Jun29th update BUGS

[CABAL]

Isn't anyone the slightest concerned about the fact that new users cannot register?

Someone get admin to add in an apostrophe to the query.

Resorting to creating multis now?

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=169690

And no, why would I even consider having multiple accounts if I can't even be bother playing with one account?

[MartinDraganov]

my income got bugged.

INCOME:

You have 183,210 untrained units; 124,839,362 miners ; 116,906,692 lifers.
You get 20 naq per untrained unit. And 80 per miner/lifer.

Your starting income is therefore (183,210 x 20) + (241,746,054 x 80)
Your starting income is: 19,343,348,520
x 1.01 for ad displays = 19,536,782,005
x race bonus of 1.4300 = 27,937,598,267
x 1.1 for no commander = 30,731,358,094
Planet If I Set You At War adds 1,122,744,000 = 31,854,102,094
x 0.70 due to officer rate of 30 = 22,297,871,466
x 1.00 for def con set at: 0 = 22,297,871,466
GRAND TOTAL PER TURN: 22,297,871,465

and i dont have any officers...

[Sir Phoenix Knight]

Another bug or just another change maybe but ME total has changed again..

after the update my ME total dropped to 110 bill now it is 97 bill Total and i was just massed so it would have jumped a few

so around about a 15 bill drop from what it was this morning..

Unfortunately, admin listened to these two idiots...

I would agree with a value in the middle of .00001 as being fair common ground. Everyone knows especially now UU raided should be lowered also to maybe 10 each.

the old value for naq stolen .0001 was okay, it meant 1Q to 1b UU which is okay, but id like to see it down a notch and i agree with *that guy* that said before .00001 middle ground seems reasonable

Instead of listening to reason...

I actuallly disagree with changing the values and I'll tell you why.
.0001 per naq stolen
100 per UU raided
Those values allowed for raiders and farmers to also compete for the higher ME ranks. Therefore in order to have the top ranks, you didn't only have to be a warrior. It allowed more flexibility in playing style. Most of the top 20 ranks were your aggressive players and massers, but around rank 20.. you had BillusBallus who is one of the top raiders in the game. I was also around that rank and I'm known for my farming. If you change either of those values, you are saying that the only way to have the most ME is if you play one style of game.

I agree but when the update happen it was 0.000001.. so my ME should have gone up since i am mostly a naq farmer and that is it.. i was on 420 bill ME before the update
so take half from the doubling effect which means it was really only 210 bill total ME..
But after the first roll over of the new updates it went down to 110 bill which is when that naq was rated at 1.0E-6 now it is 1.0E-5..
so there for my ME should have gone up not down by 15 bill.. to 95 bill total ME...

But i do believe out of all the updates the change to ME Naq and UU stolen is the only thing that should have never been changed in the first place...

P.S though i have just noticed that you down graded UU even more from 100 to 10 points so basically raiding gets you nothing you would have to steal 100 Mill UU to get 1 Billion ME...

[Buddha]

No sure if it was posted i might missed it when going true the 17 pages:

Jul 02, 03:15 ~Doc Savage~ 55,484,435,699 Naquadah stolen 0 26,346 36,905 XXX XXX details
Jul 02, 00:34 ~Doc Savage~ 52,142,924,450 Naquadah stolen 0 51,410 37,693 XXX XXX details

He won and get my NAQ with 0 turns?

My income is bugged:

INCOME:

You have 101,615 untrained units; 28,869,124 miners ; 127,771,104 lifers.
You get 20 naq per untrained unit. And 80 per miner/lifer.

Your starting income is therefore (101,615 x 20) + (156,640,228 x 80)
Your starting income is: 12,533,250,540
x 1.01 for ad displays = 12,658,583,045
x race bonus of 1.4100 = 17,848,602,094
x 1.1 for no commander = 19,633,462,303
Planet adds 1,036,160,000 = 20,669,622,303
x 1.00 for def con set at: 0 = 20,669,622,303
GRAND TOTAL PER TURN: 20,669,622,303


of course, deduct your 1% alliance dues too ...
OTHER:

Turn income i get: 20,462,926,080 Naquadah (in 9 minutes)

My own calcs claim i should get 20.473.xxx.xxx cant remember the last.

