farm hippyfool

[bebita]

God HippyFool [ The Crazy Chickens ]
don't ezitate in farming this "player"
if anyone will interfer will just end like him

[bebita]

ahhh
u should say thanks to alehandro since hippyfool just polarise me

[Slugworth Assrot]

[R0B3RT]

good joob guy s

[HippyFool]

Feel free to farm me...or alehandro who now has 0 def

I have small defense, but i will mass anyone who farms me.

Your choice

[[BoT] Jason]

thats a good attitude to play with

[5forV]

"I calculate your losses at about what you took from me. I said on forum i will mass anyone that hits me, if you hadnt been someone i somewhat like you would have lost your MS and def and spies.

It\'s your choice if you hit me again or not."

Hmmm, I did farm you so you semi-massed me back to double the amount of damage/naq stolen that i did to you... so given your logic, I should even the playing field maybe, or double the stakes again?

Hippy i like you as a person, I think you're an alright guy, i.e. I somewhat like you too, but your gameplay this era, and i don't think i stand alone here, has been less than acceptable..
Unless your a crazy chicken of course..?

All i'm wondering is, if we all keep farming you, and you keep massing us all, and you only have x amount of turns left, then you're not going to be able to keep up in massing us all.. for sure you have a stockpile of naq in your bank and probably a few other stockpiles in a few other accounts, but it can all be easily destroyed..
From what i know for all the players who want to be keeping you down you have less then 1k of turns to spread between them, give or take a hundred.
i.e. you will run out before everyone else does.

And I'm making these thoughts public, because I'm wondering does anyone feel the same way? Am I being naive to think if we all sit on him we will keep a feeder down? And am I ignoring the obvious that his chicken friends will come to his aid (or will they leave it to hippy to dispute with the rest)?
I have the feeling that the chickens will stick by his side, as it seems it has become a natural instinct for a chicken to feed, and whilst they remain a chicken, by their very nature requiring feeding, they defend Hippy's style of gameplay.
I know of at least two decent players who no longer stand by his side. What say the rest of them? With him, without him, or just going to sit on the fence?

[bebita]

ahhh
ps hippy doesn't have to much in his bank and his bank is not to big
more then 3 tril bank doesn't have so in normal conditions is not in running for top 5

[S1eepy]

Accountancy
(1) farmed
(2) masses back

Hippy |||| V5forV
(1)
-50b naq ||||| +50b naq

(2)
+\-0 naq |||| -100b naq

Total
-50b naq |||| -50b naq

Both people even. That's how I work it out anyway. Used fictional figures, and assumed no cost of massing... But you get the idea?


As far as the smaller bank goes.. That brings up an issue for next wave...

What about people with small banks who give there naq to someone else to hold? They will be seen as feeders with transparant logs

[daveb1973]

I don't approve of Hippys actions in any way, but being part of the Crazy Chickens doesn't automatically mean I've been fed at any point during this wave (or previous waves)

I spend at least a couple hours a day farming and my job allows me to be online 7 hours a day, 5 days a week, hence my current rank 6.

Hopefully the stats should speak for themselves:

Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 22,563,289,338,496
Attack Turns Used(1) 136,980

Zod1973

[bebita]

Accountancy
(1) farmed
(2) masses back

Hippy |||| V5forV
(1)
-50b naq ||||| +50b naq

(2)
+\-0 naq |||| -100b naq

Total
-50b naq |||| -50b naq

Both people even. That's how I work it out anyway. Used fictional figures, and assumed no cost of massing... But you get the idea?


As far as the smaller bank goes.. That brings up an issue for next wave...

What about people with small banks who give there naq to someone else to hold? They will be seen as feeders with transparant logs

and they should pay for that
with a big BAN
if someone wants better coverts or other thuings are manny ways to be able to do that
then whats the use to keep quantum alive and putting $ in him if is legal to have "RL friends": that will solve any problems we have during of one wave(hippy prove that even if he was farmed like hell this wave and mased he didn't lose anything he even become stronger)
while other players who had way more manny turns and naq that him are still behind him
how?
we know that
now hippyfool saying that he farmed like me
it could be true
but i know he took over 2 mil uu from market that over 50 mts waste there
that less then me over 100 k turns
thats less over 15 tril in farming
how he could farm better is just a cheating
i know that if quantum doesn't feed admin with $ it will become a closed game
i don't want that and i like to play a game who have a end in some point

[bebita]

i am still waiting a print that to show that i mistake in my affirmation
but i doubt that will appear because is all true and maybe more that i am thinking
if he have rl friend here he is playing the same in sgw?

[S1eepy]

So you think people who store naq for others should be banned? That will affect a lot of small - medium players. I have stored naq for people in the past, so I know it is done. And I think it is a very common tactic amount other alliances.

Having a large bank is already useful enough, without limiting small players further.

[EnVy!]

true... without large bank you force them to buy weapons and without large bank they dont have covert level to protect weapons from sab.

[bebita]

without $ putting ingame admin will lose interes for keeping game aliave
while u incouragge them to not put $ ingame in some point game will be closed not bringing nothing in admin pocket