Attack/Defense planets, a bug or a "feature"?

[Neimenljivi]

Tetrismonkey that would help but would not fix it entirely.
For instance, a 2tril defense is already hard to be massed. This is the defense on a planet you can see, while you can easily have more than 3tril defenses on platforms which you cannot see thus it makes it very risky and as impossible to mass as Blahh's planets were, even more impossible imho.
Besides it still takes A LOT less resources to buy an unmassable defense combined with platforms on one planet than on 10 without any platforms. Which means if the planets like Blahh used them were bugged (as some whined they were and they got "fixed") then I really, REALLY, see no reason how these planets are not bugged.

~N

[Sarevok]

Tetrismonkey that would help but would not fix it entirely.
For instance, a 2tril defense is already hard to be massed. This is the defense on a planet you can see, while you can easily have more than 3tril defenses on platforms which you cannot see thus it makes it very risky and as impossible to mass as Blahh's planets were, even more impossible imho.
Besides it still takes A LOT less resources to buy an unmassable defense combined with platforms on one planet than on 10 without any platforms. Which means if the planets like Blahh used them were bugged (as some whined they were and they got "fixed") then I really, REALLY, see no reason how these planets are not bugged.

~N

That's a good idea.
Merlin 1 attack planet with say +300b attack
Have another 300b+ attack planet, with 1.8T planet defense, and 1.8T platform defense, and the rest useless attack planets
Then build a 200b attack force and let the fun begin, with a 800b effective attack power

[knight]

I like how people whine about a game feature they don't understand.


Topic for next whine thread: How ascended blessings are unfair.

[RepliMagni]

I like how people whine about a game feature they don't understand.

I like how people post sarcastic spam rather than address the issue

[Legendary Apophis]

I like how people whine about a game feature they don't understand.


Topic for next whine thread: How ascended blessings are unfair.

Post count+1 for you is only achieved thing with your post.

There has over the last few years been something of a moral outrage against Educating, against random massing, against ME chasing:- part of the reason all of these things take place is because of attack planets.

At the moment, I can get 6 times my raw strike by using attack planets.....and because power gets redistributed, I can have it through a couple of very big attack planets which are untouchable, and a load of lesser planets....

Exactly

It's funny how the people that used to whine about Blahh's planets and Caspian's planets are the same that are now against making planets less effective Me wonders how to connect all the dots from players associated with this

Fact A: Blahh spent a lot more naq to get his planets to where they were, alliance feeding or not, a lot more naq was spent on them

Fact B: The planets couldn't be stolen AT A HIGH COST TO PLANET'S OWNER

Fact C: The planets are as effective as they were in Blahh's case now, maybe a bit more

Fact D: The player who now has one or two planets with high stats and the rest of the planets are crappy doesn't need to spent nowhere near enough naq as Blahh needed to spend in order to not get them stolen

Fact E: With a use of 2x PPT + 1 MPDSD on Market it costs you just about nothing to maintain one planet forever with NO POSSIBLE WAY one could steal it, unless you make a mistake of course

Fact F: The second & / third planet with massive stats can be made untouchable with a lot less resources needed than before.

Hm some are right, I really fail to see how things are worse now than they were before

~N

[Andariel]

solution is simple.
steal the small planets...
they can take back one per day and so what? its gone again already.
this just requires a little more work.