Just remember- It's a war game and I can mass you at any time. So be carefull on your post- I may think your with FUALL and you know what I do to FUALL lovers.
~Qacol~
Alliance Refrences good or Bad
- qacol
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1657
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:17 pm
- ID: 1924338
- Location: Chicago
- Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Am Heh wrote:No where did he say that warring him is bullying.![]()
He's complaining about 200 mill army sizes massing 5 mill army sizes...it's...a...war.

Spoiler

13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.
- semper
- The sharp-tongued devil you can't seem to forget...
- Posts: 7290
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:24 pm
- Race: God
- ID: 0
- Location: Forever watching...always here...
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
I add as a side note, we are no longer in the war thread, and discussing politics rather than you just being a failed nuisance, so I shall address you as if you were above the level of a fly. Talking to animals? Crazy...? Perhaps so... meh.
[sarcasm]lol...yeah, of course I OBVIOUSLY lie and I just throw out the droves of Propoganda.. lets not deny the fact that your members posted in that very public thread...but yeah.. im making this alllllll up...[/sarcasm]
Seriously Mathlord..all jokes and fun aside...what is this junk, really? My 10 year old cousin can think of better arguments to throw at me than half of that dribble. Please.. step up to the challenge or just go away. You're only hindering your side of the discussion here...
and I really would like some form of challenge..some half descent argument as to how anyone who reads that thread, is not going to see that what i've said is right. The TA can come here all they want and say I am lying, and everything.. but it's all their. You've dug your own graves with some sort of house sized digging machine that would make Megatron blush...
So.. freedom of speech is now outlawed by the TA..
Thanks for the support their Qacol. Anyone who wants to post in this thread! BEWARE! The non-bullying Tauri Alliance Empire, who apparently don't lie but in fact quite clearly do and let their members get away with it whilst their HC turns a blind eye, want you to know, that should you post...their is a chance Qacol...with his unprecedented understanding of things might take it as FUALL support and mass you..
oh! Wait a tick! You said you agree with Semper, who is posting anti-TA things.. ergo you support FUALL..
Sorry Ashu....sorry Nemesis Quarter, you had nothing to do with the war, but..you know... Making disgustingly distant connections through extensions is what the TAE are letting their members do best these days! For free lessons see Qacol.
That's not warring me though...is it? I am glad to see that mathlord is fine getting his power rush off attacking and, apparently (though we're yet to see this..) sitting on accounts that actually, could not do a thing to him without pretty much bending themselves over, OR are actually practically incapable of harming some, if not most of his counterparts.
Seriously TA, why..why are you bothering?
I might make a multi forum account in a moment, and start arguing for you...seen arguing with myself will probably be less embarrassing than what I am feeling for you lazily crawling over this continuous torrent of failures..
anyway! Next!
Mathlord wrote:Semper wrote:*cliche clapping*
![]()
Even I nearly believed that dribble...
TO ALL THOSE READING! What our current host failed to mention is another part of their ever so grand family...
The Tauri Alliance Massers.. yes.. they wear their tag, and are part of their 'empire'. These.. people.. act.. completely contrary to grand claims of this opening script of bravado.
I have proof.. of how these players do bully. Accounts of hundreds of millions of army size, attacking, massing and warring with accounts many times smaller than themselves, some less than 5million in total army size, who valiantly stand against their oppressors. A training alliance, that had no part in a war.
Furthermore, one of the Tauri Alliances own.. participates in this war.
So they do bully, the tauri alliance do hand out insults, and they do do a lot of things contrary to what this thread claims, and I shalt allow such lies to go unchallenged by an empire that condones what I have seen and then tries to claim otherwise.
