Raid - Poll

Remove the new raid rank restrictions?

Yes
51
91%
No
5
9%
 
Total votes: 56
User avatar
Mango
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 769
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:15 pm
ID: 0
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Raid - Poll

I am starting this because the other poll was ambiguous and players wern't really sure what was asked.

I know this is a double up on an issue but I think it is needed.

For those who arnt aware the new raid restrictions are :

A player may only raid a player who is ranked higher than the raiders (Rank +10) X2

EG if you are rank 1000 you can only raid a player who's rank is 2020 or better
1000 + 10 = 1010
1010 X 2 = 2020
BL1P wrote:Im sorry for your fiend and the toilet paper accident...
User avatar
buck
The Main Event
Posts: 9809
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:56 am
Race: Degenerate
ID: 16843
Location: Between and Devil and the Ace of spades

Honours and Awards

i think it should be more powerful...unsure about these resrictions though.
Image
Image
Spoiler
Image
Image
2006 -
Poster of the Year
2007 -
Runner up signature of the Year
Runner up most improved player of the Year
Runner up hero of the Year
Alliance war of the year (CIA vs COP)
2008-
Hall of Fame
2009-
Runner up Hero of the Year
2010-
Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Tekki)
Runner up Vendetta of the Year (Buck vs Darthudd)

Noteworthy alliances-
Omega
Mayhem
Radical Minority
Nemesis Sect
Warlords of Briton

Previous affiliations-
TL
Ricos
DDE
The Tok'ra
The OOC
The SLA

Missed and dear friends -
Too Many to count, but never forgotten.
Code:
"Now I Don't like you, I don't respect you, and I sure as hell don't fear you. But seeing how your standing in the middle of my yard, I will break you."
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

when there are people in the 3000's with over 20 billion in defense this is just silly ....... there are alot of players with a HIGH Defense no attack or mothership and good covert ........if those players leave alot of UU out i should have the opportunity to raid them if i can handle the defense ...
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
Spoon
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 904
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:27 pm
ID: 0
Location: Lurking...........

Remove the restrictions, they are overly harsh, its not like that many small players would leave enough uu out for it to be worthwhile anyway
Keep smiling it makes people wonder what your up to.
seanet1310
Forum Newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:39 pm

leave them or make it not as harsh but them still there
Eternal Usul
"Special Title"
Posts: 2493
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:35 pm
Race: Goa'uld System Lord
ID: 19701
Alternate name(s): Xjba#1819(battle.net)
Eternal Usul(Steam)
Location: In the place between places.

My opinion =


Needs more power, no rank restrictions....



I've gotten a grand total of 300 uu since it came out...and that's all my raids...total...


Against ppl with over 1mil units...
"Arrakis teaches the attitude of the knife - chopping off what's incomplete and saying: "Now, it's complete because it's ended here."

-"Collected Sayings of Muad'dib"
User avatar
Wolf359
The Big Bad Admin
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:40 am
Alliance: EPA
Race: Tauri
ID: 0
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Honours and Awards

My opinion? Do not post a poll/topic on a subject for which a poll/topic already exists!

LOCKED!

On further reflection (given the arguments of 311 and the realisation that this update is not very popular) I have decided to unlock this, but have moved it to game suggestions.

Wolf
Image
Severian wrote:So I say as a last resort, splice Semper & Wolf359 for a good balance, Clone said unholy abomination a hundred times, let loose on forums and problem solved.
Mod Speak
311 [TA]
Forum Expert
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:41 pm
ID: 0

thank you, this is a good suggestion

i think it should be REMOVED
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,
is good men do nothing.
Image
Image
*Much props to greenman for my wicked new sig, thanks G oh yeaaaaaaaaah! *
User avatar
schuesseled
Forum Expert
Posts: 1013
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:05 pm
ID: 33241

i think taht the restrictions should be removed and that the raid takes more uu, coz otherwise why even have it
12agnar0k be taking over this here account, argh!

Image
User avatar
Q Man
blarney stone
Posts: 5129
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:39 pm
ID: 0
Location: behind you

yeah it is rubbish you should take a pile of men not just 1 or 2
Spoon
Forum Intermediate
Posts: 904
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:27 pm
ID: 0
Location: Lurking...........

Q MAN wrote:yeah it is rubbish you should take a pile of men not just 1 or 2


If you are only getting one or two you are hitting the wrong targets.
Keep smiling it makes people wonder what your up to.
meltguy
Forum Newbie
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:04 pm

I think the raid restrictions are rediculous..i mean it is just like naq. if u dont want ppl taking them then put em UP!!
bond007

The raid restrictions are crazy.. let us just play the game.. i mean if u dont want ppl taking the UU then put em UP!!!
LPCA
Forum Newbie
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 7:58 am

YES

useless as is


one suggestion
MAKE POLLS BEFORE APPLYING PATCHES
-LP
cinder__393
Forum Grunt
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:39 am

my point of view is... in war u can attack any one... as such should be the same in this case ( if they have the uu out ) you should be able to attack for it no matter rank...
Image
ANTI CHEATER ...
Locked

Return to “Suggestions Archive”