Alliances mimium limit

[WaReHouSe]

this is'nt an idea that will change much but i'm tied of seeing little 1 man allainces that don't go ne where, so that if you perhaps put restrions and creation alliances, even if the creater has to have at least one officer so that when the allaince is created it has more than 1 member.

and there are many 1 man allaince with names like these that don't show much respect for the game or don't really work.

alliance leader description
Attack Me 314159 I give up just attack me
The Real Touri lordLuuk The touri (don't think i need to point out this error)
**Filtered** bags **Filtered** an alliance for all those who oppose the tauri and asgard rule
Replicators solar0 Alliance with the Asgard
Esker Alliance Apophis For officers and exclusive allies of Esker
? Istetz please send money
kick ass brownie Will dominate all
I have none D_Hoffryn
FREE Naq Yahoo Join me and recive a FREE 5 Naq

not too metion all the tauri alliance wannabes
hope this helps to you to see my point.

[Artiglio]

Esker Alliance Apophis For officers and exclusive allies of Esker

haha, you included esker alliance

[god]

FREE Naq Yahoo Join me and recive a FREE 5 Naq

I might do this one.

[trinity]

To go along with this, it would be cool if average power per alliance member was calculated. (for both alliances and even command/officers)
I wouldn't think it would be that hard to implement, just total power divided by number of members.

yes I am well aware this has been suggested before.

[WhiteyDude]

I think (don't quote me on it), that on the alliance battlefield pages, alliances with less than (5?) people in the alliance arn't listed?



/Whitey

[Forum Insecurity]

on the rankings page they are listed but i dont think i have seen any with less than 5 members ranked with any amount of power.

[WaReHouSe]

just 2 clarify, all the alliances i post only have 1 member, that esker allaince more particluar isn't the real esker alliance, now if i were him i wouldn't be happy about it.

i'm not concerned about the allaince rankings, but rather the allaince listings on the command center, half of that page is full of i member alliances and it takes too long to scroll past all these just to find a proper alliance

[WaReHouSe]

and yeah i have seen allaince in the battle fields with 3 members but were classified as unranked on the last couple of pages

[trinity]

just 2 clarify, all the alliances i post only have 1 member, that esker allaince more particluar isn't the real esker alliance, now if i were him i wouldn't be happy about it.

i'm not concerned about the allaince rankings, but rather the allaince listings on the command center, half of that page is full of i member alliances and it takes too long to scroll past all these just to find a proper alliance

You do realize that every alliance starts out with one player right? So, if any well-known player goes and starts a new alliance, they will by default have only one person (themself) in the alliance when they start it. 100s of people may join the first day, but it still started with only one member. What you are saying would mean there would be no more new alliances.

Perhaps you mean to say that after a time (say 3 weeks?) one person alliances are deleted? That would make a little more sense.

Or, you could suggest that the largest alliances be at the top of the page, and the smallest at the bottom of the page.

[WaReHouSe]

You do realize that every alliance starts out with one player right?

not realy because alliance with only one member is "not" really an alliance,
it takes 2 to tango and to cohort.

"an alliance is a joint relation ship" even if the leader is the domainate player.

[god]

You do realize that every alliance starts out with one player right?

not realy because alliance with only one member is really an alliance,
it takes 2 to tango and to cohort.

"an alliance is a joint relation ship" even if the leader is the domainate player.

he means that one person has to create the alliance in the game. Once that is done then other people can join.

[Aussie Babsy]

i think there should be a rule that sate's that you need to have group of 10 players to start an alliance, because 99% of those 1 player alliance's will only be just that one player