So, if you want to join liars..., and if you want to join bullies...then, by all means.. sign up after reading this thread..
but by God... don't think you will get a moments peace from me on these forums...
I may be mean and I, as a person and player, definitely can bully certain individuals..but I don't lie.
What a lovely attempt to once again defame my alliance Semper. I would call it a roaring success considering the current counter arguments being handed to me... Now get your facts straight.They always are..We declared war on NS for harboring a FUALL supporter.Oh really? Are you sure about that now? Because when it first started the war was because she had apparently faked a coma, the story changes to suit the occasion once again. The entire point of Clarkey having to clean that thread is because we all had a nice argument about that exact reason...so I think this just supports my point about you guys not knowing exactly why you declared war..
There was a whole list of things posted, look in our war thread...another thing you always choose to forget.I don't choose to forget it..i'm just using what you guys have given me. The 'whole list' was posted a day or two after the initial reason.. which YOU conveniently forget too often Mathlord..
We don't bully, we fight hard. ARE YOU SERIOUS! O-M-G! That has to be the single, most undeniable, largest, unarguably hilarious joke I have read in my entire career on these forums. REALLY? You can actually say that, with any amount of conviction? Well that's just swell there Catherine..you go ahead and hold on to that one, keep saying it too.. it will.. without a doubt, make this place SO much more comical. If you call sitting on you in a war bullying, then lol. If you call what you are doing a war, or sitting on someones account.. you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. In fact I am just going to go straight ahead and look at every previous point and argument you have made, in conjunction with this (as that's all I got, fighting on your part seems non existent, but then again..admittedly we are ignoring you, personally..so as a note when I say you, factor in the TAM too..if it refers to ingame activity, will save me time) and say..you really do have no idea what you are talking about. I have not complained about near enough anything you have done to the Sect in this or any thread...i've complained about what you guys have NOT being doing to the Sect, and that's giving us a fight... All I have to say is quit your self-righteous whiningSorry????????????!*looks at previous post and re-plays in head* erm..., especially when it is unfounded and a sad attempt to drum up support for your failing war effort.Unfounded? Erm.. can you read? you attempted to reply to my thread, so I am presuming you can at least read some of the smaller words, judging by your arguments it cannot be larger than 4-letters or so. Sad attempt? Well.. there has been a lot of laughing and i'm enjoying seeing these silly arguments sent my way, they're no challenge..but everyone seems to be having a good time to me! Failing war effort? Again, do you not read? There is no war effort, because there is no war. the TAM do nothing to the Sect..we've been fighting another war, with many stats used and we've increased in numbers...*looks around frantically* can someone put this in Mathlordian please? I think five different people have said it to him, and short of putting it on a brick and smashing his skull in I don't think I know of another way of getting these messages to sink in?
@ Whoever else was complaining, we mass FUALL officers as officers have been in that war since day one.
You do, do you? You do something other than the poor macho posturing?
Oh and one last thing. As someone who is so knowledgable and on top of all their "facts", need I remind you it was Buck himself who personally added me, the TA member in question, to join this war. So? You're still in it arn't you?![]()
Now, go forth and keeping spewing lies and propaganda on the forum, I'll just laugh at your petty attempts to discredit us some more.
[sarcasm]lol...yeah, of course I OBVIOUSLY lie and I just throw out the droves of Propoganda.. lets not deny the fact that your members posted in that very public thread...but yeah.. im making this alllllll up...[/sarcasm]
