TGW FFA Idea.

[Jim]

Hello everyone! I have decided to try and hold a free for all fun war between players. This will give people a chance to show off, mass friends and enemy's, have fun and learn loads!
Talked to a number of people on msn and had a decent amount of support and enthusiasm for the idea but we are still not sure on details but know we just want it to happen.
So! I would like to know just how many people are interested and if you guys have any ideas!

main points i think are important are as follows:
Rule. What rules for the war?
Requirements to take part. should there be any? What should they be?

Size restriction. Should there be one? Would it be too confusing with 50+ people or should we just let EVERYONE who wants to take part?

Time limit. Should there be one? How long should it last?

Winner. Should there be a winner? or a table? how could it be decided?



My opinions SO FAR are:
Rules: Mass anyone that is involved. Do not get any outside forces involved. 50b defence on log in.

Requirements: Need to be 100m army size to take part.

Size: 50-75 people

Time limit :between 3 and a week

Winner: Would like a winner but not sure how so far really... two ideas i have had so far are:
1)Players vote on who they think should win
2)Points based system- 1 point for 0 a defence etc.

both flawed i guess.

Suggestions and discussion please!
Much love
Jim

[~Coyle~]

Hmmm good idea, but i dont see the point of having a min of 100mil, im selling off uu constantly for my MS so i dont expect to be over 100mil again for a long time, how about 80

[Jim]

yeah was thinking maybe actually 70

[TheAnimal]

I like the idea! And I think 70mil would be a good min AS.

I don't know if I think there should be just one winner. Why not make it multiple winners, one for massers, one for ACers and so on, and people are being submitted in every category, so everyone can get best masser or acer etc.

[Jim]

I like the idea! And I think 70mil would be a good min AS.

I don't know if I think there should be just one winner. Why not make it multiple winners, one for massers, one for ACers and so on, and people are being submitted in every category, so everyone can get best masser or acer etc.

good idea. i was thinking of doing top 5 anyway

[Sammael]

Top 5

Top Defence Masser
Top AC'er (this would mean a limit aswell)
Top MS Masser
Top Stabber
Top Overall

or just have the one.

if i have any ideas about how to chose i will post them later

[Tek]

Id love the opportunity to get my account slapped about for a few days by new faces.

I likes.

[Jim]

Top 5

Top Defence Masser
Top AC'er (this would mean a limit aswell)
Top MS Masser
Top Stabber
Top Overall

or just have the one.

if i have any ideas about how to chose i will post them later

top stabber? we got any knife carrying maniacs around?

what about how winner is decided?

[semper]

hmmm... you can just mass who you want anyway... why limit yourself?

[Quina Quen]

Hi Jim,

Like your idea.

My two cents are simple enough - I think for an event like this to take place it is crucial to have a set time period, and one which all participants are strictly bound to. 'Speed Wars' are something that come to mind, and certainly something that would test the capabilities of all involved, as time as we all know is money in this game.

[Sammael]

ok here goes

Rules:
1. Mass anyone that is involved. (All Included)
2. Do not get any outside forces involved. (If caught then kicked out)
3. Defence On Log In 50-100 bill, MS rebuilt.
4. No PPT with in the time period Unless A really good reason For. (post it, if you can.)

Requirements:
1. Need to be A min of 70mill AS
2. Willing to Mass anyone even if friends.

Size:
20 Min Players
60 max players

Time limit :
Min: 7 days
Max: 14 days

The topic in the GC
only have RP post and a separate discussion thread.

Winner:
1) Players vote on who they think should win.
2) Points based system- 1 point for 0 a defence etc.
3) A selected group chosen before the war begins know only to the host of the game votes on who wins (these would be non bias so be better if we had non alliance team members in the group.

What you win
1) A Title for yourself, and you will keep it until the next round.
2) A sig which someone will make .

~SAM

[Jim]

ok here goes

Rules:
1. Mass anyone that is involved. (All Included)
2. Do not get any outside forces involved. (If caught then kicked out)
3. Defence On Log In 50-100 bill, MS rebuilt.
4. No PPT with in the time period Unless A really good reason For. (post it, if you can.)

Requirements:
1. Need to be A min of 70mill AS
2. Willing to Mass anyone even if friends.

Size:
20 Min Players
60 max players

Time limit :
Min: 7 days
Max: 14 days

The topic in the GC
only have RP post and a separate discussion thread.

Winner:
1) Players vote on who they think should win.
2) Points based system- 1 point for 0 a defence etc.
3) A selected group chosen before the war begins know only to the host of the game votes on who wins (these would be non bias so be better if we had non alliance team members in the group.

What you win
1) A Title for yourself, and you will keep it until the next round.
2) A sig which someone will make .

~SAM

great stuff sam! agree with everything except:
7-14 days can be too long if your loosing 150-200b defence + ms daily+ attacking constantly.
in #3 for the winner, how will the select group know? would they be in the war? if they are its unfair because they may not get at all attacked by one guy who has attacked everyone else 1000x over. if they arnt in the war then all they have to go on is rp posts etc.


Hey DD thanks for the support thats pretty much what i have in mind for this . were you in BWP/B by the way, i think i remember you from when i was in BWP...

Semper, not all of us have the privilege of not having an alliance or any friends

[Stickm@n]

Could use temp ME to decide winner

Edit: But then again, they could be attacking others to get that, so that's flawed.

[Jim]

Could use temp ME to decide winner

people can just go ME hunting out of the war.
and farming
and raiding etc etc etc

[Stickm@n]

Yeah, just added that kinda flaw in post. Hmm.