RepliMagni wrote:deni wrote:That's the case in the Euclidean space ... it has 3 dimensions and it is the space we live in.
There are other spaces as well, depending on the concepts behind them. While some of them are physical (for example the string theory uses 10 dimensional space and implies that we do not live in 3 but in 10 dimensions), others are purely mathematical concepts (for example the Hausdorff-dimensions) and thus independent from the simple 3D space we live in.
*disclaimer: forgive my complete ignorance:
10 dimensions? How far is that an abstract concept that has not and cannot be proven? Or is there physical proof that more dimensions exist other than simple three dimensions and a time dimension?
mathematicians and physicists have produced a number of theories about mulitple dimensions. a common thread among them seems to be that there are our 3 large dimensions (x,y,z), time as the 4th, and an additional 6 dimensions on top of that. They argue that since we live in a 3 dimensional world, it's hard to visualize a world with more dimensions. If taken from a purely mathematical point of view, its easier to understand.
According to my professor, there has actually been some evidence of the existence of multiple dimensions. A cosmic ray landed in Utah with 6 times the amount of energy it should have. Cosmic rays are supposed to scatter photons to get their energy underneath the GZK bound, .5 x10^20 eV. This ray landed with 6x the energy, 3.2x10^20eV. No other possible sources of cosmic rays were detected from where it came. My professor theorizes with 6x the energy and no other possible source of cosmic rays, the cosmic ray that landed in Utah might have come from a different dimension




[/url]