Seriously Mathlord..all jokes and fun aside...what is this junk, really? My 10 year old cousin can think of better arguments to throw at me than half of that dribble. Please.. step up to the challenge or just go away. You're only hindering your side of the discussion here...
and I really would like some form of challenge..some half descent argument as to how anyone who reads that thread, is not going to see that what i've said is right. The TA can come here all they want and say I am lying, and everything.. but it's all their. You've dug your own graves with some sort of house sized digging machine that would make Megatron blush...
qacol wrote:Just remember- It's a war game and I can mass you at any time. So be carefull on your post- I may think your with FUALL and you know what I do to FUALL lovers.
~Qacol~
So.. freedom of speech is now outlawed by the TA..
oh! Wait a tick! You said you agree with Semper, who is posting anti-TA things.. ergo you support FUALL..
Mathlord wrote:Am Heh wrote:No where did he say that warring him is bullying.![]()
He's complaining about 200 mill army sizes massing 5 mill army sizes...it's...a...war.
That's not warring me though...is it? I am glad to see that mathlord is fine getting his power rush off attacking and, apparently (though we're yet to see this..) sitting on accounts that actually, could not do a thing to him without pretty much bending themselves over, OR are actually practically incapable of harming some, if not most of his counterparts.
Seriously TA, why..why are you bothering?
I might make a multi forum account in a moment, and start arguing for you...seen arguing with myself will probably be less embarrassing than what I am feeling for you lazily crawling over this continuous torrent of failures..
anyway! Next!
Accolades/Titles:
Spoiler
Started Playing: April 2005
Honours (5): Hall of Fame 2009. Annual Awards Host 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Winner (12): RP'er of the Year 2008, Runner Up Poster of the Year 2008, Debater of the Year 2008, War of the Year 2008, Poster of the Year 2009, Alliance of the Year 2009 (Nemesis Sect, Creator), Alliance War of the Year 2009 (Nempire vs Mayhem, Instigator), RP'er Runner Up 2009, Knew You'd Be Back 2010, Conflict of the Decade (FUALL v TF), Conflict of the Decade Runner Up (Ga vs TF), Alliance of the Decade (TDD).
Nominated (8): Writer of the year 2007, Avatar of the Year 2007, Poster of the Year 2007, Villain of the Year 2008, Player Sig 2008, Race Player of the Year 2009, Most Missed 2010, Alliance Leadership 2010, Most Missed 2011.
Commands (3): Supreme System Lord 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012. System Lord Council 2006 - present. Dark Lord and Emperor of the Nempire 2009 - 2011.
Alliances (9): DDE, EA, OSL, TFUR, DDEII, AI, RM, WoB, Nemesis.
Forum Roles (4): Former Misc GM, Race Mod (Goa'uld), Debate forum patriarch and mod.
Honours (5): Hall of Fame 2009. Annual Awards Host 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Winner (12): RP'er of the Year 2008, Runner Up Poster of the Year 2008, Debater of the Year 2008, War of the Year 2008, Poster of the Year 2009, Alliance of the Year 2009 (Nemesis Sect, Creator), Alliance War of the Year 2009 (Nempire vs Mayhem, Instigator), RP'er Runner Up 2009, Knew You'd Be Back 2010, Conflict of the Decade (FUALL v TF), Conflict of the Decade Runner Up (Ga vs TF), Alliance of the Decade (TDD).
Nominated (8): Writer of the year 2007, Avatar of the Year 2007, Poster of the Year 2007, Villain of the Year 2008, Player Sig 2008, Race Player of the Year 2009, Most Missed 2010, Alliance Leadership 2010, Most Missed 2011.
Commands (3): Supreme System Lord 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012. System Lord Council 2006 - present. Dark Lord and Emperor of the Nempire 2009 - 2011.
Alliances (9): DDE, EA, OSL, TFUR, DDEII, AI, RM, WoB, Nemesis.
Forum Roles (4): Former Misc GM, Race Mod (Goa'uld), Debate forum patriarch and mod.
- qacol
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1657
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:17 pm
- ID: 1924338
- Location: Chicago
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Semper,
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~


