(suggestion) Era Alliance Winner..

[HippyFool]

The winning alliance should go on AVERAGE power rather than TOTAL power. This would bring back some strategy to alliance ranking rather than just hording every player possible and making them get half decent AC lvls.

That is all.

[Apogryph]

The winning alliance should go on AVERAGE power rather than TOTAL power. This would bring back some strategy to alliance ranking rather than just hording every player possible and making them get half decent AC lvls.

That is all.

2nded

[martin the great]

i agree
as does my army of slaves

[renegadze]

Would this not be massively one sided for really small alliance though? say 1-2 players? as they could have really good stats, making their average high.

Before I was massed earlier I would have probably been rank 1 "alliance" if I was on my own.

or base it on player rank

currently 2000 or so people registered?

rank 1 gives 2000 points at the end
rank 2 gives 1999 points and so on

that way you could have less members, but could have better ranks

and maybe have it that only your best 10 alliance members scores count.

[martin the great]

then anyone with less would have a lower rank
crazy chickens only had 4 members last round

why not base it on average power and total power

[[BoT] Jason]

screw the power. anyone can AC snipe the end

base it on average rank.....

[HippyFool]

Would this not be massively one sided for really small alliance though? say 1-2 players? as they could have really good stats, making their average high.

Before I was massed earlier I would have probably been rank 1 "alliance" if I was on my own.

or base it on player rank

currently 2000 or so people registered?

rank 1 gives 2000 points at the end
rank 2 gives 1999 points and so on

that way you could have less members, but could have better ranks

and maybe have it that only your best 10 alliance members scores count.

Ah yes you have certainly found a flaw in my idea... If the person with the highest power at the end makes an alliance with themselves in it, they will win....that would be a bit silly lol.

How about top average power... but with a minimum of 5 players? that way you need all of your players to be good, and the alliances with like 30 people might reconsider having inactive players in them...

[jabujabu]

How about top average power... but with a minimum of 5 players? that way you need all of your players to be good, and the alliances with like 30 people might reconsider having inactive players in them...

like how it was supposed to be, but alliances with 3 people still register power