I'll use the term to encompass both medicinal value (eradication of disease etc) and cosmetic.
In Australia and the UK, it is illegal to allow parents to choose the sex of their baby, yet in the US it isn't.
Discuss



Malx wrote:Make kids not cancer!

[/spoiler] In any case.. it strikes me as though dear Sylus is connecting two different developments. 
Juliette wrote:OMG I'd LOVE a Prada baby.
Just imagine what our contemporary designers can do. A baby with a skin tone that matches your purse so you can carry it around in it..










Ragnvald wrote:when it comes to the eradication of a genetic disease i believe that it to be a benifit to the child so in that instance yes i believe it ok to intervien. however when it comes to the decision of chaging the sex of a child i belive it to be wrong. It isnt thats difficult to change the sex of a unborn. however were would it stop. With the use of genetic intervention it is possible in theory to change hair colour, eye colour and various there aspects of an unborn child.
So being an individual becomes squed because you are designed to be somthing you wernt supposed to be.
Thats jsut my feelings on it



There's no accounting for taste.. that goes for me too.Nitro S wrote:Besides, who would want a kid that wouldn`t look anything like you just because you choosed to give it green hair and red eyes???![]()