-
KSM
- Forum Intermediate
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:08 pm
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- ID: 57254
- Location: Faking a coma.....
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Semper do you just like to post for the sake of posting? I understand its what you do but come on we all know what you do ingame as well.
Fireinahole

former taf hc, but too lazy to change the sig
ilove me some me

former taf hc, but too lazy to change the sig
ilove me some me
- Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Semper, save for what you build on PPT, you sit there with a tiny little defense and nothing worth killing, so why would I do anything other than my usual farming, but that's aside the point of this thread.
Now, I could respond to each of your what? 13 individual replies or so to my statements? But let me keep this slightly more brief. We declared war because you were harboring Jordan, an FUALL officer, etc. etc. Prior to me being included in this war, people brought up her character issues and I responded and we went into a couple page long debate over that. It's a simple concept having multiple discussions in a long thread if you can wrap your head around it. But you know all of this, just choose to forget it to make your point.
Now yes, I call your points unfounded. Yes I call you a flat-out liar over some of your accusations or boasts. Why? Because both comments are true. You are so desperate to save face and look impressive in these forums that you will say whatever is necessary to get your point across or to "win" the argument. A true debater! A true politician even! The sad thing is when people can't see through the nonsense and only see a long post of delicately chosen words and are impressed by it, which is all you're going for anyway. I mean shoot, you ARE the person who others come up to and congratulate for your awesome posts are you not?
Now, I could respond to each of your what? 13 individual replies or so to my statements? But let me keep this slightly more brief. We declared war because you were harboring Jordan, an FUALL officer, etc. etc. Prior to me being included in this war, people brought up her character issues and I responded and we went into a couple page long debate over that. It's a simple concept having multiple discussions in a long thread if you can wrap your head around it. But you know all of this, just choose to forget it to make your point.
Now yes, I call your points unfounded. Yes I call you a flat-out liar over some of your accusations or boasts. Why? Because both comments are true. You are so desperate to save face and look impressive in these forums that you will say whatever is necessary to get your point across or to "win" the argument. A true debater! A true politician even! The sad thing is when people can't see through the nonsense and only see a long post of delicately chosen words and are impressed by it, which is all you're going for anyway. I mean shoot, you ARE the person who others come up to and congratulate for your awesome posts are you not?

Spoiler

13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.
-
AncientAnubis
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:31 am
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 0
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
qacol wrote:Semper,
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~
MASS ATTACKING: the ultimate skill in SGW. Proving over and over again you're competent enough to keep clicking Attack.
- Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
AncientAnubis wrote:qacol wrote:Semper,
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~
MASS ATTACKING: the ultimate skill in SGW. Proving over and over again you're competent enough to keep clicking Attack.
lol and yet Mass Attacking is IN SGW. Posting on a forum? So relevant

Spoiler

13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.
-
AncientAnubis
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:31 am
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 0
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Mathlord wrote:AncientAnubis wrote:qacol wrote:Semper,
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~
MASS ATTACKING: the ultimate skill in SGW. Proving over and over again you're competent enough to keep clicking Attack.
lol and yet Mass Attacking is IN SGW. Posting on a forum? So relevant
However, I have acknowledged many times I am a terrible poaster. We're still waiting on you to see the light.
- Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
AncientAnubis wrote:Mathlord wrote:AncientAnubis wrote:qacol wrote:Semper,
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~
MASS ATTACKING: the ultimate skill in SGW. Proving over and over again you're competent enough to keep clicking Attack.
lol and yet Mass Attacking is IN SGW. Posting on a forum? So relevant
However, I have acknowledged many times I am a terrible poaster. We're still waiting on you to see the light.
Oh noes, someone else insulting my posting abilites, whatever will I do?

Spoiler

13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.
-
AncientAnubis
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:31 am
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 0
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Mathlord wrote:AncientAnubis wrote:Mathlord wrote:AncientAnubis wrote:qacol wrote:Semper,
A talker and not a fighter. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL.
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game.
~Qacol~
MASS ATTACKING: the ultimate skill in SGW. Proving over and over again you're competent enough to keep clicking Attack.
lol and yet Mass Attacking is IN SGW. Posting on a forum? So relevant
However, I have acknowledged many times I am a terrible poaster. We're still waiting on you to see the light.
Oh noes, someone else insulting my posting abilites, whatever will I do?
As always, make another terrible post?
- Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
*Yawn* your banter is worse than Semper's 

