Re My thread in the GC currently titles FS-v-DDE
I requested this thread that I started be closed, it was closed, then reopened by Deni.
I changed the title of the same thread to reflect the way it had gone off topic. Today I see the title has been changed back, and my 1st post has been locked to prevent me changing the title again.
I thought this was the SGW forum, not the DDE forum, so my questions are these
1) Why am I being prevented from changing the title of my own thread ?
2) Why am I not allowed to close my own thread ?
3) Why are DDE Mods allowed to tamper with threads that they have a personal interest in ?
If anyone wants the unedited truth, visit a truly free forum www.forgotten-serenity.com
Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
- MEZZANINE
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4453
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:39 am
- Alliance: Forgotten Serenity
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 81691
- Location: CARDIFF
Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?



Spoiler
Attack Mercs Killed (30) 459,329,001
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 2,918,478,517
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 12,677,958
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 226,236,488
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 490,627,262
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 4,131,482,551
Spies Killed(50) 4,256,505,842
Spy Killers Killed(50) 651,022,448
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 35,583,034
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 39,498,511
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 2,413,254
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 358,539
Planets Taken(5000) 411
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 2,355,738,435,154,805
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 5,943,886,456
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 74,293,522,376,607
Attack Turns Used(1) 1,731,971
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 2,918,478,517
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 12,677,958
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 226,236,488
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 490,627,262
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 4,131,482,551
Spies Killed(50) 4,256,505,842
Spy Killers Killed(50) 651,022,448
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 35,583,034
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 39,498,511
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 2,413,254
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 358,539
Planets Taken(5000) 411
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 2,355,738,435,154,805
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 5,943,886,456
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 74,293,522,376,607
Attack Turns Used(1) 1,731,971
-
RoKeT
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:03 am
- Race: The King Jaffa
- Location: New York
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
Ex Mod
Looking for an Account?
21 Accounts sold to Date
Looking for an Account?
Spoiler
I can find you one...
Spoiler
Very trusted Trader
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
-
RoKeT
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:03 am
- Race: The King Jaffa
- Location: New York
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
If there were like 3 server war threads, why couldn't if FS closed down theres why couldn't DDE just make our own anyways?
Ex Mod
Looking for an Account?
21 Accounts sold to Date
Looking for an Account?
Spoiler
I can find you one...
Spoiler
Very trusted Trader
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
- MEZZANINE
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4453
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:39 am
- Alliance: Forgotten Serenity
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 81691
- Location: CARDIFF
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
Earendil wrote:I didn't know that DR is a DDE mod, nor is sara or SS. Deni is form DDE and is a mod, but she is not a DDE Mod.
As i've told Papa, a thread MAY be locked upon the wishes of it's creator but also, a thread may not be if the owner wants it locked within mid arguement to keep the other party from having their say.
So why has my thread title been changed, and my 1st post locked to prevent me changing my thread title ?
Deni again misusing Mod powers to for her personal and alliance reasons, this is from my 1st post where she has edited the title of my thread.
Last edited by deni on Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:20 am, edited 5 times in total.
title change
ps you dont have to be in DDE to be in DDEs pocket, when it comes to modding issues, Deni wants, Deni gets.



Spoiler
Attack Mercs Killed (30) 459,329,001
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 2,918,478,517
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 12,677,958
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 226,236,488
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 490,627,262
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 4,131,482,551
Spies Killed(50) 4,256,505,842
Spy Killers Killed(50) 651,022,448
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 35,583,034
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 39,498,511
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 2,413,254
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 358,539
Planets Taken(5000) 411
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 2,355,738,435,154,805
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 5,943,886,456
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 74,293,522,376,607
Attack Turns Used(1) 1,731,971
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 2,918,478,517
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 12,677,958
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 226,236,488
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 490,627,262
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 4,131,482,551
Spies Killed(50) 4,256,505,842
Spy Killers Killed(50) 651,022,448
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 35,583,034
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 39,498,511
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 2,413,254
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 358,539
Planets Taken(5000) 411
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 2,355,738,435,154,805
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 5,943,886,456
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 74,293,522,376,607
Attack Turns Used(1) 1,731,971
- Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
MEZZANINE wrote:1) Why am I being prevented from changing the title of my own thread ?
I'm surprised that such thing can be done..
That's quite disturbing.

Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
- deni
- The Initiate
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:18 am
- Alliance: THE DARK DOMINIUM
- Race: Goddess
- ID: 75493
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
MEZZANINE wrote:Re My thread in the GC currently titles FS-v-DDE
I requested this thread that I started be closed, it was closed, then reopened by Deni.
I changed the title of the same thread to reflect the way it had gone off topic. Today I see the title has been changed back, and my 1st post has been locked to prevent me changing the title again.
I thought this was the SGW forum, not the DDE forum, so my questions are these
1) Why am I being prevented from changing the title of my own thread ?
2) Why am I not allowed to close my own thread ?
3) Why are DDE Mods allowed to tamper with threads that they have a personal interest in ?
If anyone wants the unedited truth, visit a truly free forum http://www.forgotten-serenity.com
Anything else I did? Start WWII maybe?
I know FS sees me as the personified evil. I cannot change that nor do I really want to as it usually very amusing.
I will try to give you an answer anyways although I am getting tired of answering the same questions over and over again.
1. The FS vs DDE war topic was locked by Duderanch and re-opened by him after consultation with the entire forum staff.
2. Even you did start the topic, this does not mean that it is your "own" topic. Whatever is posted on the forum does not "belong" to the user but to the forum. A forum the mods are supposed to take care of.
3. Anyone can request that a topic is closed. If that request is met, is up to the moderators.
The cases in which a topic is closed are summarized in the forum rules.
4. The author of a topic has the privilege to determine/change the title of the thread. Nevertheless, the title should reflect the subject of the topic and the focal point of the discussion.
The thread was named "DDE vs FS" for almost 6 months. You decided to rename it to 'Propaganda Flaming Spamathon waste of time thread". I renamed it back to what it was as the new title did not describe the subject of the thread.
The opening posts was locked to prevent further editing as I wanted to prevent the ping pong renaming of the thread that would have followed.
MEZZANINE wrote:ps you dont have to be in DDE to be in DDEs pocket, when it comes to modding issues, Deni wants, Deni gets.
It's good to be me

If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you're up to
- papa~smurf
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:00 pm
- Alliance: fool killer
- Race: human
- ID: 0
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
honestly now
this is 2 threads about the same topic
but that is the thrid name honestly
1
FS vs our dull dreary enemies
2
FS vs dde
now its
3 dde vs fs
if any thing it should go back to the original because:
it should not have been alowed to be changed it the first place
and it is clearly a "FS" thread. not DDE thread (ownership being set by allaince of originator and number of times FS has been used as the first participant.
however, the fact remains
originator was allowed to change name once, from an none suspect to a suspect topic, he should have the right to return it to what originator see's it as.
i would ask a mod to combine this with ombus thread as it now breaks 2 thread rule
this is 2 threads about the same topic
but that is the thrid name honestly
1
FS vs our dull dreary enemies
2
FS vs dde
now its
3 dde vs fs
if any thing it should go back to the original because:
it should not have been alowed to be changed it the first place
and it is clearly a "FS" thread. not DDE thread (ownership being set by allaince of originator and number of times FS has been used as the first participant.
however, the fact remains
originator was allowed to change name once, from an none suspect to a suspect topic, he should have the right to return it to what originator see's it as.
i would ask a mod to combine this with ombus thread as it now breaks 2 thread rule

