A way to kill Untrained Units? its GETTING OUT OF HAND

Sabben
Forum Irregular
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 7:30 pm
ID: 0
Location: half past insane

lol - I did think it through - I never said it had to be a low limit - plus it can be adjusted so that there is a base maximum for noobs.
Image
12agnar0k
Forum Addict
Posts: 2878
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:08 pm
ID: 0

now you've explained it a bti better, i prefer it too this destroying units idea, but i do liek to have way mroe uu than trained :D
Sabben
Forum Irregular
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 7:30 pm
ID: 0
Location: half past insane

as do I :mrgreen:
Image
User avatar
Rienna
Really Rienna :p
Posts: 3222
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:37 am
Alliance: T I T α N S
Race: Tollen
ID: 91926
Alternate name(s): La Reine Du Chaos

naw, I still think it stinks.

It means that the people at the top get to stay there because they'll have the most trained, so the most uu.

And your clarifications help nothing when it comes to PPT.

I don't think there should be restrictions on the amount of UU allowed. If you've played the game with the strategy of getting high UP or alot of friends, then that's your strategy. And it's a good one, because it means that you'll have more troops.

Think about it, just because you haven't put alot of naq into UP doesn't mean that you should limit someone elses UU because they did. While they were uping their UP they couldn't spend alot on stats, so to be fair to them, should we limit how high a persons stats should go? no, you tell them to suck it up because it was their choice to put naq into UP and not stats.

Well, same to you, if you put all your naq into stats and left your UP low, suck it up. You have less troops.




Again, I'm still in favor of being able to kill off a % of someones uu once their def. is gone. And this shouldn't be a problem unless you rarely check your account. Cause if you limit it to 10% a day or something like that, it still takes at least 10 days to kill off all their troops. If a person doesn't check their account within ten days and fix their defences (or recreate them) then they deserve to have to start again cause they weren't really playing to begin with.
Image
12agnar0k
Forum Addict
Posts: 2878
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:08 pm
ID: 0

are you proposing to kill uu only when all the defendign troops are gone, or when the player has no defsive action, because that would be great way of getting back at the no defense stat t'auris , thats cant be hurt much other than this or sabotage, but they usually have high covert too :D,

but i guess your suggestino has merit, but i dont see hwy we have to introduce the rule at all,
User avatar
Rienna
Really Rienna :p
Posts: 3222
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:37 am
Alliance: T I T α N S
Race: Tollen
ID: 91926
Alternate name(s): La Reine Du Chaos

lol, I'm suggesting after all the defending troops are killed as well.

And I only brought this up because other people were saying that something needed to be done about those people with alot of UU in their accounts.


I honestly don't mind if nothing happens. No new rule at all. However, when it comes to wars, it'd make it interesting to be able to cut back the persons chance of a quick recovery.
Image
12agnar0k
Forum Addict
Posts: 2878
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:08 pm
ID: 0

actually ive changed my mind, seeming as i never plan to have hardly any defenders, this rule can go ahead, will mean we can get back at t'auri one stat people yeah :evil: :twisted: :evil: :twisted: :twisted: :evil: :evil: :twisted: :twisted: :evil: :evil: :evil: :twisted: :evil: :twisted: :twisted: :evil: :evil: :twisted: :evil: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Osi
Forum Addict
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 10:15 am
ID: 0

i think its a stupid idea made by a noob
Image
Our failure is obvious, we had our foot on the throat of Humanity and we failed to step down hard enough.
Tekin
almost spammer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:14 am

I think that needing ALL the def gone is bad. It should just be harder to defend more UU.
Piker
Forum Newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:42 am

the people that have gotten UU deserve it they worked hard for it and shouldnt be taken away unless they whant it to
Tekin
almost spammer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:14 am

I worked hard for my def. When I left for a week and my computer shut down putting it in vacation mode, and my flight was too soon, I still lost it. People work hard for things, but the way of SGW is that it can vanish.
BELISKNER
Forum Expert
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 7:19 am
Alliance: Lone Wolf ~ Ex-Dirty Dozen
Race: Ancient
ID: 6116
Location: North Wales, U.K.

Lørd Øsiris wrote:i think its a stupid idea made by a noob


LoL, your a nub for saying that, something has got to be done to kill UU, I think all the people saying no just like an easy ride, afraid of a bit of hard work :wink:

Oh by the way I too had this idea so please don't call me a noob :evil: <Insert rank and name here> :)

Piker wrote:the people that have gotten UU deserve it they worked hard for it and shouldnt be taken away unless they whant it to


I myself have nearly 1mil UU and I wouldn't want them just taken away like your saying but there are many on 1mil UU like me and it would just make it that little bit more competative knowing a % or w/e of your UU could be gone.
We Fought Together, We Died Together


Play NOW!!


Dirty Dozen - The End of an Era
Image
{Ez0}Honvik
Forum Newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:30 am

I'm no noob i'm acended and been here for a long time just because I aint a forum junky doesnt mean I dont play :).

The reason I suggested it is people can ' BUY ' there way to the top by purchasing mass amounts of UU to gain the income then live on the internet so they can quickly store it. I too have worked hard not only acended but I raked up plenty of UU without purchasing it but the fact remains people do have multi's who feed UU to the community in sales ($ purchases) and there is zippo way to decrease it when realistically UU should play a part in taking a hit if your invaded. What is worst is tons of people can now with the new rules reduce rank and sit comfortably generating vast wealth and attack higher ranks with massive mods!.

So my suggestion wasnt so u can blow the UU over night but make it count for some of the losses with the new rules on ranks people wont be massed as much via sab or attacking if your massed its caus ur ranks are close and heck its called Star Gate Warz (sod the new name atm) not I got 20 million untrained units and I dont want new rules waa waa weaa.

What I'm suggesting is to make it more fun and cut the people buying UU to get to the top.
God Phate
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:43 pm
ID: 0
Location: 3811 Porter Creek Road, Santa Rosa, California, United States of America, North America, Earth.
Contact:

Well this game isn't going to amount to much when some people have millions of untrained units, which some do.
I heard about a main server reset, I support this if there are some tweaks made to the game to avoid a few people getting all the units again.
Remember Sarah and Fury
Image
User avatar
Sarif
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:23 am
ID: 0
Location: England!!!

God Phate wrote:Well this game isn't going to amount to much when some people have millions of untrained units, which some do.
I heard about a main server reset, I support this if there are some tweaks made to the game to avoid a few people getting all the units again.


I'd personnally hate resets, you work for something for so long just for it to reset and then start over again, about the killing uu idea i dont perticularly like this idea either, but maybe more of a way to attack someones covert.
Everything that has a beginning has an end!!
The purpose of life is to end.
Image
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”