Spoiler

13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.
- semper
- The sharp-tongued devil you can't seem to forget...
- Posts: 7290
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:24 pm
- Race: God
- ID: 0
- Location: Forever watching...always here...
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
qacol wrote:Semper,*glances up from staring into his bottomless cup of water on yet another sleepless night* I really should sort that out.. hmmm
A talker and not a fighter. Oh I fight, admittedly not much..i've never professed to being much of a fighter though...the forums are my arean, it's the only place left worth the effort.. Please go on I love this crap you post. As I said before I'll mass anyone I see fit and mass any one who is in bed with FUALL. Is that the best you can do? You can call it crap all you want..but its still true crap! I would go so far to agree with you and say anything posted ABOUT the game is crap, because of the current game state...but alas.. we digress don't we Qacole?
You can spin this any way you like, I can and will mass any one I wish- you can take that to the bank. I only spin it one way, ever Qacol.. the true way. If you don't know your words..which you guys seem not too, then it's not my fault...as for taking it to the bank, I think you know too much already about taking things too and from banks don't you! XD Also I hope you enjoy your post because thats all you can do in this game. Oh.. please.. *yawns*... I can log in and out of my account!Really.. you can at least try and insult me better..
I am not exactly going to report you to a mod because I am a big boy.. I can fight all my word battles..
![]()
~Qacol~
KSM wrote:Semper do you just like to post for the sake of posting? Sometimes I do wonder you know...but you guys just keep on giving my post's a point.. I understand its what you do but come on we all know what you do ingame as well.
From what I have seen... you don't really know much about anything...except...erm... staring at things and breathing.
Oh god.. here we go again... another rousing chorus from Mathlord..
Mathlord wrote:Semper, save for what you build on PPT, you sit there with a tiny little defense and nothing worth killing, so why would I do anything other than my usual farming, but that's aside the point of this thread.I couldn't agree more...yet again...I have to say though..by your own admittance now.. I do build something, a lot more than most, well actually two?.. of our current opposition can claim isn't it? But then again...im whatever.. Qacol and KSM were trying to say, I don't care to remember lol..something about playing with something..or was it not playing?
Now, I could respond to each of your what? 13 individual replies or so to my statements? I don't know, I am not sad enough to count, or even estimate..but if there are that many, have you wondered why there are that many? It's not because I can write for england Mathlord..it's because your points have that many holes in them..but yeah.. you could try and reply, and probably fail...again. But let me keep this slightly more brief.Oh please do, it's starting to hurt my mind reading your nonsense.. We declared war because you were harboring Jordan, an FUALL officer, etc. etc.Yes, I believe we may or may not have come to that conclusion at some point...*shifty glance to the right* hmm.. Prior to me being included in this war, people brought up her character issues and I responded and we went into a couple page long debate over that.Yeah, your people claimed that was the reason, originally, but changed it when pretty much everyone gave them slack for it, you popularity fearing bunch you! I mean, if you doubt me..I can get a lot of people to post and verify it, not all of them are in Nemesis..but then again considering it was our war thread they would compose a lot of the witnesses..however, not all....but do continue..
It's a simple concept having multiple discussions in a long thread if you can wrap your head around it. Well I can, im just not sure you'll manage it, I can ask my little sister to help you if you'd like? She is more sinister then I..but she's a helper at heart. But you know all of this, just choose to forget it to make your point.Choose to forget what exactly? The first half of this long post is about you trying to keep it short and not replying to most of my points because you can't. The second half of it, is you trying to fabricate more of something that comes out the worse smelling end of a bull...don't you worry though, I wont forget you trying to lie again.. thanks for that Mathlord, nearly dropped the ball there!
![]()
