1 AT, war is over fix it

[moses]

1 ats are the only way a smaller ms can even compete though

[Duderanch]

1 ats are the only way a smaller ms can even compete though

Huh? Someone needs to learn you how to mass boy!

[moses]

lol my ms vs yours me 1 atting or 5 or 15 atting which one in the long run will be more cost affective for me and well yeah not blow up my own ms on yours

[Buddha]

Lol actually i would say the biggest issue is the amount of turns and how easy it is to get turns.

If there was less turns and harder to get turns then wars might not last for years and someone wouldn't just mass entire alliances JUST because they can.

Or we could start adjusting the amount of turns to do to do the different things.

If we make it 5 turns minimum before MS joins the attack then it should be so for both sides.

[GeneralChaos]

Give it another week and ull see AT's starting to run low on the market, with only 16 available after admins update, once that supply runs dry, things will change.

[Buddha]

Give it another week and ull see AT's starting to run low on the market, with only 16 available after admins update, once that supply runs dry, things will change.

Yeh i hope so

[moses]

It allready has changed past few weeks, the sellers are cut down to maby 1/3rd of what u usualy see allready

[Buddha]

It allready has changed past few weeks, the sellers are cut down to maby 1/3rd of what u usualy see allready

Sounds better and better maybe soon the stupid wars stop, the massing for no reason beside because you can.

Start sounding more intresting already,

[Lithium]

keep it in mind limiting at's wont ever stop massing. it might stop one to mass 10 members but a single one.

[Buddha]

keep it in mind limiting at's wont ever stop massing. it might stop one to mass 10 members but a single one.

Lith i have no intrest in stop massing.

I have a intrest to stop the never ending wars and the fact that people and alliance mass just because they can and because turns are so easy to get that it means you don't have to think twice before doing anything.

[Lithium]

that leads to another concern Nim. a non ending war or a long war is supported by alliance players. if u ve 40 members and 30 are willing to support then u get enough turns to do the job

at's have been limited to direct the cash flow to game market, that all. we mortals that dont use will become less active.

im already going down to inactivity, thnx to new mini update , hope smone buys my sweet account

[Desert Ghost]

+++1 vote
agree, but aint see it hapaning.

DG

[Buddha]

that leads to another concern Nim. a non ending war or a long war is supported by alliance players. if u ve 40 members and 30 are willing to support then u get enough turns to do the job

at's have been limited to direct the cash flow to game market, that all. we mortals that dont use will become less active.

im already going down to inactivity, thnx to new mini update , hope smone buys my sweet account

Still depends how turns are getting around.

[Sarevok]

that leads to another concern Nim. a non ending war or a long war is supported by alliance players. if u ve 40 members and 30 are willing to support then u get enough turns to do the job

at's have been limited to direct the cash flow to game market, that all. we mortals that dont use will become less active.

im already going down to inactivity, thnx to new mini update , hope smone buys my sweet account

Still depends how turns are getting around.

Well what will actually happen, is those in larger alliances, have people whom spend money on the game, cause it's a hobby. Those people don't need to buy from the player market, and can support their alliance, better then an alliance whom don't spend.

[Dubby_CompGamerGeek2]

I agree it should be fixed...

however only such that both motherships act the same...

either both take 1/15 of the damage they would take on a full 15-Turn attack,

or both take 1/5,

or both take 15/15... (full 15-Turn damage)

etc.

That way the game leaves the possibility of some element of strategy, with good choices between the amount of turns used per attack,
for various valid military reasons...

without the bug of the attacker's mothership taking virtually no losses...

even though my account would generally be on the losing end of most mothership battles because of it's crummy stats,
I think it's best for the game in this case that only the strong bias toward the attacking mothership be fixed...




One player in particular **regularly** checks my defense and/or my Units out with a 1-Turn hit...

...three times this week, plus twice by their friend...

This costs 1/4 of my day's income to repair just my mothership,
and that's before they take my naq in a regular 15-Turn attack,
costing another 1/4 of my daily income in MS repairs,
plus I have then lost the other half of my daily income, as it's now in their bank.

I know Jason would love for me to start a suicidal war with people several times my size,
but I kept my composure and I will be looking to resolve the issue peacefully...


General Chaos, who is the best diplomat in your empire?

Heck, I'll even keep you guys and gals posted on what my defense is...
Hint: you can barely buy a single can of American soda pop with it...