Easy^ Rocks
- Almost38
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:12 pm
- Alliance: I am in your base
- Race: killing your d00ds
- ID: 0
- Location: running chicago's underground
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
zebism is the way of the furutre!
Spoiler
Rules of SGW
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
- papa~smurf
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:00 pm
- Alliance: fool killer
- Race: human
- ID: 0
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
Earendil wrote:As i've told Papa, a thread MAY be locked upon the wishes of it's creator but also, a thread may not be if the owner wants it locked within mid arguement to keep the other party from having their say.
sorry for double post, but they had there "say"
what they where waiting for was a reply (which they could or could not get many different ways, pm being frequently used by the forum)
our reply was to close and lock the thread

Easy^ Rocks
- deni
- The Initiate
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:18 am
- Alliance: THE DARK DOMINIUM
- Race: Goddess
- ID: 75493
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
Almost38 wrote::lol: spam? what about almost every post bebita make is either insult or spam but what been done about that NOTHING and yes ive reported his post
Did I handle the reports?
Or is the whole mod team biased against FS?

If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you're up to
- Almost38
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:12 pm
- Alliance: I am in your base
- Race: killing your d00ds
- ID: 0
- Location: running chicago's underground
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
the reports were never hyandled from what i can tell
zebism is the way of the furutre!
Spoiler
Rules of SGW
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
- deni
- The Initiate
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:18 am
- Alliance: THE DARK DOMINIUM
- Race: Goddess
- ID: 75493
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
Almost38 wrote:the reports were never hyandled from what i can tell
They were closed so I guess someone handled them and decided that no action was needed to be taken.

If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you're up to
- Almost38
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:12 pm
- Alliance: I am in your base
- Race: killing your d00ds
- ID: 0
- Location: running chicago's underground
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
shouldnt i be informed i belive i asked to be in it?
zebism is the way of the furutre!
Spoiler
Rules of SGW
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
-
RoKeT
- Forum Zombie
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:03 am
- Race: The King Jaffa
- Location: New York
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
Okay this is ridiculous guys and girls, there are two topics about this and it's not getting anywhere so here is what is going to happen i'll bet 50 dollars!
Ready
and here we go
Nothing!
it will stay, topic will stay named the same, and nothing will be done,
let me say this
i do not agree that that is what should happen, but this is what is going to happen, why because we don't have a good system envoked right now, right now we have
Mods- Walk all over and do what they want
Admins- Pretty much Gods, you can't over turn anything no matter how severe
Ombudsman- a public puppet that just makes it look like we have a choice
Users- Pretty much no say what so ever
SO AGAIN i repeat if you don't like the way things are going MAYBE it's time for change!
and i don't mean just me, but lets do it, lets do new ideas, lets throw out this system that isn't working, and lets work TOGETHER and make a system that makes all happy!
Ready
and here we go
Nothing!
it will stay, topic will stay named the same, and nothing will be done,
let me say this
i do not agree that that is what should happen, but this is what is going to happen, why because we don't have a good system envoked right now, right now we have
Mods- Walk all over and do what they want
Admins- Pretty much Gods, you can't over turn anything no matter how severe
Ombudsman- a public puppet that just makes it look like we have a choice
Users- Pretty much no say what so ever
SO AGAIN i repeat if you don't like the way things are going MAYBE it's time for change!
and i don't mean just me, but lets do it, lets do new ideas, lets throw out this system that isn't working, and lets work TOGETHER and make a system that makes all happy!
Ex Mod
Looking for an Account?
21 Accounts sold to Date
Looking for an Account?
Spoiler
I can find you one...
Spoiler
Very trusted Trader
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=149077
- Sholva
- Forum Irregular
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:48 pm
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 0
- Alternate name(s): Teh Punisher
- Location: Southampton, UK
Re: Bias Mods - How can you justify this ?
agreed maybe mods who dont have any bias or atleast minimum or maybe mods cannot tamper or touch topics that have their alliance involved in it
my 2 cents
my 2 cents


zeb says:
pets at hoe?
zeb says:
ZOMG YOUR AN ANIMAL RAPIST
YOU SELL ANIMAL SEX