[Clarkey]

my income got bugged.

INCOME:

You have 183,210 untrained units; 124,839,362 miners ; 116,906,692 lifers.
You get 20 naq per untrained unit. And 80 per miner/lifer.

Your starting income is therefore (183,210 x 20) + (241,746,054 x 80)
Your starting income is: 19,343,348,520
x 1.01 for ad displays = 19,536,782,005
x race bonus of 1.4300 = 27,937,598,267
x 1.1 for no commander = 30,731,358,094
Planet If I Set You At War adds 1,122,744,000 = 31,854,102,094
x 0.70 due to officer rate of 30 = 22,297,871,466
x 1.00 for def con set at: 0 = 22,297,871,466
GRAND TOTAL PER TURN: 22,297,871,465

and i dont have any officers...

*sigh*

Make yourself your own CO, then kick yourself.

[MartinDraganov]

thanks clarkey

[Dubby_CompGamerGeek2]

I've heard of people getting bank sizes upwards of 500 Trillion...

A friend in Reaper's Bane told me that he had a 600 Trillion Bank Size.

He said some of his mates and friends had bank sizes over 1 Quad.


He also said that Reaper's Bane's alliance bank had dropped dramatically...

like from many trillions of naq down to 2k naq.

He doesn't post here much, so I though that I should.

[Child of the wolf]

I've heard of people getting bank sizes upwards of 500 Trillion...

A friend in Reaper's Bane told me that he had a 600 Trillion Bank Size.

He said some of his mates and friends had bank sizes over 1 Quad.


He also said that Reaper's Bane's alliance bank had dropped dramatically...

like from many trillions of naq down to 2k naq.

He doesn't post here much, so I though that I should.

I don't see how this is a bug; this is a well known alliance bank feature that someone (either the leader or the 2ic) will have done. There is no limit on how many times you can purchase the bank size upgrade (a little wrong if you ask me, but not terribly important).

[stuff of legends]

i heard someone getting upwards of 800 trill because its totally necessary

[Clarkey]

There's been no new registrations for like 4 days now!

JASON!!!

[CABAL]

There's been no new registrations for like 4 days now!

JASON!!!

Isn't anyone the slightest concerned about the fact that new users cannot register?

Someone get admin to add in an apostrophe to the query.

Someone please get him to open up vsys.php.

Find:

Code: Select all

,1'

Replace with:

Code: Select all

,'1'

[Lord Yojimbo]

When i click my allainces house i see the following bug displayed on the top:

Warning: Division by zero on line 219

Warning: Division by zero in on line 219

looks like a incorrect value enterend into the php coding - let me know how it goes

[Forum]

there is no 2nd page.
all are on page 1 -- so not a 'problem' any more

(32nd alliance in house of Ptah(time): heriam justAghost 1,987,826 (2) )
bottom of page 1

fixed.

you cant view the second page of alliances in the house of time, it takes you to the second pages of alliances instead

went through
battlefield > Alliance and House Ranking > Disciples of Ptah (time) > Next>>

it looks as though its viewing alliances by total power

still same problem, sorry

[Forum]

thanks for reporting this one.
i remind myself every time "if you change register page, TEST IT" then i remind myself again when it next breaks
anyway, fixed...
"Your activation password was sent to your e-mail. It should take under 2 minutes to arrive.
Be sure to check your 'junk' or 'spam' folder, as it often gets trapped there.
RETURN TO MAIN PAGE TO LOG ON"

Isn't anyone the slightest concerned about the fact that new users cannot register?

Someone get admin to add in an apostrophe to the query.

[Clarkey]

thanks for reporting this one.
i remind myself every time "if you change register page, TEST IT" then i remind myself again when it next breaks
anyway, fixed...
"Your activation password was sent to your e-mail. It should take under 2 minutes to arrive.
Be sure to check your 'junk' or 'spam' folder, as it often gets trapped there.
RETURN TO MAIN PAGE TO LOG ON"

Isn't anyone the slightest concerned about the fact that new users cannot register?

Someone get admin to add in an apostrophe to the query.

Good stuff, now we can get fresh blood in.

*tests registration page*
*now has 2 accounts*