Now yes, I call your points unfounded.Well you would.. you most likely don't understand 90% of them..and naturally they're discrediting you, so you're going to try every trick in the book to get me.. Yes I call you a flat-out liar over some of your accusations or boasts.Again...naturally..but wrong.. Why? Oh, this is going to be rich... Because both comments are true. You are so desperate to save face and look impressive in these forums that you will say whatever is necessary to get your point across or to "win" the argument. A true debater! A true politician even!So, hold the phone here.. you're saying I lie..then you're admitting I am right? Surely not..even you're not that...or I suppose, the most like thing you're saying is a bastardized accusation that I lie and I am making unfounded things..erm..founded. Well, at the risk of being a broken record, that war thread pretty much speaks for itself.. I'll await for you to comment on that one really...as for winning the argument...so what lol? It doesn't exactly put me out tbh..as for the saving face and all that, I don't actually know a way to convince you how little I care, I think my long string of actions should speak for themselves..but you know..well..let's not go there again.. The sad thing is when people can't see through the nonsense and only see a long post of delicately chosen words and are impressed by it, which is all you're going for anyway.There is nothing to see through. Yet again, the facts are in the thread, the war thread. What hidden agenda could their be than shining a light on something you all did? What, should I have come to you and said..surrender or i'll drag your name through the dirt and then pin it there? Where is the fun in that? I mean shoot, you ARE the person who others come up to and congratulate for your awesome posts are you not? There are a few, and it's nice of them to do so...are you being nice Mathlord? Do I owe you an apology for my harsh tones about your personal character? (of course, not the TAM etc etc..but calling you a fly, and stupid...it might have bee...no, it wasn't.)
Accolades/Titles:
Spoiler
Started Playing: April 2005
Honours (5): Hall of Fame 2009. Annual Awards Host 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Winner (12): RP'er of the Year 2008, Runner Up Poster of the Year 2008, Debater of the Year 2008, War of the Year 2008, Poster of the Year 2009, Alliance of the Year 2009 (Nemesis Sect, Creator), Alliance War of the Year 2009 (Nempire vs Mayhem, Instigator), RP'er Runner Up 2009, Knew You'd Be Back 2010, Conflict of the Decade (FUALL v TF), Conflict of the Decade Runner Up (Ga vs TF), Alliance of the Decade (TDD).
Nominated (8): Writer of the year 2007, Avatar of the Year 2007, Poster of the Year 2007, Villain of the Year 2008, Player Sig 2008, Race Player of the Year 2009, Most Missed 2010, Alliance Leadership 2010, Most Missed 2011.
Commands (3): Supreme System Lord 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012. System Lord Council 2006 - present. Dark Lord and Emperor of the Nempire 2009 - 2011.
Alliances (9): DDE, EA, OSL, TFUR, DDEII, AI, RM, WoB, Nemesis.
Forum Roles (4): Former Misc GM, Race Mod (Goa'uld), Debate forum patriarch and mod.
Honours (5): Hall of Fame 2009. Annual Awards Host 2008, 2009, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Winner (12): RP'er of the Year 2008, Runner Up Poster of the Year 2008, Debater of the Year 2008, War of the Year 2008, Poster of the Year 2009, Alliance of the Year 2009 (Nemesis Sect, Creator), Alliance War of the Year 2009 (Nempire vs Mayhem, Instigator), RP'er Runner Up 2009, Knew You'd Be Back 2010, Conflict of the Decade (FUALL v TF), Conflict of the Decade Runner Up (Ga vs TF), Alliance of the Decade (TDD).
Nominated (8): Writer of the year 2007, Avatar of the Year 2007, Poster of the Year 2007, Villain of the Year 2008, Player Sig 2008, Race Player of the Year 2009, Most Missed 2010, Alliance Leadership 2010, Most Missed 2011.
Commands (3): Supreme System Lord 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012. System Lord Council 2006 - present. Dark Lord and Emperor of the Nempire 2009 - 2011.
Alliances (9): DDE, EA, OSL, TFUR, DDEII, AI, RM, WoB, Nemesis.
Forum Roles (4): Former Misc GM, Race Mod (Goa'uld), Debate forum patriarch and mod.
- Mathlord
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8920
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:56 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Tollan
- ID: 12759
- Location: On the Edge of the Unknown
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
You can't call posting your own skewed version of history that fits your perspective and the diatribe you persist on posting as shining a light on the situation, it's merely posting to make you look good, which we know you just love 
Now excuse me, the repetitive nature of this argument is really boring me here. Keep trying to make us look bad, I'll laugh some more at you guys in the morning...well later in the morning.
Oh and by the way Semper, going back on something we were talking about before the last time you pretended my posts didn't exist, how long have you been on the forums this night? Or am I to assume it's once again just 6 minutes of very fast post writing
Now excuse me, the repetitive nature of this argument is really boring me here. Keep trying to make us look bad, I'll laugh some more at you guys in the morning...well later in the morning.
Oh and by the way Semper, going back on something we were talking about before the last time you pretended my posts didn't exist, how long have you been on the forums this night? Or am I to assume it's once again just 6 minutes of very fast post writing

