Minimum Damage Bug?

Locked
Dubby_CompGamerGeek2
Forum Addict
Posts: 3152
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:55 am
Alliance: TÅTS / TÅF
Race: Magnificent
ID: 83588
Alternate name(s): >> Skype: IrishHighlanders <<
Dublin Warrior, Dubby, Dubs, DW, CGG, DCGG2.
Paul, Paulie Boy!, Paulie, PAULIE!!!, PAULIE BOY!!!, Paul James, etc.
Location: USA
Contact:

Minimum Damage Bug?

I thought the defensive action required to do damage was bigger than 1% of my strike,
and I'm surprised that I'm losing troops to these tiny defenses, and that they are bothering to fight... :P


01:20 CW Naquadah stolen 15 2 2 643,276,015,200 31,585,105 details
^^^ it says it killed 2 soldiers, but I only lost a single merc, I guess the other one was badly injured? :smt081

I was smart enough to only send armed soldiers on this one...
I was fearing auto-ban after that for the next 30 minutes after I saw that one... :P



Jan 24, 00:49 Vr Naquadah stolen 15 0 0 978,747,202,660 118,570 details

^^^ This attack by myself, against a tiny defense, with zero dead troops to me, has been the exception lately, rather than the rule... though again, I'm surprised they fought...


Jan 23, 20:01 ly Naquadah stolen 15 106 142 699,862,257,600 2,116,603,210 details


Jan 23, 08:49 De Naquadah stolen 15 717 1,769 622,077,651,000 823,530,476 details
^^^ I kinda forgot that I sent 25 mil unarmed normal attackers along for the ride...
so that's my bad...
but again, I'm surprised the other guy's troops bothered to fight... 8-[


Jan 22, 23:48 Trockstar 25,827,979,266 Naquadah stolen 15 2,500 979 658,988,076,883 482,771,520 details
I just remembered that some of them had less than 500 AC units tagging along... but I only lost 14 AC units to this guy... which leaves a lot of dead soldiers, though again unarmed...


I don't mind that my targets are doing a tiny little bit of damage,
it's the least the game could do for them...

but I didn't know it was changed, and that puzzles me greatly... :smt017

and is the percentage supposed to include my mothership action added as ground support?
Baxter
Forum Regular
Posts: 673
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:12 am
Alliance: ~Sand Village~
Race: Australian
ID: 1961730
Location: Australia

Re: Minimum Damage Bug?

i think it only applies if your attack is <30(?)% of their defense??

here is an attack on me with me doing <1/5 of their strike
**:19 *** 64,116,564,761 Naquadah stolen 15 48,367 5,000 448,683,840,000 20,826,473,591,401


also, the calculations are done before MS, says on the updates page
Prior - Prophet - Messiah - Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG- AGL - IAG - TAG - PTAG - LTAG - QTAG - KTAG - GAG - TOE - TUS - TUN - TUK
Image
Spoiler
Byrnes wrote:Triangle Allegiance is accepting applications now :-D
Juliette wrote:To recommend Chrome is to say "Here, have this grenade. I'll pull the plug. Now you hold on to that grenade and run like hell."

IE beats Chrome. Hell, EVERYTHING beats Chrome. ICQ **Filtered** beats Chrome. A telex beats Chrome. And even.. BP beats Chrome.
SlimD
Forum Irregular
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 4:23 pm
Race: Human
Location: Enjoying the real world

Re: Minimum Damage Bug?

Dubby, how damaged were your weapons? When I used to RAID and my weps were REALLY damaged some troops would die.
Cheers,
SlimD - sniffing around the forums
Locked

Return to “Bugs Archive”