37 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Mothership Massing
hellkaiser wrote: however i could also be just helping the entire dreadnaught problem as big players who pump money into their ms which is a massable asset aren't being too smart imho as it break's the game by giving the strong just a bigger extra hammer to smash with while the weak are left to chip away slowly
I can appreciate the point here, I don't like it but I can appreciate it. But at lot of the MSs have been built for purpose, and their purpose is, I admit fully, smashing other MSs. And they've been built because MSs help hugely farming.
Take a 200b strike, add say 5, 50b attack planets, that's then a 450b strike and then add a 300b strike MS to it, and viola, 750b strike for 200b strike men. With this being the case, who wouldn't build their MS?
As far as I can tell no one is objecting to a smaller MS massing a bigger MS (I know I'm not) just that the losses should reflect relative strengths, rather than percentages, which is what they are now. This is somewhat similar to massing where you can't mass a defence more than 5 times your strike without getting that lovely 'massive damage' message. In this case though, we have to deal with both shields and volleys on a MS as a single unit, because that's what they are or are meant to be in combat.
What we have atm is shields and volleys unlinked on a MS because the damage is done by percentage.
Spoiler
Initial masser on Field Marshal's 120t defence and on Rodwolf's 177t defence.
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 178,947,245,996,720 damage on Tekki's forces!
The forces of Rodwolf fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 3 damage on Tekki's forces!
A sentiment I can agree with, except some of them have never done a good job. For further details, PM me INGAME Id 9095.Jedi~Tank wrote:@ADMINS- ALL ADMINS, this is the absolute worst game forum I have ever seen (this sentiment is shared by many) It is amazing how ya;ll can go from good job to complete garbage in no time at all.
Jedi~Tank
---


Spoiler


- Noobert
- Sedin Triplet
- Posts: 12750
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:39 pm
- Alliance: Mayhem
- Race: A Canuck
- ID: 57572
- Location: Canada, British Columbia
- Myhill
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:16 am
- Alliance: Dominium of Chaos
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 56807
Re: Mothership Massing
only read this page, but I always thought once the shield strength was below 20% then the MS got blown to smitherines? so how can it possiably fire back? Not suggesting that MS get wiped out
but once there shields hit a certain level maybe they should be taken out of the game for 48 hours for major hull realignment, which isn't cheap, also once a MS fight starts they shouldn't be able to send away so it is a true battle with only one survivor...
but once there shields hit a certain level maybe they should be taken out of the game for 48 hours for major hull realignment, which isn't cheap, also once a MS fight starts they shouldn't be able to send away so it is a true battle with only one survivor...


Fate is for those too weak to determine their own destiny.
-
Colton
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2471
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:38 pm
- Alliance: ~Leaf Village~
- Race: Canadian
- ID: 1938534
- Location: Canada, British Columbia
- Noobert
- Sedin Triplet
- Posts: 12750
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:39 pm
- Alliance: Mayhem
- Race: A Canuck
- ID: 57572
- Location: Canada, British Columbia
-
Lore
- Fountain of Wisdom
- Posts: 10730
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:30 am
- Alliance: The Dark Dominium Empire
- Race: System Lord / AJNA
- ID: 1928117
- Location: On the dark side of the moon
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Mothership Massing
Why are you bumping it?

schuesseled wrote:And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.