Spoiler

13:38 General Zeus Sabotage Repelled 377,977,330 details
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 305,393,963,879,000 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 4,635,986 of Mathlord's troops.
---
The forces of simpson_eh fought back with all they could, and managed to inflict 12 damage on Mathlord's forces!
They managed to eradicate 0 of Mathlord's troops.
- Norbe
- Forum Elder
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:49 pm
- Alliance: TÅ Åtlantis Expedition
- ID: 37481
- Contact:
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Semper, most of the "red writing" you added to my post adds nothing to this discussion. However I will entertain the notion that a small amount of it does and I will reply accordingly. I've made things easier for you by making replies in red. If you can debate with yourself, so can I
I was reffering to gain from TÅs perspective, perhaps I missed out one single word which may have made things confusing. I'm not going to spend ages proofreading my posts, i dont care enough, so things like that will happen on occasion. *insert red writing here about my inability to post* Regardless there is no gain for TÅ if we "bully" and "lie". That is the point I was making. *insert red writing here claiming we do it for funnies*
Yes I would like to elaborate. I will elaborate with an example. Player A, has a large army, but low stats due to a war. Player B is a newer player with a small army. He sees that Player A makes a lot of naq and chooses to take it. Player A then replies with a nice message saying "Please don't take my naq, i'm in a war". Player B says replies saying "I will take it whenever I want" and follows that up by several more attacks. Is Player A supposed to just let Player B continue to hit him, without hitting back, just because Player B has a smaller army? If Player A does hit back does that make him a "bully"? *Insert red writing about how TÅ logging into this game is bullying and claiming otherwise is lying*
In this example, Player A is the stereotypical TÅ member here. Perhaps not everyone conforms to the sterotype as well as others. *Insert red writing containing an internet abbreviation such as rofl or lol*
All I see is someone trying to form truth about a large group of people, without knowing all of the facts. *Insert red writing about how I don't know all of the facts, afterall I've only been a member of the alliance for years!* TÅs mandate has not changed. It won't change. Yes our reactions may be more aggressive than ever before, perhaps even our fuses have shrunk a tiny bit. But our actions are always for a reason. *Insert red writing containing lol or rofl again*
It is a shame that the war against FUALL has spilled over to involve your alliance. You seem like a decent bunch of people (with perhaps a few nameless exlusions). However you did have plenty of time to avoid this; almost every other alliance has managed to avoid getting caught up in it. *Insert red writing claiming you did nothing, you dont know who Jordan Sullivan is, nor how her or anyone else was aiding our enemy, and that this is an unprovoked attack just purely to bully*
If you wish to now cite The Pond war as another example of TÅ bullying, let me inform you that there have been many issues between TÅ and The Pond members over the past couple of years. When their names appeared in our logs and their diplomats were not being friendly, we simply raised our hand yet again. *Insert red writing "yet another example of TÅF bullying"*
And finally, to once again address what is said in our recruitment thread. All of the senior TÅ members agree with me here. *Insert red writing claiming we are good at lying collectively as well as individually* Unfortunately there are numerous incidents lately of wars which have arisen that could have been avoided. *Insert red writing blaming TÅ for this* Long wars do have an effect on everyone involved. In the future, when the dust settles on all battlefields, TÅ will still be who we always have been. We are now, its just we don't give you chance to poke your head out to see. Feel free to try, but we have our guns aimed at the right spot just incase. *insert red WTH?*
For everyone other than Semper. You have no reason to fear TÅ. Our guns have enough targets, so long as you don't give us a reason to point them at you. Leave us alone (and don't get caught helping our enemies) and we shall do the same to you.
~Norbe~
P.S. I'm only posting once per day max in this thread. Will check it again tomorrow if I feel like it.
