How to defend myself against multi allegations?

[lone dragon]

Just a question to the mod's I have recieved a "multi" message about an occurance of thinking I have muli accounts just wondering the procedure about defending myself against the allogations?

[Juliette]

Moved

This is a better place as a 2 years old thread to place your question in, Lone Dragon.

[~[ Greased Gerbil ]~]

L.D. is one of my officers and definitely not a multi. He transfered ATs to my account using "Give turns" box on my profile. We are classmates at La Trobe University, and he apparently did this from within our university network.

1. 90% of my log-ins are from my home in Albury. L.D. never has.
2. The remainder are from the La Trobe University network. Most of L.D's logins (I think) are from this network.
3. The remainder are apparently from his out-of-semester home in Melbourne (350km from Albury). I never have

I'll contact admin and request an IP exception. This all came about using the "Give" function instead of the broker.

G.G.

[CABAL]

Well, if you ARE innocent, there is no reason to defiantly defend yourself, as if you're innocent, you're innocent... Fighting back only increases suspicion...

[muffafuffin]

defiantly defending himself? they asked a question and gave reasons for the occurence within the forum which is in existence for just this function. How does using the forum as intended and giving the information most people ask posters in this area make them suspicious? Leave them be.

[~[ Greased Gerbil ]~]

Hmmm... I got no "multi" warning from the system. I'm fine. I am not defending myself, I am defending LD. If you want to incite suspicion, please read the post properly.

Anyhow, I fail to understand how highlighting evidence in my favour is suspicious. That is how you prove a point... with evidence.

I could have stayed silent and left LD to get banned, instead I spoke up in his defence.

[~[ Greased Gerbil ]~]

@ muffafuffin: Thanks.

You must have posted just as I was writing mine. "Please read..." wasn't directed at you.

[CABAL]

You got my idea wrong.

If I were to accuse someone of multiing, if they are really multiing, they would try to provide excuses for the 'suspicious behaviour'.

If they weren't multiing, a good 'I'm not multiing, if you're so suspicious then why would you approach me instead of the admin?' would be quite sufficient.

[~[ Greased Gerbil ]~]

I definitely see your point. I just like to be upfront with the facts. If I were admin, "I'm not a multi, trust me" wouldn't really pass. I'd want the excuses.

I just thought I'd chime in because LD was really worried, when I spoke to him at uni this morning, that his account would be deleted; and it was giving turns to me that got him in bother.

[lone dragon]

Look all it did was say "possible multi" nothing has come from this, but I just wanted to know what to do in case something did.
Lone dragon