Ĕɱƿŷ wrote:The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=62&p=2172849#p2172849
"Odd, seems Admins stance differs. viewtopic.php?f=68&t=159134"
Section 4: Spam
a. Topics.
Topics will be considered spam if they fit into one of three categories.
i) They appear in the wrong section of the board.
ii) The poster has made more topics than is reasonable for one user within the day. (For a rough guide most users won’t start more than two topics in a single forum within a day however if they are all of interest and relevant to the forum then there is some flexibility to this rule.)
iii) The topic has already been locked by a moderator and the user has reposted the topic.
Consequence:
Topics in the wrong section will generally be moved to the correct section. Users who post too many topics or repost locked topics will be given one warning point.
b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic. This may include off topic posting or an excessive number of posts that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users.
Consequence:
A polite note from a moderator will be issued requesting the user cut down the amount of irrelevant posts. Repeat offenders will be given one warning point.
----------
Being that you were a Mod and Admin you know the rules... if you have a reply to a Moderator making a post as a Moderator then PM them. It's entirely not appropriate to reply in the topic. You have two previous verbal notes for spamming and no Board Warning after so you know the rule. On a side note you were right.
Ombudsmen, above is a warning I received from Empy.
You will be able to see the posts in the dump i presume.
I posted a reply in a GC thread where i respond to Empy but also was wishing Forgotten Serenity and Killtacular fun in their war.
I do believe that on many other occasions that when people post something on topic but also include something slightly off topic it is not warned for as spam. I've seen this a lot.
I do not believe my post should have been treated as spam.
EDIT:
Section 4: Spam
a. Topics.
Topics will be considered spam if they fit into one of three categories.
i) They appear in the wrong section of the board. It was not in the wrong section as I was mainly wishing the warring parties fun in their war.
ii) The poster has made more topics than is reasonable for one user within the day. (For a rough guide most users won’t start more than two topics in a single forum within a day however if they are all of interest and relevant to the forum then there is some flexibility to this rule.)This has nothing to do with the post.
iii) The topic has already been locked by a moderator and the user has reposted the topic.The topic was not locked and I did not repost it.
b. Replies
Replies will be considered spam if they do not contribute to the discussion of the topic. This may include off topic posting or an excessive number of posts that contain nothing more than emoticons or small words such as ‘lol’. While it is appropriate to indicate something is amusing, drowning out a whole thread with such posts makes it hard to follow for all users.The main point of the reply was clearly on topic.