why?

[bebita]

Warning issued. Benny the G, you are hereby ordered to cease and desist your spamcapade.
Bebita, next post derailing this thread and you will be warned as well.

We're done. Temporary lock until all non-involved parties and Benny the G can focus back in their respective roles. You're here to cheer or boo. Do anything else, and there will be hell to pay.

Authorisation rescinded. Resume basic function.

my posts where conected to that vendetta and my posts where due that vendetta
why i am not allowed to have a position against that vendetta?

[bebita]

There are a few options you have, here.

If you want your own vendetta with Clarkey, make one.
If you want to oppose the approval Clarkey got for this vendetta, talk to Zeek.
If you want to cheer Benny the G, that's fine, you can do that in the thread.
If you want to bring up old history, that's fine, but do so in a new thread - which I predict will be removed quickly.


So essentially; you were neither booing nor cheering, just threatening/informing Clarkey of his impending doom at your hands. Fine, but not in that thread.


You understand, that such things need be done in other places. Vendetta threads are vendetta threads. Not multi-purpose war threads.

Have a good night,
Ciao!
Jo

i got this pm from mr mod but i still don;t understand how i broke forum rulles?

[Juliette]

Explain to me how: "OMG u cant do dis ima sit on u 4evah" translates to an opinion about that vendetta.
I won't stick around to hear your answer.

You were not warned, you received, like everyone in that thread already had, a simple verbal warning. So please, next time when you want to complain about something, read a bit more carefully, and maybe you'll discover you are complaining about something that is not even an issue.




Bebi, you did NOT receive a warning. Stop fussing about it as if you did.

Wasting the ombudsman's time like that. What a shame. I know you know better than that.

[bebita]

maybe i miss placed my question
but i repeat my self
how i broke forum rulle?
so in the future if a guy say something against me in my vendetta u will warn him?

Explain to me how: "OMG u cant do dis ima sit on u 4evah" translates to an opinion about that vendetta.

what else it is?

[Jim]

Please provide a link to the thread

[bebita]

viewtopic.php?f=124&t=160394

[Clarkey]

Please provide a link to the thread

No rudeness intended but this is not an ombudsman issue.

The author of this thread is posing a question to the moderator in question, and therefore belongs here: viewforum.php?f=128

No warning was given.
No ban was issued.

Therefore NOT an ombudsman issue.

But to add my bit, the vendetta had nothing to do with my previous history on the forums. Therefore any talk of that would have been possibly considered as off topic. As is often said it could have been handled via PM rather than the off topic stuff being posted on forums. But hey, this is a place where people don't learn.

[bebita]

i have posted my opinion regarding u declaring a vendetta to a guy
and i have posted and my reasons why i am against
why i am in danger for a warn for that?
can someone explain me clear?
and mods receive a warning if they threat members of this forum without reasons?
i am srry clarkey but it is your history made by your hand
learn to live with it because u made it

[Clarkey]

i am srry clarkey but it is your history made by your hand
learn to live with it because u made it

I am living with it. in fact the majority are trying to move on from it.
It only seems to be a few people that continue to bring it up.

[Hitchkok]

As for this thread, bebita, I suggest keep trying in pm's with radiance, if that doesn't work, speak with the ombudsman, ask for there advice, or approach radiances gm and talk to them. I doubt you will get the outcome you want, but trying these avunues won't hurt. If you need anything else, I can help to.

and, come to think of it, what IS the outcome you want?

[zeekomkommer]

the ombudsman primary task is to help settle issues between the forum staff and the forum users. this does not imply that we only handle bans and warnings. if ou do not agree with the way a moderator treats you you can ask help from the ombudsman who if there is valid reason will bring this to the admins atention.

now i think what universe was trying to say bebita is that if you would have just posted. your first post it woudn't have been that big of a deal. but if you wanted to discuss it further it should have gone via PM. cuz discussing it further is bringing the topic (benny Vs clarkey) to a topic clarckey Vs bebita talking about benny Vs clarkey

so next time you do not agree with a vendetta bebita, a forum pm forks absolutely fine aswell in my opinion

[bebita]

yeah zeek maybe
but like it was in this case comunity should know(must know) that they are still players who disagree with past actions of some players
i still don't bellieve i broke any forum rulles in what i did to be in danger for a warning even if i moved a litllte vendetta in a clarkey vs bebita thing but that was just because that vendetta because like time sayed there is not a bebita clarkey vendetta

agreed if boths sides was against what i sayed in their vendetta i was in danger for a warn but since only one side was upsaid about my action i don't see the reason

[zeekomkommer]

well teh rpoblem with reminding ppl about clarkeys history is that till date it has derailed every topic it was ever brought up in.

therefor the mods are very strickt about it cuz they don't want to clean up a thread every 5min cuz ppl wanne talk about clarkey

[bebita]

and is my fault?

[Juliette]

and is my fault?

Yes, it is. Just as much as it is the fault of anyone who brings it up, either intentionally or unintentionally derailing threads with the spam that follows.

To correct Tetris, a discussion about what happened is not going to take place, neither in a thread Bebita makes, nor in a thread Tetrismonkey makes, nor in a thread Earendil makes. The situation is such, that any reference to the incident with the intention of 'reminding us all how bad this-and-that is' will be awarded a warning for inciting a riot, should such a riot be the feasible consequence of their actions.

In other words; break the rules, and you will be warned. No exceptions.
Inciting a riot against a person by referring to issues regarding the person out of context (i.e. off-topic) is considered personal abuse and will receive a warning.