Inactive players

Artiglio
Forum Regular
Posts: 618
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:59 pm
ID: 0
Location: Replicating

444 :shock: dam i still think it should have stayed at top 100 who could ascend :evil:
Image
liam óg
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:12 pm

well top 444 and if your only getting 1 point per turn you do have to stay there for about 20 days
Image
Artiglio
Forum Regular
Posts: 618
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:59 pm
ID: 0
Location: Replicating

staying top 100 for 20 days is still better :roll:
Image
Vendar
Forum Grunt
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:40 pm
ID: 0
Location: 2. PsjK/KymJP/KarPr

I dont think so. I like the current. Otherwise I could propably never ascend.. ANd I now have about 500 G&R and I'm ranked 350'ish
Image
User avatar
schuesseled
Forum Expert
Posts: 1013
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:05 pm
ID: 33241

i have an idea all the inactive players (havent signed on for 2 months), should have their accounts deleted and all their resources naq,uu,turns should be shared out equally among everyone else. This would be a great solution, except none should be given to scammers and amit :D
12agnar0k be taking over this here account, argh!

Image
undead21
Fledgling Forumer
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:03 pm
ID: 0

well i would agree with the deleteing after a certin amt of time but how about 3 months becasue it is possale that somone must leave on a extened period of time such as military service or what ever may pulll them away from civilisation. and i wold have to dissagree with shareing the deleted resorces

who likes my sig, its beautiful aint it?
ImageImageImage
Huxley
Forum Elder
Posts: 2181
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:17 pm
ID: 0
Location: England / Australia

just stay top 100 for like 2 months then be living god
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”