Possible Avatar

[~Vix~]

Any issues if i resize this for my avatar? (you'll see the obvious issues...)

[spoiler][/spoiler]
Mods sorry if this breaks rules, hence me asking first...

[Empy]

Technically it probably does break a rule, but I have no problem with it..

[Reschef]

though I'm not a mod I gotta say it seems ok.

[~Vix~]

Thanks, just with the nude chick i thought i better check. Thanks for fast replies...

[Clarkey]

Thanks, just with the nude chick i thought i better check. Thanks for fast replies...

Unfortunately this image does bare nudity, and although it is used as art..... what is art for one can easily be seen as pornography for another.

6 ) The posting of pornographic or other criminal content is prohibited on these boards.

This has been discussed between the Mods and Admins and it has been agreed that it is not allowed. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and if we allow this image, then we only open ourselves to other "nude" images appearing on the forums.

We understand you may be disappointed with this decision, but we have to keep the decision consistent.

[~Vix~]

Thats okie pal. I'll take it down now.

[semper]

Thanks, just with the nude chick i thought i better check. Thanks for fast replies...

Unfortunately this image does bare nudity, and although it is used as art..... what is art for one can easily be seen as pornography for another.

6 ) The posting of pornographic or other criminal content is prohibited on these boards.

This has been discussed between the Mods and Admins and it has been agreed that it is not allowed. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and if we allow this image, then we only open ourselves to other "nude" images appearing on the forums.

We understand you may be disappointed with this decision, but we have to keep the decision consistent.

ahem...

I believe that this forum rule has already been in question many times this year, though the decision to accept it has already been allowed.. as demonstrated during the award periods.

I point you to article A..

however...
one suggests you attend to the issue of Killy's signature before absolute judgement here is given. It is.. after all still his signature.

[Mordack]

Thanks, just with the nude chick i thought i better check. Thanks for fast replies...

Unfortunately this image does bare nudity, and although it is used as art..... what is art for one can easily be seen as pornography for another.

6 ) The posting of pornographic or other criminal content is prohibited on these boards.

This has been discussed between the Mods and Admins and it has been agreed that it is not allowed. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and if we allow this image, then we only open ourselves to other "nude" images appearing on the forums.

We understand you may be disappointed with this decision, but we have to keep the decision consistent.

ahem...

I believe that this forum rule has already been in question many times this year, though the decision to accept it has already been allowed.. as demonstrated during the award periods.

I point you to article A..

however...
one suggests you attend to the issue of Killy's signature before absolute judgement here is given. It is.. after all still his signature.

We have a different administration now to the one which we did then, and whatever decisions or judgements were doled out then may not be applicable now.

[semper]

Thanks, just with the nude chick i thought i better check. Thanks for fast replies...

Unfortunately this image does bare nudity, and although it is used as art..... what is art for one can easily be seen as pornography for another.

6 ) The posting of pornographic or other criminal content is prohibited on these boards.

This has been discussed between the Mods and Admins and it has been agreed that it is not allowed. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and if we allow this image, then we only open ourselves to other "nude" images appearing on the forums.

We understand you may be disappointed with this decision, but we have to keep the decision consistent.

ahem...

I believe that this forum rule has already been in question many times this year, though the decision to accept it has already been allowed.. as demonstrated during the award periods.

I point you to article A..

however...
one suggests you attend to the issue of Killy's signature before absolute judgement here is given. It is.. after all still his signature.

We have a different administration now to the one which we did then, and whatever decisions or judgements were doled out then may not be applicable now.

ergo my point of bringing it up.

[Clarkey]

ergo my point of bringing it up.

Thank you.