To have Raid option or not??

Lord Dougy · Sat May 07, 2005 8:05 am

well there are so many opinions flying about, i think its time to choose whether to keep it or not.

IcER · Sat May 07, 2005 8:30 am

The raiding is good, just needs a little adjustment. It *could* be moved to covert, but maybe it should just be tweaked. Cant get everything right first time.

Sat May 07, 2005 9:39 am

Must disagree - I am usually a big fan of Forum's work, but this RAID update is absolutely ridiculous!

It unbalances the races and upsets all the hard work that has been put in to balance them.

Sorry Forum, but I've been going through the forum boards all day, and the majority of opinion is that this one is a bit of a stinker!!

I say scrap the RAID option altogether!

Saturnine · Sat May 07, 2005 9:40 am

IcER wrote:The raiding is good, just needs a little adjustment. It *could* be moved to covert, but maybe it should just be tweaked. Cant get everything right first time.

Yeah, Like the ability to steal more units! What I'm getting aint worth 15 turns. Covert turns, now I could throw those away and be happy.

Sat May 07, 2005 9:53 am

lord saturnine wrote:
IcER wrote:The raiding is good, just needs a little adjustment. It *could* be moved to covert, but maybe it should just be tweaked. Cant get everything right first time.

Yeah, Like the ability to steal more units! What I'm getting aint worth 15 turns. Covert turns, now I could throw those away and be happy.

I agree that covert would probably be a better place for it if it does stay (although I hope it doesn't!) as it would also mean that RAID attacks would be more limited as cuvert turns a limited to a maximum of 50.

Lindstorm · Sat May 07, 2005 10:10 am

OK I agree this raid think is BAD. WHY. I'll tell you why. All that it did was that it gave all the power to those who are in top 50 or so. They have ability to stole all the units witch are gathering naq or were ment to be traind. Come on what are you going to do next, give the top rankings ability to steal turn ??? THAT IS NOT RIGHT. Ban me if you want but at least few of people will see what I mean, and if they have any brains (don't want to insoult anybody) they will see that this is wrong. I know at least 25 people who stop playing stargate wars because of raid. Oh and don't forget newmwmbers. how will they be able to play if some guy will steal all of their units, I'll tell you how THEY WON'T that's how. So what's the purpes of the game if only 50 people who have monopol over others play. Oh yeah there isn't any. My personal opinion is to delete raid and forgot it has ever existed and if must be cept move it to the covert area so that there will be little more posibilitys to defend against them. Oh and covert had very big meaning while there was no raid and naw it's usless. SO IF ANY OF YOU STEAL WANTS TO PLAY THIS GAME AND HAVE THE ABILITY TO SUCCED VOTE AGAINST RAID OR ATLEAST PUT IT IN THE COVERT. :evil:

PS: I appoligize for any insaults and mostly because my english is not so good. But I hope you all got the point. Thank you. :evil:

I Replicate · Sat May 07, 2005 10:23 am

*wishes I had mod powers in this board to remove insults*

Okay, first of all, yelling and talking like the will not change anything

Second, I am sure that Forum is considering changing it, or at least giving us some information about it and a reason why he made it this way. Either way, just wait a little bit for an answer.

Also, this really doesnt advantage the top players too much since there is the rank modifyer interferring with them taking too many units.

~I Replicate
asking everyone to chill out

Brigon · Sat May 07, 2005 10:25 am

turns spent raiding means turns not spent attacking
it is far more profitable to attack then to raid

and as one of my high school english teachers used to say

"cursing is a sign of a poverty striken mind."

Lindstorm · Sat May 07, 2005 10:31 am

I Replicate wrote:*wishes I had mod powers in this board to remove insults*

Okay, first of all, yelling and talking like the will not change anything

Second, I am sure that Forum is considering changing it, or at least giving us some information about it and a reason why he made it this way. Either way, just wait a little bit for an answer.

Also, this really doesnt advantage the top players too much since there is the rank modifyer interferring with them taking too many units.

~Jaxin
asking everyone to chill out

Oh you say they won't steal to many units. hmmm yeah you're wrong!! One of my friend you may see his name before forgive_me, lost 4k of untraind soldiers to someone in top 10 (he didn't tll who) and he was ranked below 3000 .

Brigon · Sat May 07, 2005 10:34 am

forgive me didnt belong at that low of a rank

I Replicate · Sat May 07, 2005 10:36 am

Forgive me was ranked in the 1400s AFTER the attacks against him. He was no where near the 3000s.

Lindstorm · Sat May 07, 2005 10:38 am

brigon wrote:*turns spent raiding means turns not spent attacking
it is far more profitable to attack then to raid

and as one of my high school english teachers used to say

"cursing is a sign of a poverty striken mind."

Firs I hate all teachers so i don't raly care what would they say, again I apoligize for the insaults I deleted them all I think. And as you have said attacking is more profitable yes it is if you are looking short turn. With 15 attack turns you will steal abaut 1.7 million naq. But 4k untraid units will gave that money in abaut two wiks and from then on you will have much more profit from them than the naq that you have stolen before :wink:

Brigon · Sat May 07, 2005 10:38 am

like i said he didnt belong that low...

its nice how people give the updates a chance thou dont you think :roll:

yes but im guessing it took alot more then 15 attack turns to get 4k troops
the best i got was 49 with 15

C Carter · Sat May 07, 2005 10:49 am

Lindstorm wrote:
I Replicate wrote:*wishes I had mod powers in this board to remove insults*

Okay, first of all, yelling and talking like the will not change anything

Second, I am sure that Forum is considering changing it, or at least giving us some information about it and a reason why he made it this way. Either way, just wait a little bit for an answer.

Also, this really doesnt advantage the top players too much since there is the rank modifyer interferring with them taking too many units.

~Jaxin
asking everyone to chill out

Oh you say they won't steal to many units. hmmm yeah you're wrong!! One of my friend you may see his name before forgive_me, lost 4k of untraind soldiers to someone in top 10 (he didn't tll who) and he was ranked below 3000 .

i kno forgive me to he was rank around 1.500 he did lose 4k units but they attacked him 10 times sense he has one of the most amount of units but....im not saying any more

Lindstorm · Sat May 07, 2005 10:55 am

Forgive_me wrote:*i think its the bigest **** it coud hapen....im rank 3000 and i wass attack by rank 6 and lost 4k units...so **** this game...good luck all...

I cleared out the language but those were his words.
But I must say that i didn't look at his rank so I apoligize again if I spread wrong information but still I don't like this raid think atleast not under the attack turns.

To have Raid option or not??

should we have the raid option for attack?

To have Raid option or not??

Honours and Awards

Honours and Awards

Login