[KMA]Avenger wrote:what right does any invading army have to take over ANY world heritage site?
i thought we were supposed to be "civilised" and yet, they have acted just like an ancient conquering army, sacking towns, city's and whole country's, looting and butchering everyone. 1.6 million dead Iraq's since the start of the war (and who knows how many have been subjected to torture?!) and now they damage ancient sites...no damned respect!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 461755.stm
![]()
![]()
This war wasn't needed unlike Afghan war. It was just because of US Army's/Bush's dislike of Sadam and hurt pride due to his behaviour prior to the war, not to mention the need for Junior to finish what dad started in 1991 lol. So the losses will likely be higher, and least justify-able.
That was sadly expectable if they install a basement. Not all soldiers realize what it is and some don't give a damn.
However, Brdavs, as much as I see this irony, it's not -yet- really the same. It has similarities indeed. But talibans bombed willingly this buddha. Americans deteriorate this site in long term, which isn't acceptable either, but the way and purpose is different.
It's damaging due to sitting troops ignorance, while for talibans, it was bombing due to ignorance. I'm sure soldiers don't try to damage it knowingly due to some silly ideology, unlike those idiotic talibans. If these soldiers damage it consciously, then shame on them!
It's as silly as those millionaires/billionaires acquiring old houses/buildings of great historical and money value and butchering them for their needs not minding what damages could be done (ie: creation of a jacuzzi inside the house).









[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]

