Do you Support Random Massing yes or no ?

[ƒëmmë ƒatalë]

i dont now how to mass ..... can someone help me please ?

it starts with you attacking harch. then the fun starts......

lmao...

and no I don't support random massings.

[Brdavs]

No.

Because people borrow turns to do `em and dont pay back.

[fremen]

I have massed people randomly and I have massed people for my own reasons. The random massings are not nearly as satisfying as massing someone for an arbitrary reason. Kikaz posted a nice list.

And I am not advocating picking on the weak or the small alliance/player. I am talking about things like Juan massing everyone ranked in the top 100. Or when STE made the top ten a hit list and then started accepting bribes to not mass them. For those who claim to be bored, they should look at rank one at take a shot (alliance or player depending on how much heat you can handle). Otherwise they are more talk then action. I have taken my shots and I will tell you that the boredom faded to nothing when the more powerful opponents came knocking. I tip my hat to all my current and former opponents of skill, you know who you were and still are in some cases.

All that to say you can put me in the yes column, but a reason makes it better.

[Duderanch]

i dont now how to mass ..... can someone help me please ?

It's because you have too many thumbs

[Hookoo2]

No.

Because people borrow turns to do `em and dont pay back.

NO im sorry thats just robe

[agapooka]

I see a huge difference between unprovoked attacks on weaker players and unprovoked attacks on stronger players.

The former is cowardice, whereas the latter is admirable. Combined with good planning and strategy, the latter can also be successful.

If a 7x ascended, large alliance player with large 350mil army masses me with no good reason, am I to believe that that player was too frightened to attack someone that was more of a challenge, instead? It isn't even a question of morality to me, as I couldn't care less about whether or not it's right. It's a question of how a player broadcasts themselves to the world, saying, loud and clear, that they would rather pick on someone that has no chance of hitting them back.

An unprovoked attack on a stronger opponent, however, isn't even received with the same energy. From what I could gather from personal experience and comments from others, such attacks are usually met with congratulations when successful, although that congratulations may be followed up with a retaliation - a risk that the initiator accepted!

Agapooka

[xXxsephirothxXx]

i dont now how to mass ..... can someone help me please ?

it starts with you attacking harch. then the fun starts......

Its not really that fun, harch takes it on his back and cry's like a girl... i have seen his logs out and in, shame on him really

[harchester]

:O


my logs are far better then urs

[whereub]

i dont now how to mass ..... can someone help me please ?

It's because you have too many thumbs

doh .... any ideas?

[Doc]

If people complain peoplez r randomly massingz. either STHU or do suminz boutz it
k.

[schuesseled]

There's always a reason. However moronic or clever, there still within lies a reason, whether someone else thinks its important or not, doesnt make it not a reason. But if you (the masser) are massing somebody, their is a process by which you came to mass them, in the process their is reasoning.

There's such a thing as a "random massing" by its definition, but I would doubt anybody does it. And if you think you do, I would like you to explain your process because its probably not as random as you think it is.

As such I respectfully request, that the name of this thread be changed to.

Re: Do you Support Massing For Reason's Of Wavering Consequence

the "yes or no ?" bit will no longer fit into the new thread name due to its increased length, sorry.

..

my answer to the question which I think you were trying to get at, Do I support massings for reasons of wavering consequence, no, I dont even support massings for reasons of gigantic consequence.

However, my answer to the question you asked even if inadvertently is yes. Random Massings in the true sense, sure why not, sounds like fun. Someone start rolling a dice and pick someone at random to mass, in all likely hood, youll pick some random inactive account 99% of the time. And eventually if you do find someone active, its a good chance it may be someone in your Alliance or that you consider an ally/friend/colleague/aqauintance

[arkangel13]

YEs i support massings random they are not.

-stat padders
-5 point gnr ranges under 100 mill uu army
-planet padders
-planet names ex. i will mass ur alliance or those types.
-people attack my alliance
-people message me after naq hit threatening me.


usually never random as in saying rank 221 mass him.

peace out

[damien_omen]

If people complain peoplez r randomly massingz. either STHU or do suminz boutz it
k.

edited

[harchester]

YEs i support massings random they are not.

-stat padders
-5 point gnr ranges under 100 mill uu army
-planet padders
-planet names ex. i will mass ur alliance or those types.
-people attack my alliance
-people message me after naq hit threatening me.


usually never random as in saying rank 221 mass him.

peace out

Rank 221 ehh i herd he looked at Ricos funny from a third party person

lets get em

[Duderanch]