Norbe wrote:What possible gain could ever arise out of the claims you are making?
I was reffering to gain from TÅs perspective, perhaps I missed out one single word which may have made things confusing. I'm not going to spend ages proofreading my posts, i dont care enough, so things like that will happen on occasion. *insert red writing here about my inability to post* Regardless there is no gain for TÅ if we "bully" and "lie". That is the point I was making. *insert red writing here claiming we do it for funnies*
Semper wrote:Would you like to elaborate on that more before I reply to it? It can be a double edged sword... and of course we all dislike them. Is this saying it's ok for a player of 100+mill army size account to attack and mass an account 1/20th or less of their size? Does the TA condone those actions?
Yes I would like to elaborate. I will elaborate with an example. Player A, has a large army, but low stats due to a war. Player B is a newer player with a small army. He sees that Player A makes a lot of naq and chooses to take it. Player A then replies with a nice message saying "Please don't take my naq, i'm in a war". Player B says replies saying "I will take it whenever I want" and follows that up by several more attacks. Is Player A supposed to just let Player B continue to hit him, without hitting back, just because Player B has a smaller army? If Player A does hit back does that make him a "bully"? *Insert red writing about how TÅ logging into this game is bullying and claiming otherwise is lying*
In this example, Player A is the stereotypical TÅ member here. Perhaps not everyone conforms to the sterotype as well as others. *Insert red writing containing an internet abbreviation such as rofl or lol*
Semper wrote:This is not propaganda, its truth and you sure as hell better expect anyone reading this will know that before the end of the discussion.
All I see is someone trying to form truth about a large group of people, without knowing all of the facts. *Insert red writing about how I don't know all of the facts, afterall I've only been a member of the alliance for years!* TÅs mandate has not changed. It won't change. Yes our reactions may be more aggressive than ever before, perhaps even our fuses have shrunk a tiny bit. But our actions are always for a reason. *Insert red writing containing lol or rofl again*
It is a shame that the war against FUALL has spilled over to involve your alliance. You seem like a decent bunch of people (with perhaps a few nameless exlusions). However you did have plenty of time to avoid this; almost every other alliance has managed to avoid getting caught up in it. *Insert red writing claiming you did nothing, you dont know who Jordan Sullivan is, nor how her or anyone else was aiding our enemy, and that this is an unprovoked attack just purely to bully*
If you wish to now cite The Pond war as another example of TÅ bullying, let me inform you that there have been many issues between TÅ and The Pond members over the past couple of years. When their names appeared in our logs and their diplomats were not being friendly, we simply raised our hand yet again. *Insert red writing "yet another example of TÅF bullying"*
And finally, to once again address what is said in our recruitment thread. All of the senior TÅ members agree with me here. *Insert red writing claiming we are good at lying collectively as well as individually* Unfortunately there are numerous incidents lately of wars which have arisen that could have been avoided. *Insert red writing blaming TÅ for this* Long wars do have an effect on everyone involved. In the future, when the dust settles on all battlefields, TÅ will still be who we always have been. We are now, its just we don't give you chance to poke your head out to see. Feel free to try, but we have our guns aimed at the right spot just incase. *insert red WTH?*
For everyone other than Semper. You have no reason to fear TÅ. Our guns have enough targets, so long as you don't give us a reason to point them at you. Leave us alone (and don't get caught helping our enemies) and we shall do the same to you.
~Norbe~
P.S. I'm only posting once per day max in this thread. Will check it again tomorrow if I feel like it.
Albert Einstein:"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
Master Splinter:"The moral high ground...the best place to sight your artillery"

Master Splinter:"The moral high ground...the best place to sight your artillery"


, and if you want to join bullies...then, by all means.. sign up after reading this thread..
but by God... don't think you will get a moments peace from me on these forums...